Scientometrics

, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 833–849 | Cite as

Produce patents or journal articles? A cross-country comparison of R&D productivity change

Article

Abstract

This paper compares R&D productivity change across countries considering the fact that national R&D expenditure may produce multiple outputs, including patents and journal articles. Based on the concept of directional distance function and Luenberger productivity index, this paper develops a Luenberger R&D productivity change (LRC) index and then decomposes it into R&D efficiency change (catch-up effect) and R&D technical change (innovation effect). Utilizing a panel dataset of 29 countries over the 1998–2005 period to implement the empirical estimation, the results show that the R&D productivity growth is mainly attributed to the innovation effect; meanwhile, non-OECD countries have better performance on both efficiency change and technical change than their OECD counterparts. Moreover, patent-oriented R&D productivity growth serves as the main source of national R&D productivity growth than the journal article-oriented one.

Keywords

R&D productivity change Patents Journal articles 

JEL Classification

C67 O33 O57 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2006). Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of European Economic Association, 4, 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boussemart, J. P., Briec, W., Kerstens, K., & Poutineau, J. C. (2003). Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices: Theoretical comparisons and empirical illustration. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55, 391–405.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, M. G., & Svensen, R. A. (1998). Measuring R&D productivity. Research and Technology Management, 41, 30–35.Google Scholar
  4. Cave, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewet, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y. H., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70, 407–419.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cullmann, A., Schmidt-Ehmcke, J., & Zloczysti, P. (2009). Innovation, R&D efficiency and the impact of the regulatory environment—a two stage semi-parametric DEA approach. In Paper (no. 883) presented on innovation economics. Berlin: DIW.Google Scholar
  7. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical change, and efficiency changes in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84, 66–83.Google Scholar
  8. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geisler, E. (1995). An integrated cost-performance model of research and development evaluation. International Journal of Management Science, 23, 281–294.Google Scholar
  10. Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mariesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  12. Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2010). Modeling macro-R&D production frontier performance: An application to Chinese province-level R&D. Scientometrics, 82, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 353–378.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (1995). Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 65, 263–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hashimoto, A., & Haneda, S. (2008). Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 37, 1829–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, H. Y., & Park, Y. T. (2005). An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu, W. C., & Liu, T. K. (2010). Malmquist indices of R&D productivity growth in Taiwanese IC-design industry. Global Journal of Business Research, 4, 105–114.Google Scholar
  18. Mairesse, J., & Hall, B. H. (1996). Estimating the productivity of research and development in French and US manufacturing firms: An exploration of simultaneity issues with GMM methods. In K. Wagner & B. van Ark (Eds.), International productivity differences and their explanations (pp. 285–315). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  19. Managi, S. (2003). Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices in Japan, 1955–1995. Applied Economics Letters, 10, 581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. OECD. (2001). OECD science, technology, and industry scoreboard. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  21. Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the firm Level: A first look. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Parisi, M. L., Schiantarelli, F., & Sembenelli, A. (2006). Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy. European Economics Review, 50, 2037–2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomas, V. J., Sudhir, K. J., & Sharma, S. (2009). Analyzing R&D efficiency in Asia and the OECD: An application of the Malmquist productivity index. In IEEE proceedings of the 2009 Atlanta conference on science and innovation policy. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  24. Wang, E. C. (2007). R&D efficiency and economic performance: a cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, E. C., & Huang, W. C. (2007). Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy, 36, 260–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu, W. Y., Tsai, H. J., Cheng, K. Y., & Lai, M. (2006). Assessment of intellectual capital management in Taiwanese IC design companies: Using DEA and the Malmquist productivity index. R&D Management, 36, 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Taiwan Institute of Economic ResearchTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.National Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsNational Central UniversityJhongli 320Taiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations