Scholarly publishing in social sciences and humanities, associated probabilities of belonging and its spectrum: a quantitative approach for the Spanish case
In this study, differences between Spanish social sciences and humanities journals are examined using a quantitative approach. Firstly, using a set of 144 psychology journals and 69 philosophy journals, statistically significant differences have been identified in 11 characteristics/indicators. Secondly, a logistic regression was carried out on the dichotomous response variable “belonging to the social sciences” or “belonging to the humanities”, on 777 Spanish social sciences journals, 563 humanities journals that have been previously classified and 17 existing predictor variables. The regression model reached an overall correct classification of 78.8 %. The explanatory variables considered in the model are analyzed and interpreted taking into account the change in the odds ratio and the indication of their contribution to the correct classification rate in the two response values. Finally the average associated probability of belonging to the social sciences group is calculated for each discipline and reflected in a spectrum of the probability of belonging to the social sciences or the humanities.
KeywordsSocial sciences Humanities Quality indicators Logistic regression Classification of knowledge
Mathematics Subject Classification62G08
- Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coautorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 855–871. doi:10.1002/asi.10278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics. Online first February 2012.Google Scholar
- ERIH. European Reference Index for the Humanities, European Science Foundation (2012). Online resource. http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/erih-european-reference-index-for-the-humanities.html. Accessed 20 April 2012.
- Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 473–496). Dordrecht, The Nederlands: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_22.Google Scholar
- Hicks, D., & Wang, J. (2009). Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/diana_hicks/18.
- Leydesdorff, L., & Salah, A. A. A. (2011). Maps on the basis of the arts & humanities citation index: The journals Leonardo and art journal versus “digital humanities” as a topic. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 787–801. doi:10.1002/asi.21636.Google Scholar
- Valenzuela-García, H. (1998). Una aportación teórica a la evolución del concepto, término y definición de biblioteconomía. Revista General de Información y Documentación., 8(1), 111–139.Google Scholar
- White, K. D., Dalgleish, L., & Arnold, G. (1982). Authorship patterns in psychology: National and international trends. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 20(4), 190–192.Google Scholar