A review of Garfield’s journal impact factor and its specific implementation as the Thomson Reuters impact factor reveals several weaknesses in this commonly-used indicator of journal standing. Key limitations include the mismatch between citing and cited documents, the deceptive display of three decimals that belies the real precision, and the absence of confidence intervals. These are minor issues that are easily amended and should be corrected, but more substantive improvements are needed. There are indications that the scientific community seeks and needs better certification of journal procedures to improve the quality of published science. Comprehensive certification of editorial and review procedures could help ensure adequate procedures to detect duplicate and fraudulent submissions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Abraham, P. (2000). Duplicate and salami publications. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 46, 67–69.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2010). Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable? Scientometrics, 84, 821–833.
Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2008). Joint committee on quantitative assessment of research: Citation statistics. The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, 35(3), 166–188.
Althouse, B. M., West, J. D., Bergstrom, C. T., & Bergstrom, T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 27–34.
Altmann, K. G., & Gorman, G. E. (1998). The usefulness of impact factors in serial selection: A rank and mean analysis using ecology journals. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, 22(2), 147–159.
Andrade, A., González-Jonte, R., & Campanario, J. M. (2009). Journals that increase their impact factor at least fourfold in a few years: The role of journal self-citations. Scientometrics, 80, 515–528.
Anonymous. (2004). Complacency about misconduct. Nature, 427, 1.
Anonymous (2011). The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. Thomson Reuters, http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_selection_process/. Accessed 2011 September 5.
ARC (2010). The excellence in research for Australia (ERA) Initiative. Australian Researh Council, Canberra. http://www.arc.gov.au/era/default.htm. Accessed 2011 August 5.
Archambault, E., & Lariviere, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79, 635–649.
Awrey, J., Inaba, K., Barmparas, G., Recinos, G., Teixeira, P. G. R., Chan, L. S., et al. (2011). Reference accuracy in the general surgery literature. World Journal of Surgery, 35, 475–479.
Bain, C. R., & Myles, P. S. (2005). Relationship between journal impact factor and levels of evidence in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 33(5), 567–570.
Barbour, V. (2010). How ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals. Haematologica, 95, 1–2.
Bath, F. J., Owen, V. E., & Bath, P. M. W. (1998). Quality of full and final publications reporting acute stroke trials: A systematic review. Stroke, 29(10), 2203–2210.
Beal, J. (2011). Wiley-Blackwell announces continued growth in impact factor journals. Press release 11 July 2011, http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-07/w-wac071111.php. Accessed 2011 August 25.
Bensman, S. J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93–155.
Bensman, S. J. (2008). Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1366–1382.
Bensman, S. J., Smolinsky, L. J., & Pudovkin, A. I. (2010). Mean citation rate per article in mathematics journals: Differences from the scientific model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1440–1463.
Bernstam, E. V., Herskovic, J. R., Aphinyanaphongs, Y., Aliferis, C. F., Sriram, M. G., & Hersh, W. R. (2006). Using citation data to improve retrieval from MEDLINE. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 96–105.
Berquist, T. H. (2008). Duplicate publishing or journal publication ethics 101. American Journal of Roentgenology, 191, 311–312.
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e6022.
Bonillo Perales, A. (2002). Spanish pediatric publications in pubmed between 1996 and 2001 [Publicaciones pediátricas españolas en PubMed en los años 1996 y 2001]. Anales Espanoles de Pediatria, 57(2), 152–156.
Bornmann, L., Nast, I., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication. Scientometrics, 77, 415–432.
Braun, T. (Ed.) (2007). The Impact Factor of scientific and scholarly journals: Its use and misuse in research evaluation. Scientometrics Guidebooks Series (vol. 2, pp. 686). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
Braun, T., & Glanzel, W. (1995). On a source of error in computing journal impact factors. Chemical Intelligencer, 1, 31–32.
Brown, H. (2007). How impact factors changed medical publishing: and science. BMJ, 334, 561–564.
Brumback, R. A. (2009a). Impact factor wars: Episode V: The empire strikes back. Journal of Child Neurology, 24, 260–262.
Brumback, R. A. (2009b). Impact factor: Let’s be unreasonable! Epidemiology, 20, 932–933.
