Skip to main content
Log in

Scientific publishing in West Africa: comparing Benin with Ghana and Senegal

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared scientific indicators related to Benin, Senegal and Ghana. We collected data from Web of Science and used bibliometric indicators like annual production, language and type of publication, citable and cited documents, citations, h-index, field share, specialization index, and international collaboration rate. Results show that Benin performs well regarding the percentage of citable and cited documents, the share of production and the specialization index in the fields of Natural sciences and Agricultural sciences; it occupies the median position with respect to the production and the specialization index in the fields of Engineering and technology on the one hand and Medical and health sciences on the other hand, behind Ghana and ahead Senegal. It lays however behind Ghana and Senegal with respect to the total output, citations per citable or cited documents, h-index, the share of production and specialization index in the fields of Social science and Humanities; it has the highest international collaboration rate. The study revealed that the three countries cooperated less, and only if a third western country intervened. It pointed out the role of Western countries in driving collaboration among developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Resolution CM/Res.464 (XXVI) adopted by the African Unity Organisation (now African Union) Council of Ministers meeting in its twenty-sixth ordinary session in Addis-Ababa (Ethiopia) from 23 February to 1 March 1976. The countries’ list was updated in 2004.

  2. CDS-ISIS is text database management software developed and distributed by UNESCO. (http://www.unesco.org/isis).

  3. CDS/ISIS provides a programming language “designed to develop CDS/ISIS applications requiring functions which are not readily available in the standard package” (UNESCO 1989a). This programming language enables users to extend functions of the standard package, to make it more robust to meet users’ specific needs (Mêgnigbêto 1998).

  4.  « The formatting language allows you to define precise formatting requirement for data base records. Through this language, you may select one or more specific data elements in the order you want and optionally insert constant text of your choice, e. g. to label some or all the fields, as well as specify vertical or horizontal spacing requirements (…). The formatting language is therefore the core of many operations, and an efficient use of CDS/ISIS requires a thorough knowledge of this techniques » (UNESCO 1989b).

  5. Power functions have to be preferred above other functions while fitting an Information Production Process; they enable direct comparison of results whether one works with small or high numbers (Egghe 2005, p. 2).

References

  • Boshoff, N. (2009). Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81(2), 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshoff, N. (2010). South–South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Scientometrics, 84, 416–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2005). Power laws in the information production process: Lotkaian informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

  • Gaillard, J. (2010). Le système national de recherche scientifique et technique au Bénin: un état des lieux. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Ministry of environment, science and technology. (2010). National science, technology and innovation policy. Accra: Ghana Ministry of environment, science and technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement du Bénin. (2006). Politique nationale et grands axes de la recherche scientifique et technologique au Bénin. Cotonou: Gouvernement du Bénin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbuba, D., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: Selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant. Scientometrics, 84(2), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mêgnigbêto, E. (1998). Le traitement informatique des particules nobiliaires: une expérience avec CDS/ISIS. Documentaliste-Sciences de l’information, 35, 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency. (2010). African innovation outlook 2010. Pretoria: NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCDE. (2011). Statistiques sur les apports de ressources aux pays en développement. Paris: OCDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati manual (No. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2006)19/Final) (p. 12). Paris: OECD.

  • Pouris, A. (2010). A scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa development community: Science in the tip of Africa. Scientometrics, 85, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79, 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCImago. (2007). SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com.

  • Sock, O. (2004). Politique d’enseignement supérieur et de recherche scientifique au Sénégal: Situation actuelle et perspectives. Presented at the Fifth Annual Global Development Conference, New Delhi, India.

  • Testa, J. (2011). The globalization of Web of Science. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/globalwos-essay.pdf.

  • Thomson Reuters. (2010). OECD Classification—Web of science subject headings. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from http://incites.isiknowledge.com/common/help/h_field_category_oecd_wos.html.

  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen, H., & Ponomariov, B. (2011). African regional innovations systems: Bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics, 88(2), 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1989a). Mini-micro CDS/ISIS: Manuel de référence: version 2.3. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1989b). Mini-micro CDS/ISIS: Pascal CDS/ISIS. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eustache Mêgnigbêto.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 8.

