The citation distribution of a researcher shows the impact of their production and determines the success of their scientific career. However, its application in scientific evaluation is difficult due to the bi-dimensional character of the distribution. Some bibliometric indexes that try to synthesize in a numerical value the principal characteristics of this distribution have been proposed recently. In contrast with other bibliometric measures, the biases that the distribution tails provoke, are reduced by the h-index. However, some limitations in the discrimination among researchers with different publication habits are presented in this index. This index penalizes selective researchers, distinguished by the large number of citations received, as compared to large producers. In this work, two original sets of indexes, the central area indexes and the central interval indexes, that complement the h-index to include the central shape of the citation distribution, are proposed and compared.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273–289.
Anderson, T., Hankin, R., & Killworth, P. (2008). Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 76(3), 577–588.
Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1), 179–189.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h-index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385.
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2007), The b-index as a measure of scientific excellence. A promising supplement to the h-index? Cybermetrics, 11(1), paper 6.
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2010). The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 407–414.
Burrell, Q. L. (2007a). Hirsch’s h-index: A stochastic model. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 16–25.
Burrell, Q. L. (2007b). Hirsch index or Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang’s data. Scientometrics, 73(1), 19–28.
Burrell, Q. L. (2009). On Hirsch’s Egghe’s and Kosmulski’s h(2). Scientometrics, 79(1), 79–91.
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro-level. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 193–203.
Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275–1278.
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.
Glänzel, W. (2006). On the h-index. A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315–321.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the h-index have predictive power. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(49), 19193–19198.
Imperial, J., & Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2007). Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics, 71(2), 271–282.
Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863.
Liang, L. (2006). h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1), 153–159.
Panaretos, J., & Malesios, C. (2009). Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics, 81(3), 635–670.
Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. Y. (2008). A proposal for a dynamic h-type index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1853–1855.
Saad, G. (2006). Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively. Scientometrics, 69(1), 117–120.
Schreiber, M. (2008a). A modification of the h-index: The h(m)-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 211–216.
Schreiber, M. (2008b). The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g-index. Scientometrics, 76(1), 187–200.
Schreiber, M. (2010). A new family of old Hirsch index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 647–651.
Van-Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparisons of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491–502.
Waltman, L., & Van-Eck, N. J. (2009). A taxonomy of bibliometric performance indicators based on the property of consistency. Accessed January, 2011, from http://repub.eur.nl/resource/pub_15182.
Wohlin, C. (2009). A new index for the citation curve of researchers. Scientometrics, 81(2), 521–533.
Zhang, C. T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5429.
This research was partially financed by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, grant ECO2008-05589.
About this article
Cite this article
Dorta-González, P., Dorta-González, MI. Central indexes to the citation distribution: a complement to the h-index. Scientometrics 88, 729 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0453-3
- Citation analysis
- Bibliometric indexes
- Research career evaluation
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)
- 62-07 Data analysis