Butakov, S., & Scherbinin, V. (2009). The toolbox for local and global plagiarism detection. Computers & Education, 52, 781–788.
Callaham, M., & McCulloch, C. (2011). Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 57, 141–148.
Callaham, M., Wears, R. L., & Weber, E. (2002). Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA, 287(21), 2847–2850.
Calver, M. C., & Bradley, J. S. (2010). Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 872–880.
Cameron, B. D. (2005). Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: Uses, abuses, and implications. Portal, 5, 105–125.
Campanario, J. M. (2011a). Empirical study of journal impact factors obtained using the classical two-year citation window versus a 5-year citation window. Scientometrics, 87, 189–204.
Campanario, J. M. (2011b). Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only 1 year: The effect of journal self-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 230–235.
Campanario, J. M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V., Molina, A., & Ros, G. (2011). Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: A wide-scale study. Scientometrics, 87, 75–84.
Campbell, P. (2008). Escape from the impact factor. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 5–7.
Cartwright, V. A., & McGhee, C. N. J. (2005). Ophthalmology and vision science research. Part 1: Understanding and using journal impact factors and citation indices. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 31, 1999–2007.
Cashore, B., van Kooten, C. G., Vertinsky, I., Auld, G., & Affolderbach, J. (2005). Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 53–69.
Chalmers, I. (2006). Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: Case of Asim Kurjak. BMJ, 333, 594.
Chapman, S., Ragg, M., & McGeechan, K. (2009). Citation bias in reported smoking prevalence in people with schizophrenia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(3), 277–282.
Cheek, J., Garnham, B., & Quan, J. (2006). What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qualitative Health Research, 16, 423–435.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.
Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., & Van Der Weyden, M. B. (2007). Life and times of the impact factor: Retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their Editors’ views. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 142–150.
Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. JASIST, 62(7), 1382–1402.
Cohen, J. B. (1938). The misuse of statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 33(204), 657–674.
Coleman, R. (1999). Impact factors: Use and abuse in biomedical research. Anatomical Record, 257, 54–57.
Coleman, A. (2007). Assessing the value of a journal beyond the impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1148–1161.
Davies, J. (1955). Phrenology: Fad and science: A 19th-century American crusade (p. 203). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dempsey, J. A. (2009). Impact factor and its role in academic promotion: a statement adopted by the international respiratory journal editors roundtable. Journal of Applied Physiology, 107, 1005.
Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2005). The “impact factor” revisited. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2, 7.
Dost, F. N. (2008). Peer review at a crossroads: A case study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 15, 443–447.
Drew, D. E., & Karpf, R. (1981). Ranking academic departments: Empirical findings and a theoretical perspective. Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 305–320.
Eaton, L. (2005). Medical editors issue guidance on ghost writing. BMJ, 330(7498), 988.
Elsevier (2011). Article posting policies. Elsevier BV. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/postingpolicy. Accessed 2011 September 10.
Epstein, R. J. (2004). Journal impact factors do not equitably reflect academic staff performance in different medical subspecialties. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 52, 531–536.
Errami, M., & Garner, H. (2008). A tale of two citations. Nature, 451, 397–399.
Errami, M., Hicks, J. M., Fisher, W., Trusty, D., Wren, J. D., Long, T. C., et al. (2008). Deja vu: A study of duplicate citations in medline. Bioinformatics, 24, 243–249.
Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et therapiae Experimentalis, 56(4), 223–226.
Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, A., Papilas, A., & Karabinis, G. (2000). Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84(2), 266–269.
Favaloro, E. J. (2009). The journal impact factor: Don’t expect its demise any time soon. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 47, 1319–1324.
Foo, J. Y. A. (2009). The retrospective analysis of bibliographical trends for nine biomedical engineering journals from 1999 to 2007. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37, 1474–1481.
Foo J. Y. A. (2010). A retrospective analysis of the trend of retracted publications in the field of biomedical and life sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9212-8.
Foo, J. Y. A. (2011). Impact of excessive journal self-citations: A case study on the folia phoniatrica et logopaedica journal. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 65–73.
Fox, M. F. (1994). Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. J Higher Educ, 65, 298–309.
Frank, M. (2003). Impact factors: arbiter of excellence? J Med Libr Assoc, 91, 4–6.
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479.
