Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the different forms of and tries to give reasons for international scientific collaboration in general. It focuses on eleven countries in the Asia–Pacific region by evaluating their national research output with the help of bibliometric indicators in particular. Over two million journal articles published by these countries between 1998 and 2007 in ISI-listed periodicals are analyzed. Discipline-specific publication and citation profiles reveal national strengths and weaknesses in the different research domains. The exponential increase in publication output by China over the last few years is astonishing, but in terms of visibility, i.e. citation rates, China cannot keep up with leading science nations, remaining below the world average. A discipline-specific analysis shows that Chinese authors took an active part in more than a quarter of all articles and reviews published in the field of materials science in 2007, while their contribution to medical research is very low. Co-publication networks among the eleven countries are generated to observe the development of cooperation bonds in the region. Applying Salton’s measure of international collaboration strength, an above-average strengthening of scientific collaboration in the Asia–Pacific region can be observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The analyzed countries will be further referred to as AsiaPacific countries.

  2. AUS = Australia, CHN = China, IDN = Indonesia, JPN = Japan, MYS = Malaysia, NZL = New Zealand SGP = Singapore, KOR = South Korea, TWN = Taiwan, THA = Thailand, VNM = Vietnam.

  3. The countries were chosen to represent a mixed sample set in terms of output and location.

  4. Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea and Ukraine.

References

  • Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226–2239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, H.-D., Gerke, S., & Schweißhelm, R. (2004). Malaysia, Singapur, Indonesien: Wege zur Wissensgesellschaft. South East Asian Studies Working Paper No. 20. Bonn: Department of Southeast Asian Studies, University of Bonn. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/evifa/documents/books/reV5yMIeTTSYI/PDF/239Wf25iK8dcI.pdf.

  • Frame, J. D., Narin, F., & Carpenter, M. P. (1977). Distribution of world science. Social Studies of Science, 7(4), 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L. (1997) Global cooperation in research (Vol. 27, pp. 611–626). In Paper presented at the conference on the past and future of EU research funding-framework programmes under consideration, June 16–17, Helsinki, Finland.

  • Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2007). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The Use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, I., & Méndez, A. (1992). Are peripheral countries profiting from scientific cooperation networks? In P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, & M. Winterhager (Eds.), Representations of science and technology: Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 112–123). Leiden: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J. C., & Ma, N. (2007). A bibliometric study of China’s semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics, 70(1), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., Munshi, M., & Mishra, P. K. (2004). Regional collaboration in S&T among South Asian countries. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 51(4), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, S., Mittermaier, B., & Tunger, D. (2008). Bibliometric analysis Asia-Pacific Research area commissioned by the International Bureau of the BMBF at DLR. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://www.kooperation-international.de/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/redaktion/doc/Bibliometrie_Asien_englisch_neu.pdf&t=1268142711&hash=311621d7ca9cd94af219c315eb9ba97e.

  • Inonu, E. (2003). The influence of cultural factors on scientific production. Scientometrics, 56(1), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Hicks, D., Narin, F., & Hamilton, K. (1996). International collaboration. Nature, 381(6577), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 63(2), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Networks of international scientific collaboration. In P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, & M. Winterhager (Eds.), Representations of science and technology: Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 95–111). Leiden: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, C., & Moore, T. (2008, October). China goes from strength to strength. Inspec Matters.

  • Moed, H. F. (2002). Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53(3), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, Y., Dore, J. C., Ojasoo, T., & Miquel, J. F. (1998). A multivariate analysis of publication trends in the 1980s with special reference to south-east Asia. Scientometrics, 41(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1986). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 19(1–2), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunger, D. (2009). Bibliometrische Verfahren und Methoden als Beitrag zur Trendbeobachtung und -erkennung in den Naturwissenschaften. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Zentralbibliothek, Verlag. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://epub.uni-regensburg.de/12294/1/Bibliothek_19_uni.pdf.

  • Tunger, D., & Haustein, S. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of the Asia-Pacific research area: Issues and results. In Proceedings of ISSI 2009—12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. 2, pp. 996–997).

  • Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wong, A., & Yoda, T. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries? Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1357.0.pdf.

  • Wagner, C. S., Yezril, A., & Hassell, S. (2001). International cooperation in research and development. An update to an inventory to U.S. government spending. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1248.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the International Bureau of BMBF for commissioning the underlying study. We would also like to thank the Bibliometrics department in the Central Library at Forschungszentrum Jülich for comprehensive technical support and Janet Carter-Sigglow and Hazel Burlet at the Language Services for proofreading this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Tunger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haustein, S., Tunger, D., Heinrichs, G. et al. Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?. Scientometrics 86, 727–746 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0295-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0295-4

Keywords

Navigation