Citation increments between collaborating countries
- 680 Downloads
International collaboration enhances citation impact. Collaborating with a country increments the citations received from it. But some collaborating countries provide greater increments in this sense than others, and likewise some countries receive greater increments from their partner countries than others. We observed a certain tendency for these increments to be lower in countries with greater impacts. Also, all the countries studied had higher Domestic Impacts as a result of collaborating, although this increment was less than that obtained from other countries. Finally, there were differences in the behaviour of the countries between the various scientific disciplines, with the effects being greatest in Social Sciences, followed by Engineering.
KeywordsCitation increment Citation analysis Scientific collaboration in subject areas Scientometrics
This work was financed by the Junta de Extremadura e Consejería de Educación Ciencia & Tecnología and the Fondo Social Europeo as part of the pre-doctoral studentship PRE07052 and the research group grant GR10019, and by the Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica 2008e2011 and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) as part of research projects TIN2008-06514-C02-01 and TIN2008-06514-C0202.
- Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2001). Authorship pattern in different disciplines. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 48(4), 139–147.Google Scholar
- Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2004). Authorship collaboration in physics philosophy and political science, IASLIC National Seminar, 11th. Kolkata, 2004, 405–409.Google Scholar
- Kraut R., Egido C., & Galeguer, J. (1988). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. ‘CSCW ‘88: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work’, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences: A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies, 1980–1998. Library Trends, 50(3), 461–473.Google Scholar
- Molteni, V., & Zulueta, M. A. (2002). Análisis de la visibilidad internacional de la producción científica argentina en las Bases de datos Social Science Citation Index y Arts and Humanities Citation Index de 1990–2000: Estudio bibliométrico. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., González-Molina, A., Hassan-Montero, Y., & Vargas-Quesada, B. (2008). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española: 2002–2006. Madrid: FECYT.Google Scholar
- Pao, M. L. (1981). Coauthorship as communication measure. Library Research, 2, 327–338.Google Scholar
- Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (2008). SCImago Research Group. Accessed 26 March, 2009 http://www.scimagojr.com/.
- Sudhier Pillai, K. G. (2007). Authorship patterns in physics literature: An informetric study on citations in doctoral theses of the Indian Institute of Science. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54, 90–94.Google Scholar