Garfield, E. (1994). The Thomson Reuters impact factor. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor/.
Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313, 411–413.
Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161, 979–980.
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295, 90–93.
Glänzel, W. (2009). The multi-dimensionality of journal impact. Scientometrics, 78, 355–374.
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53, 171–193.
Gluud, L. L., Sorensen, T. I. A., Gotzsche, P. C., & Gluud, C. (2005). The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: Cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 100, 2431–2435.
Glynn, R. W., Chin, J. Z., Kerin, M. J., & Sweeney, K. J. (2010). Representation of cancer in the medical literature: A bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE, 5(11), e13902.
Godlee, F. (2004). Dealing with editorial misconduct. BMJ, 329, 1301.
Goldstein, H., & Maier, G. (2010). The use and valuation of journals in planning scholarship: Peer assessment versus impact factors. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30, 66–75.
Gollogly, L., & Momen, H. (2006). Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors. Rev Saúde Pública, 40, 24–29.
Gøtzsche, P. C., Kassirer, J. P., Woolley, K. L., Wager, E., Jacobs, A., et al. (2009). What should be done to tackle ghost writing in the medical literature? PLoS Med, 6(2), e1000023. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023.
Greenwood, D. C. (2007). Reliability of journal impact factor rankings. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 48.
Gwilym, S. E., Swan, M. C., & Giele, H. (2004). One in 13 ‘original’ articles in the journal of bone and joint surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 86-B(5), 743–745.
Ha, T. C., Tan, S. B., & Soo, K. C. (2006). The journal impact factor: Too much of an impact? Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 35, 911–916.
Habibzadeh, F., & Winker, M. A. (2009). Duplicate publication and plagiarism: causes and cures. Notfall Rettungsmed, 12, 415–418.
Hames, I. (2007). Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice. Oxford: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470750803.
Hansen, H. B., & Henriksen, J. H. (1997). How well does journal ‘impact’ work in the assessment of papers on clinical physiology and nuclear medicine? Clinical Physiology, 17(4), 409–418.
Haslam, N., & Koval, P. (2010). Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social and personality psychology. Psychological Reports, 106(3), 891–900.
Hernan, M. A. (2009). Impact factor: A call to reason. Epidemiology, 20, 317–318.
Ho, D. (2011). Thomson Reuters: Cause for celebration! Journal of Laboratory Automation, 16(3), A7–A8.
Holsapple, C. W. (2009). Journal self-citation II: The quest for high impact:Truth and consequences? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25, 11–20.
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing S346 Research, 54, S346–S362.
Hunt, G. E., Cleary, M., & Walter, G. (2010). Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: The relationship between journal impact factors and accrued citations. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 207–219.
Jacobs, G., & Ip, B. (2005). Ring fenced research: The case of computer-assisted learning in health sciences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 361–377.
Jacso, P. (2009). Five-year impact factor data in the journal citation reports. Online Information Review, 33, 603–614.
Jahangiriana, M., Eldabi, T., Garg, L., Jun, G. T., Naseer, A., Patel, B., et al. (2011). A rapid review method for extremely large corpora of literature: Applications to the domains of modelling, simulation, and management. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 234–243.
Jeacle, I., & Carter, C. (2011). In TripAdvisor we trust: Rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.04.002.
Johnson, C. (2006). Repetitive, duplicate, and redundant publications: a review for authors and readers. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 29, 505–509.
Johnstone, M.-J. (2007). Journal impact factors: Implications for the nursing profession. International Nursing Review, 54, 35–40.
Jones, A. W. (2002). JAT’s impact factor: Room for improvement? Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 26, 2–5.
Jones, A. W. (2003). Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: What do the numbers really mean? Forensic Science International, 133, 1–8.
Jörgensen, P. (2005). Incorporating context in text analysis by interactive activation with competition artificial neural networks. Information Processing & Management, 41(5), 1081–1099.
Kapeller, J. (2010). Citation metrics: Serious drawbacks, perverse incentives, and strategic options for heterodox economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69, 1376–1408.
Ketcham, C. M. (2008). The proper use of citation data in journal management. Archivum Immunologiae et therapiae Experimentalis, 56, 357–362.
Knothe, G. (2006). Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1830–1839.