Table 8 More productive countries than Benin in West Africa

Appendix 2

See Table 9.

Table 9 African regions (according to the African Union)

Appendix 3: Characteristics of the intra three countries collaboration

The six papers the three countries shared have 93 co-authors from 17 countries and 29 cities. Cotonou and Dakar represented Benin and Senegal respectively; Ghanaian cities occurred three times, namely Accra, Legon and Tamale. The publication of the 6 papers involved collaboration between 48 institutions; Figure 7 visualized the induced network. It shows two separate components, that is, two groups of institutions that didn’t cooperated in publishing at all. On the one hand, the component on the left counts 30 institutions: some western institutions (University of Arizona - USA, University of Leeds-UK, University of Paris- France, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA, USA), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, USA), Météo France (France), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD, France), Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS - France) and on the other hand, mainly national meteorology directorates of West African countries (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Niger, Ghana, Senegal, etc.). This component is related to 4 of the 6 papers Benin, Ghana and Senegal shared in common. Obviously, their output are related to Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences according to the Web of Science subject areas, and therefore to Earth and related environment sciences according to the OECD FOS. The second component, on the right, groups together 18 institutions among which international organizations or associations with national representations to the West African countries: West Africa Project to Combat AIDS and STI (WAPCAS) in Quebec (Canada) and its national representations in West Africa (Benin, Ghana, Senegal, Mali, Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Togo) are the backbone of this component. They are responsible for 2 publications related to Medical and health sciences according to FOS.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Institutions involved in Benin, Ghana and Senegal’s common papers and their relationships

Over the 48 institutions, 2 are based in each of the three countries, one from each component. The Benin-based are Direction nationale de la météorologie and WAPCAS-Bénin; the Senegal-based are Direction nationale de la météorologie and WAPCAS-Sénégal. Meteorology Service Department and WAPCAS-Ghana represent Ghana. Hence, the three countries based institutions worked together only if a Western or international organisation intervened. Therefore, Western or international organisations or institutions are drivers of collaboration.

The breakdown of the 164 papers resulting from bilateral collaboration with regard to the FOS gives: Natural sciences 16.46 % (27 papers), Engineering and technology 16.46 % (16 papers), Medical and health sciences 60.97 % (100 2 papers), Agricultural Sciences 16.46 % (27 papers), Social sciences 3.05 % (5 papers) and Humanities 0 %. 506 institutions cooperated to achieve these publications and shared up to 13 papers. Figure 8 visualizes the relationships with at least 4 papers. It shows two components: one smaller and one larger. The illustration of the bilateral collaboration is as follows: 1) Benin and Senegal: Université d’Abomey-Calavi shared 13 papers with Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar and 8 papers with the Ecole Inter Etats de Sciences et Médécine Vétérinaires (EISMV, Senegal). IRD Bénin cooperated with the Université Cheikh Antan Diop de Dakar on 5 papers and with IRD-Sénégal on 4 papers. The Centre de Recherche entomologique de Cotonou and IRD Sénégal shared 4 papers. 2) Benin and Ghana: the collaboration involved the Université d’Abomey Calavi and the University of Ghana with 55 papers out of the 60 the two countries shared on the one hand and the Ministries of Health of the two countries (9 papers) on the other hand. This figure doesn’t show any Ghanaian institutions in their relationships with Senegalese. Apart from the main universities from each of the three countries, there is no direct cooperation between research institutions. Universities are the main actors of knowledge sharing within the three countries (Figs. 7, 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Institutions involved in Benin, Ghana and Senegal’s bilateral collaboration and their relationships

Appendix 4

See Table 10.

Table 10 Benin, Ghana and the Précarré africain’s top 10 donors and their contributions (million USD) in 2009–2010

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mêgnigbêto, E. Scientific publishing in West Africa: comparing Benin with Ghana and Senegal. Scientometrics 95, 1113–1139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0948-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0948-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

JEL Classification

Navigation