Abstract
This study analyzes the level of co-authorship of Spanish research in Library and Information Science (LIS) until 2009, the chronological development that has taken place, and the level of local, domestic and international cooperation. This bibliometric study was made using the data retrieved from the Web of Knowledge (WoK) following a dual strategy—on the one hand through the filter of the category Information Science & Library Science, and on the other hand through a subject search. In this way a significant number of works has been retrieved, some of which are in journals indexed in SCI or A&HCI and not in the SSCI. The results show a significant increase in all co-authorship, including publications in English and those involving international collaboration. As with the increase in Spanish participation in social science (WoK), this growth, coupled with the significant increase in Spanish scientific production in the area of LIS, suggests that the discipline in Spain has entered a more mature phase—although so far it has focused particularly on bibliometric studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.
Ardanuy, J., Urbano, C., & Quintana, L. (2009). A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974–2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanistic studies in minority languages. Scientometrics, 81(2), 347–366.
Avkiran, N. K. (1997). Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, 39(2), 173–184.
Bahr, A. H., & Zemon, M. (2000). Collaborative authorship in the journal literature: Perspectives for academic librarians who wish to publish. College and Research Libraries, 61, 410–419.
Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honour of Eugene Garfield (pp. 197–213). New Jersey: ASIS.
Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and internationals scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279–295.
Bourke, P. (1997). Discipline boundaries in the social sciences. Canberra: Academy of the Social Sciences.
Cano, V. (1999). Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(8), 675–680.
Chang, H.-W. (2009). A bibliometric analysis of Asian authorship pattern in JASIST 1981-2005. In Asia-Pacific conference on library & information education & practice. Tsukuba: Japan University of Tsukuba. http://www.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/~atsushi/a-liep/proceedings/Papers/a31.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2011.
Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855–871.
Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 160–168.
Ding, Y., Foo, S., & Chowdhury, G. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of information retrieval. The International Information & Library Review, 30, 367–376.
EC3. (2009). In-recs (índice de impacto de las Revistas Españolas de Ciencias Sociales). http://ec3.ugr.es/in-recs/ii/Documentacion-fecha-2009.htm. Accessed 6 May 2011.
Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 540–553.
Frías, J. A., & Romero-Gómez, P. (1998). ¿Quiénes son y qué citan los investigadores que publican en las revistas españolas de biblioteconomía y documentación? Anales de Documentación, 1, 29–53.
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
Glanzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50, 461–473.
Harman, G. (2001). University–industry research partnerships in Australia: Extent, benefits and risks. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(3), 245–264.
Harsanyi, M. A. (1993). Multiple authors, multiple problems—bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review. Library and Information Science Review, 15, 325–354.
Hart, R. L. (2007). Collaboration and article quality in the literature of academic librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 190–195.
Iribarren-Maestro, I., Lascurain-Sánchez, M. L., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2009). Are multi-authorship and visibility related? Study of ten research areas at Carlos III University of Madrid. Scientometrics, 79(1), 191–200.
Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2002). L’aportació espanyola a la producció científica internacional en biblioteconomia i documentació, un balanç de deu anys (1992–2001). BiD. Textos universitaris en biblioteconomia i documentació, 9. http://www.ub.edu/bid/09jimen1.htm. Accessed 6 May 2011.
Jiménez-Contreras, E., Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2006). Producción española en biblioteconomía y documentación con visibilidad internacional a través del Web of science (1995–2004). El professional de la información, 15(5), 373–383.
Jiménez-Contreras, E., & Moya-Anegón, F. (1997). Análisis de la autoría en revistas españolas de biblioteconomía y documentación. 1975-1995. Revista española de documentación científica, 20(3), 252–266.
Jiménez-Hidalgo, S. (2007). Análisis de la autoría en la Revista Española de Documentación Científica (1997–2005). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 30(3), 305–322.
Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23–36.
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
Keat, Y.C., & Kaur, K. (2008). Citation study of library & information dissertations for collection development. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(2), 29–47. http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/sudhier-dileepkumar.htm. Accessed 6 May 2011.
Lawani, S. M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1–2), 13–25.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 434–442.
Loan-Clarke, J., & Preston, D. (2002). Tensions and benefits in collaborative research involving a university and another organization. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 169–185.
López-Gijón, J., Pérez López, A., & Ruiz de Villegas del Coso, M. (1995). Siete Jornadas Bibliotecarias de Andalucía, un análisis. In VIII Jornadas Bibliotecarias de Andalucía (pp. 89–112). Huelva: Diputación Provincial.
Molteni, V., & Zulueta, M. A. (2002). Análisis de la visibilidad internacional de la producción científica argentina en las Bases de datos Social Science Citation Index y Arts and Humanities Citation Index de 1990–2000: estudio bibliométrico. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 455–465.
Mukherjee, B. (2010). Assessing Asian scholarly research in Library and Information Science: A quantitative view as reflected in “Web of Knowledge”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 90–101.
Naseer, M. M., & Mahmood, K. (2009). LIS research in Pakistan: An analysis of Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal 1998–2007. Library Philosophy and Practice. http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/naseer-mahmood.htm. Accessed 9 March de 2011.
Nieminen, M., & Kaukonen, E. (2001). Universities and R&D networking in a knowledge-based economy: A glance at Finnish developments. Helsinki: Sitra. http://www.ub.es/bid/bid09.htm. Accessed 30 Aug 2011.
Ocholla, D. N., & Ocholla, L. (2007). Research in Library and Information Science in South Africa: An analysis of journal research output from 1993–2006. In World library and information congress, 73rd IFLA general conference and council, 19–23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla73/papers/132-Ocholla_Ocholla-en.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2011.
Rijnsoever, F., Hessels, L., & Vandeberg, R. L. J. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37(8), 1255–1266.
Santillán, E., & Valles, J. (2005). Contribución de la revista «Anales de documentación» a la ciencia de la información, panorama bibliométrico. Anales de documentación, 8, 237–246.
Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377.
Wang, Y., Wu, Y. S., Pan, Y. T., Ma, Z., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship. Scientometrics, 62(2), 183–198.
Yan, E., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115–131.
Yazit, N., & Zainab, A. N. (2007). Publication productivity of Malaysian authors and institutions in LIS. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(2), 35–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ardanuy, J. Scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: the Spanish case. Scientometrics 90, 877–890 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0552-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0552-1