Kotiaho, J. S., Tomkins, J. L., & Simmons, L. W. (1999). Unfamiliar citations breed mistakes. Nature, 400, 307.
Krell, F.-T. (2010). Should editors influence journal impact factors? Learned Publishing, 23, 59–62.
Kumar, V., Upadhyay, S., & Medhi, B. (2009). Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: Its use and misuse. Singapore Medical Journal, 50, 752–755.
Kurmis, A. P. (2003). Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: Series A, 85, 2449–2454.
Kurmis, A. P., & Kurmis, T. P. (2006). Exploring the relationship between impact factor and manuscript rejection rates in radiologic journals. Academic Radiology, 13, 77–83.
Kurmis, T. P., & Kurmis, A. P. (2010). Self-citation rates among medical imaging journals and a possible association with impact factor. Radiography, 16, 21–25.
Laband, D. N. (1990). Is there value-added from the review process in economics?: Preliminary evidence from authors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 341–352.
Lange, L. L. (2002). The impact factor as a phantom: Is there a self-fulfilling prophecy effect of impact? Journal of Documentation, 58, 175–184.
Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2010). The impact factor’s Matthew effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 424–427.
Lau, S. L., & Samman, N. (2007). Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 36, 1–5.
Lawrence, P. A. (2007). The mismeasurement of science. Current Biology, 17, R583–R585.
Lehmkuhl, G., Petermann, F., & Warnke, A. (2009). Research in child and adolescent psychiatry, promotion of young academics and publication practice [Kinder- und jugendpsychiatrische Forschung, Förderung des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses und Veröffentlichungspraxis]. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 37, 93–96.
Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2007). As mirrored by the journal: Themes and trends of educational psychology in the years 2005 to 2007 [Im Spiegel der Zeitschrift: Themen und Trends der Pädagogischen Psychologie in den Jahren 2005 bis 2007]. Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 21, 195–202.
Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Scopus’s source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2365–2369.
Lock, S. (1995). Lessons from the Pearce affair: Handling scientific fraud. BMJ, 310, 1547–1548.
Lomnicki, A. (2003). Impact factors reward and promote excellence. Nature, 424, 487.
Maier, G. (2006). Impact factors and peer judgment: The case of regional science journals. Scientometrics, 69(3), 651–667.
McGarty, C. (2000). The citation impact factor in social psychology: a bad statistic that encourages bad science. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5, 1–16.
McKeever, L. (2006). Online plagiarism detection services: Saviour or scourge? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 155–165.
McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Journal self-citation in the journal citation reports. Thomson Reuters, http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_self_citation_jcr. Accessed 2011 September 7.
McVeigh, M. E., & Mann, S. J. (2009). The journal impact factor denominator: Defining citable (counted) items. JAMA, 302, 1107–1109.
Medarević, M., Banković, S., Pantić, D. & Obradović, S. (2010) Effects of the control method (goč variety) in selection forest management in western Serbia. Archives of Biological Science, 62(2), 407–418.
Mehrad, J., & Goltaji, M. (2010). Correlation between journal self citation with impact factor for the scientific publications in humanities published between 2001 and 2007 based on Persian journal citation report generated by Islamic science citation database. Information Sciences and Technology, 25, 189–206.
Mehrad, J., & Goltaji, M. (2011). Correlation between journal self-citation and impact factor in ISC’s PJCR agriculture and veterinary science journals during 2001–2007. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 9, 75–87.
Meneghini, R., Packer, A. L., & Nassi-Calo, L. (2008). Articles by Latin American authors in prestigious journals have fewer citations. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3804.
Metze, K. (2010). Bureaucrats, researchers, editors and the impact factor: A vicious circle that is detrimental to science. Clinics, 65(10), 937–940.
Meyer zu Eissen, S., & Stein, B. (2006). Intrinsic plagiarism detection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3936, 565–569.
Minelli, C., Thompson, J. R., Abrams, K. R., Thakkinstian, A., & Attia, J. (2009). The quality of meta-analyses of genetic association studies: A review with recommendations. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170, 1333–1343.
Moed, H., & Plume, A. (2011). Research assessment: The multi-dimensional research assessment matrix. Research Trends, 23, 5–7.
Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, Th. N., & Reedijk, J. (1996). A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society: Inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only. Scientometrics, 37, 105–116.
