Skip to main content
Log in

Technological collaboration patterns in solar cell industry based on patent inventors and assignees analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines technological collaboration in the solar cell industry using the information of patent assignees and inventors as defined by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Three different collaborative types, namely local (same city), domestic (different cities of the same country), and international collaboration, are discussed. The general status of solar cell patent collaborations, transforming trends of collaborative patterns, average numbers of assignees and inventors for three collaborative types, and international collaboration countries are studied. It is found that co-invented patents and co-assigned patents have both increased in numbers during the four decades studied, and that collaboration between technology owners is very low while the collaboration between inventors is active. Domestic collaboration is the main collaborative pattern for both assignee collaboration and inventor collaboration. The other two collaborative types show contrary trends: international collaboration has slowly risen in the past decades while local collaboration has dwindled. The US has the largest number of internationally collaborative patents worldwide, though such patents account for a low portion of total US patents. In contrast, China has a small total number of patents and internationally collaborative patents, however its international collaborative shares are higher. The international collaboration patents among countries are few. A co-assigned patent analysis indicates that the main international cooperation partner of the United States is Japan. Based on an international co-invented patent analysis, the main international collaboration partners of the United States are Britain, Japan, and Germany; and the United States is also the most important collaboration partner of China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. (1999). Learning and adaptation in decentralized business networks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(1), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. (1989). Technological innovation and multinational corporations. New York: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. Z., Dong, H. R., & Huang, M. H. (2010). A study of collaborations in solar cell science and technology. The 5th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Management of Innovation and Technology, pp 794–799.

  • Chiu, T. F., Hong, C. F., & Chiu, Y. T. (2010). Trend detection on thin-film solar cell technology using cluster analysis and modified data crystallization. International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence, 6421(2010), 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, T. F., Hong, C. F., Wang, M. Y., Hsu, C. L., & Chiu, Y. T. (2009). Applying chance discovery with dummy event in technology monitoring of solar cell. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5579, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2002). An introduction to the economy of the knowledge society. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemal, H., & Dulude, L. S. (1987). Patenting patterns in 25 large multinational enterprises. Technovation, 7(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., Guan, J., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Mapping collaborative knowledge production in China using patent co-inventorships. Scientometrics, 88(2), 343–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., & Van, B. P. (2001). The internationalization of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30, 1253–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger-Waldau, A. (2007). PV status report 2007-research, solar cell production and market implementation of photovoltaics. European Commission, JRC Technical Notes.

  • Lei, X. P., Chen, D. Z., Huang, M. H., Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., et al. (2012). An analysis of innovation competitiveness of China through patent analysis. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 17(2), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., Mckelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., & Lee, Y. (2008). Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005. Technovation, 28(6), 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C. F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. (1991). Globalization of research, scholarly information and patents—ten years trend. Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group (NASIG) 6th Annual Conference, The Serials Librarian 21, pp. 2–3.

  • Ortega, J. L. (2011). Collaboration patterns in patent networks and their relationship with the transfer of technology: the case study of the CSIC patents. Scientometrics, 87(3), 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIPO (State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C.) (2012). Distribution of annual applications for three kinds of patents received from home and abroad. Retrieved Oct. 19, 2012, from http://www.sipo.gov.cn/ghfzs/zltjjb/jianbao/year2011/a/a2.html.

  • Tappeiner, G., Hauser, C., & Walde, J. (2008). Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact? Research Policy, 37(5), 861–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. Y., & Chiu, T. F. (2010). Monitoring the key technology trends by combining chance discovery and survival analysis: Study on solar cell patent documents. Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 1–7.

  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2012). IPC Green Inventory. Retrieved Jan. 30, 2012, from http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/est/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dar-Zen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lei, XP., Zhao, ZY., Zhang, X. et al. Technological collaboration patterns in solar cell industry based on patent inventors and assignees analysis. Scientometrics 96, 427–441 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0944-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0944-x

Keywords

Navigation