Skip to main content

Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis

Abstract

This study aims to identify possible gender inequalities in the scholarly output of researchers in the field of psychology in Spain. A sample of 522 papers and reviews published in 2007 was extracted from the Thomson ISI Web of Science. The presence of women, the collaboration pattern and the impact of these scientific publications were analyzed. The results show that the average number of female researchers per paper was 0.42 (SD 0.33) and that 42.3 % of the papers had a female researcher as the first author. Moreover, the proportion of female authors of a paper was statistically significantly higher when the first author was female. Studies carried out in cooperation with other Spanish or international institutions had fewer female authors than studies conducted at a single center. The impact of the papers, measured by the journal impact factor and the number of citations, was independent of the authors’ gender or the proportion of female authors. In summary, the study highlights a gender imbalance in Spanish scientific output in Psychology, and a higher proportion of male researchers in international networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bentley, J. T. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: a literature review. Arlington: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. M., & Holden, E. W. (1998). The impact of gender on productivity and satisfaction among medical school psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 5(1), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R., Shaughnessy, P., & Pecker, G. (1985). Women and publishing in psychology. American Psychologist, 40(5), 577–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Fernández, T., & Gómez, I. (2003). One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: differences by gender and professional category of scientists. Scientometrics, 57(2), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego, A., Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., & Ollé, C. (2010). Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: a gender perspective. Scientometrics, 83(1), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschini, A., & Sjogren, A. (2007). Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2), 325–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2, 217–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copenheaver, C. A., Goldbeck, K., & Cherubini, P. (2010). Lack of gender bias in citation rates of publications by dendrochronologists: What is unique about this discipline? Tree-Ring Research, 66(2), 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, R., Vermigli, P., & Canetto, S. S. (2011). Publication productivity and career advancement by female and male psychology faculty: the case of Italy. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(3), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasaratha, V. R., Raghunandan, K., Logan, L. B., & Barkman, B. V. (1997). Gender differences in publications by promoted faculty. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. D., Jadidian, A., Webster, G. D., & Sandell, K. J. (2011). The research productivity of academic psychologists: assessment, trends, and best practice recommendations. Scientometrics, 28(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einav, L., & Yariv, L. (2006). What’s in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009). She Figures 2009. Statistics and indicators on gender equality in science. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  • Ferber, M. A., & Teiman, M. (1980). Are women economists at a disadvantage in publishing journal articles? Eastern Economics Journal, 6(3–4), 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan, M. J., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). Examining the relationship between gender and the research productivity of IS faculty. In: SIGMIS CPR ‘06 Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges & the future (pp. 103–113).

  • Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2006). Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973–2001. NBER Working Paper, 12691. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=944179.

  • González-Alcaide, G., Castelló-Cogollos, L., Bolaños-Pizarro, M., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2010). Veinte años de investigación de la psicología española en Psicothema (1989–2008). Psicothema, 22(1), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Brambila, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: a study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7), 1035–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, L., & Fidell, L. (1973). Publication of men and women psychologists. American Psychologist, 28(2), 157–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., et al. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. A., & Leahey, E. (2010). Parenting and research productivity: new evidence and methods. Social Studies of Science, 40(3), 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy, S. (2006). What should I be doing, and where are they doing it? Scholarly productivity of academic psychologists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 346–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(1), 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, E., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledin, A., Bornmann, L., Gannon, F., & Wallon, G. (2007). A persistent problem. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 982–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, W. (1995). Productivity patterns of men and women scientists in Venezuela. Scientometrics, 24(2), 281–295.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, G. (2001). The quantity and quality of female researchers: a bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malouff, J., Schutte, N., & Priest, J. (2010). Publication rates of Australian academic psychologists. Australian Psychologist, 45(2), 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of materials science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauleón, E., Bordons, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2008). The effect of gender on research staff success in life sciences in the Spanish National Research Council. Research Evaluation, 17(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. M., Singell, L. D., & Stater, M. (2005). Two to tango? Gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor. Economic Inquiry, 44(1), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. M., & Smith, J. K. (1992). The effect of gender-sorting on propensity of coauthor: implications for academic promotion. Economic Inquiry, 30(1), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mestre Escrivá, V., Martí Vilar, M., & Samper García, P. (1996). Productividad científica en Psicología y la variable género. Un estudio a través de la Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada (RPGA). Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 17(1–2), 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., González-Molina, A., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., et al. (2007). Scientific output by gender in Spain (Web of Science, 2004). In: 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. 25–27 June, Madrid (Spain).

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, INEbase (2011). Retrieved Oct 2011. http://www.ine.es/inebmenu/indice.htm

  • Nosek, B. A., Graham, J., Lindner, N. M., Kesebir, S., Hawkins, C. B., Hahn, C., et al. (2010). Cumulative and career-stage citation impact of social-personality psychology programs and their members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1283–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivas-Avila, J. A., & Musi-Lechuga, B. (2010). Análisis de la producción de los profesores funcionarios de psicología en España en artículos de revistas de la Web of Science. Psicothema, 22(4), 909–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prpic, K. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics, 55(1), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puuska, H. M. (2010). Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82(2), 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, L. A., Aldrich, H., & Moody, J. (2000). Family matters: gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 79(2), 523–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L., Hagedorn, L., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in higher education, 43(4), 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (2006). Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in higher education, 45(8), 891–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, M., Gemmell, N., Braisher, T., Gorringe, K., & Elgar, M. (2006). Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS One, 1(1), e127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tower, G., Plummer, J., & Ridgewell, B. (2007). A multidisciplinary study of gender-based research productivity in the world’s best journals. Journal of Diversity Management, 2(4), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarroya, A., Barrios, M., Borrego, A., Frías, A. (2008). PhD theses in Spain: a gender study covering the years 1990–2004. Scientometrics, 77(3), 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. B., & Grant, L. (1995). Gender and academic publishing. In A. E. Bayer & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Higher education: handbook of theory and research (pp. 172–212). New York: Agathon Press Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, B. M. (2001). Polish women in science: a bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications, 1980–1999. Research Evaluation, 10(3), 185–194.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported here was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (EA2008-0221).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maite Barrios.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrios, M., Villarroya, A. & Borrego, Á. Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis. Scientometrics 95, 15–23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0816-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0816-4

Keywords

  • Psychology
  • Scientific production
  • Gender
  • Collaboration
  • Impact factor
  • Citations

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

  • 62-07

JEL Classification

  • I23
  • I24