Moller, J., Retelsdorf, J., & Sudkamp, A. (2010). As mirrored by the journal: Themes and trends of educational psychology in the years 2008 to 2010 [Im Spiegel der Zeitschrift: Themen und Trends der Pädagogischen Psychologie in den Jahren 2008 bis 2010]. Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 24, 163–169.
Monastersky, R. (2005). The number that’s devouring science. The chronicle of higher education 52(8):A12 http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i08/08a01201.htm.
Mullen, L. B. (2008). Increasing Impact of Scholarly Journal Articles: Practical Strategies Librarians Can Share. E-JASL: The Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship 9, 1, http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n01/mullen_l01.html. Accessed 2011 September 1.
Neuhaus, C., Marx, W., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of chemical abstracts: A case study on the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 176–183.
Obremskey, W. T., Pappas, N., Attallah-Wasif, E., Tornetta, P., I. I. I., & Bhandari, M. (2005). Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: Series A, 87(12 I), 2632–2638.
Ogden, T. L., & Bartley, D. L. (2008). The ups and downs of journal impact factors. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 52(2), 73–82.
Owlia, P., Vasei, M., Goliaei, B., & Nassiri, I. (2011). Normalized impact factor (NIF): An adjusted method for calculating the citation rate of biomedical journals. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44, 216–220.
Patterson, M. (2009). Is the end in cite? EMBO reports, 10(11), 1186.
Perneger, T. V. (2010). Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(6), 660–664.
PLoS Medicine Editors. (2006). The impact factor game. PLoS Med, 3(6), e291. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
Poomkottayil, D., Bornstein, M. M., & Sendi, P. (2011). Lost in translation: The impact of publication language on citation frequency in the scientific dental literature. Swiss Medical Weekly, 141, w13148.
Porter, M., & McIntyre, S. (1984). What is, must be best: A research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provision. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 1197–1200.
Postma, E. (2007). Inflated impact factors? The true impact of evolutionary papers in non-evolutionary journals. PLoS ONE, 2(10), e999.
Preti, F., Dani, A., & Laio, F. (2010). Root profile assessment by means of hydrological, pedological and above-ground vegetation information for bio-engineering purposes. Ecological Engineering, 36, 305–316.
Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2004). Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 41, 507–515.
Racki, G. (2009). Rank-normalized journal impact factor as a predictive tool. Archivum Immunologiae et therapiae Experimentalis, 57, 39–43.
Ramsden, J. J. (2009). Impact factors: A critique. Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 9, 139–140.
Reedijk, J., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Is the impact of journal impact factors decreasing? Journal of Documentation, 64, 183–192.
Reller, T. (2011). Elsevier announces 2010 journal impact factor highlights. Press release, 14 July 2011. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/elsevier-announces-2010-journal-impact-factor-highlights-2011-07-14. Accessed 2011 August 25.
Resnik, D. B., Peddada, S., & Brunson, W., Jr. (2009). Research misconduct policies of scientific journals. Accountability in Research, 16, 254–267.
Resnik, D. B., Patrone, D., & Peddada, S. (2010). Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor. Accountability in Research, 17, 79–84.
Rezaei-Ghaleh, N., & Azizi, F. (2007). The impact factor-based quality assessment of biomedical research institutes in Iran: Effect of impact factor normalization by subject. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 10, 182–189.
Rieseberg, L., & Smith, H. (2008). Editorial and Retrospective. Molecular Ecology, 17, 501–513.
Rieseberg, L., Vines, T., & Kane, N. (2011). 20 years of molecular ecology. Molecular Ecology, 20, 1–21.
Robert, C. P. (2010). On the relevance of the Bayesian approach to statistics. Review of Economic Analysis, 2, 139–152.
Roberts, J. (2009). An author’s guide to publication ethics: A review of emerging standards in biomedical journals. Headache, 49, 578–589.
Roosendaal, H. E., Geurts, P. A. T. M. (1997). Forces and functions in scientific communication: An analysis of their interplay. Cooperative Research Information Systems in Physics, August 31–September 4 1997, Oldenburg. http://www.physik.unioldenburg.de/conferences/crisp97/roosendaal.html.
Rossner, M. (2006). How to guard against image fraud. The Scientist, 20(3), 24–25.
Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, 179, 1091–1092.
Rousseau, R. (2002). Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues. Library Trends, 50, 418.
Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (1996). Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 775–780.
Ruiz, M. A., Greco, O. T., & Braile, D. M. (2009). Journal impact factor: This editorial, academic and scientific influence [Fator de impacto: Importancia e influencia no meio editorial, academico e cientifico]. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 24, 273–278.
Saha, S., Saint, S., & Christakis, D. A. (2003). Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91, 42–46.
Sample, I. (2002). People weigh less on a hard surface. New Scientist http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2462-people-weigh-less-on-a-hard-surface.html.
Saunders, R., & Savulescu, J. (2008). Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud? Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 214–221.
Schoonbaert, D., & Roelants, G. (1996). Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: Quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? Tropical Medicine and International Health, 1, 739–752.
Schopfel, J., & Prost, H. (2009). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator (SJR) with JCR journal impact factor (IF) for French journals [Le JCR facteur d’impact (IF) et le SCImago journal rank indicator (SJR) des revues françaises: une étude comparative]. Psychologie Francaise, 54, 287–305.
Schubert, A., & Glanzel, W. (1983). Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 5, 59–73.
Schumm, W. R. (2010). A comparison of citations across multidisciplinary psychology journals: A case study of two independent journals. Psychological Reports, 106, 314–322.
Scully, C., & Lodge, H. (2005). Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused? British Dental Journal, 198, 391–393.
Seglen, P. O. (1989). Use of citation analysis and other bibliometric methods in evaluation of the quality of research [Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningskvalitet]. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, 109(31), 3224–3229.
Seglen, P. O. (1992). Journal impact: How representative is the journal impact factor? Research Evaluation, 2, 143–149.
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314, 497–502.
Simkin, M. V., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2003). Read before you cite! Complex Syst, 14, 269–274.
Simons, K. (2008). The misused impact factor. Science, 322(5899), 165.
Skovsgaard, J. P., & Vanclay, J. K. (2008). Forest site productivity: A review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands. Forestry, 81, 13–31.
Smith, D. R. (2007). Historical development of the journal impact factor and its relevance for occupational health. Industrial Health, 45, 730–742.
Sombatsompop, N., & Markpin, T. (2005). Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 676–683.
Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., & Premkamolnetr, N. (2004). A modified method for calculating the impact factors of journals in ISI journal citation reports: Polymer science category in 1997–2001. Scientometrics, 60, 217–235.
Sonderstrup-Andersen, E. M., & Sonderstrup-Andersen, H. H. K. (2008). An investigation into diabetes researcher’s perceptions of the journal impact factor: Reconsidering evaluating research. Scientometrics, 76, 391–406.
Soreide, K., & Winter, D. C. (2010). Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission. Surgery, 147, 475–480.
Starbuck, W. H. (2005). How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16, 180–200.
Statzner, B., & Resh, V. H. (2010). Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: Potential causes and consequences. Freshwater Biology, 55, 2639–2653.
Stein, R. J., Haddock, C. K., Poston, W. S. C., Catanese, D., & Spertus, J. A. (2005). Precision in weighing: A comparison of scales found in physician offices, fitness centers, and weight loss centers. Public Health Reports, 120, 266–270.
Stiftel, B., & Mukhopadhyay, C. (2007). Thoughts on Anglo-American hegemony in planning scholarship: Do we read each other’s work? Town Planning Review, 78, 545–572.
Straub, D. W., & Anderson, C. (2009). Journal self-citation VI: Forced journal self-citation: Common, appropriate, ethical? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25, 57–66.
Tal, A., & Gordon, J. (2010). Carbon cautious: Israel’s afforestation experience and approach to sequestration. Small-Scale Forestry, 9, 409–428.
Taylor, M., Perakakis, P., & Trachana, V. (2008). The siege of science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 17–40.
Thomson Reuters (2011). Journal citation reports. Thomson reuters products and services. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/journal_citation_reports/. Accessed 2011 August 16.
Timuralp, B. (2010). Our first impact factor. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, 10(4), 297.
Tobin, M. J. (2002). AJRCCM’s policy on duplicate publication. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 433–437.
Todd, P. A., & Ladle, R. J. (2008). Hidden dangers of a ‘citation culture’. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 13–16.
Todd, P. A., Guest, J. R., Lu, J., & Chou, L. M. (2010). One in four citations in marine biology papers is inappropriate. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 408, 299–303.
Ugolini, D., Bogliolo, A., Parodi, S., Casilli, C., & Santi, L. (1997). Assessing research productivity in an oncology research institute: The role of the documentation center. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 85, 33–38.
Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., & Warner, S. (2004). Rethinking scholarly communication: Building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib Magazine, 10, 9.
Van Driel, M., De Maeseneer, J., De Sutter, A., De Bacquer, D., De Backer, G., & Christiaens, T. (2008). How scientific is the assessment of the quality of scientific output using the journal impact factor? [Hoe wetenschappelijk is het beoordelen van wetenschappelijk werk aan de hand van impactfactoren van tijdschriften?]. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 64, 471–476.
Van Gyseghem, E., Baert, L., Van Remoortere, P., van ‘t Klooster, G., Rouan, M.-C., Voorspoels, J., de Kock, H., Schueller, L., Rosier, J., Grooten, L., & Van den Mooter, G. (2010) Co-administration of darunavir and a new pharmacokinetic booster: Formulation strategies and evaluation in dogs. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 41, 193–200.
Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Critical comments on institute for scientific information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 189–198.
Vanclay, J. K. (2009). Bias in the journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 78, 3–12.
Vlosky, R. P., & Ozanne, L. K. (1997). Forest products certification: The business customer perspective. Wood and Fiber Science, 29, 195–208.
Wager, E., Fiack, S., Graf, C., Robinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 348–353.
Wagner, A. B. (2009). Percentile-based journal impact factors: A neglected collection development metric. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 57.
Walter, G., Bloch, S., Hunt, G., & Fisher, K. (2003). Counting on citations: A flawed way to measure quality. Medical Journal of Australia, 178(6), 280–281.
Wang, S., Wang, H., & Weldon, P. R. (2010). Effect of cooperation between Chinese scientific journals and international publishers on journals’ impact factor. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 233–238.
Weale, A. R., Bailey, M., & Lear, P. A. (2004). The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: A comparison to the impact factor. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 14.
Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. American society for information science and technology monograph series, Information Today, Inc (p. 342). ISBN 9781573871006.
Williams, G. (2007). Should we ditch impact factors? BMJ, 334, 568.
Winkmann, G., & Schweim, H. G. (2000). Biomedical databases and the journal impact factor [Medizinisch-biowissenschaftliche datenbanken und der impact-faktor]. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 125, 1133–1141.
Winkmann, G., Schlutius, S., & Schweim, H. G. (2002). Publication languages of Impact factor journals and of medical bibliographic databanks [Publikationssprachen der Impact Faktor-zeitschriften und medizinischer literaturdatenbanken]. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 127, 131–137.
Woelfel, J. (1993). Artificial neural networks in policy research: A current assessment. Journal of Communication, 43, 63–80.
Woelfel, J., Woelfel, J. (1997). ThoughtView version 2.0, Galileo Corporation.
Woolgar, S. (1991). Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy. Science and Public Policy, 18, 319–326.
Wulff, J. L., & Nixon, N. D. (2004). Quality markers and use of electronic journals in an academic health sciences library. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 315–322.
Xiao, H., Yuan, F., & Wu, J.-G. (2009). Factors affecting citations: A comparison between Chinese and English journals in ecology. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20, 1253–1262.
Yu, G., & Wang, L. (2007). The self-cited rate of scientific journals and the manipulation of their impact factors. Scientometrics, 73, 321–330.
Yu, G., Yang, D.-H., & He, H.-X. (2011). An automatic recognition method of journal impact factor manipulation. Journal of Information Science, 37, 235–245.
Yue, W., Wilson, C. S., & Boller, F. (2007). Peer assessment of journal quality in clinical neurology. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95, 70–76.
Zetterstrom, R. (1999). Impact factor and the future of Acta Paediatrica and other European medical journals. Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, 88, 793–796.
About this article
Cite this article
Vanclay, J.K. Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?. Scientometrics 92, 211–238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0
- Thomson Reuters
- Journal impact factor
- Quality control
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)