Skip to main content

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics

Abstract

The trend to use administrative health care databases as research material is increasing but not well explored. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), one of the largest administrative health care databases around the world, has been used widely in academic studies. This study analyzed 383 NHIRD studies published between 2000 and 2009 to quantify the effects on overall growth, scholar response, and spread of the study fields. The NHIRD studies expanded rapidly in both quantity and quality since the first study was published in 2000. Researchers usually collaborated to share knowledge, which was crucial to process the NHIRD data. However, once the fundamental problem had been overcome, success to get published became more reproducible. NHIRD studies were also published diversely in a growing number of journals. Both general health and clinical science studies benefited from NHIRD. In conclusion, this new research material widely promotes scientific production in a greater magnitude. The experience of Taiwan’s NHIRD should encourage national- or institutional-level data holders to consider re-using their administrative databases for academic purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. For patients in a chronic and stable disease condition in Taiwan, one is eligible to refill his or her medication in any contracted pharmacy without seeing a doctor again.

  2. The NLM has assigned most of MEDLINE journals with one or more subject terms to describe journals’ overall scopes. The subject terms are all valid MeSH terms and followed the MeSH tree structure ontology. The MeSH tree structure ontology is a hierarchical semantic tree and makes it possible to reorganize subject MeSH terms into higher conceptual levels.

  3. General form of Lotka’s law is R(n) = C/n a, where R(n) is the number of authors that produce n studies, C is a constant characteristic of the research field, and a is called “Lotka’s exponent” ranges approximately from value of 2–4 (Hayes 2000).

References

  • Berger, M. L., Mamdani, M., Atkins, D., & Johnson, M. L. (2009). Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report-part I. Value in Health, 12(8), 1044–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. J., Chen, Y. C., Hwang, S. J., & Chou, L. F. (2007). International collaboration of clinical medicine research in Taiwan, 1990–2004: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 70(3), 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeShazo, J. P., LaVallie, D. L., & Wolf, F. M. (2009). Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of “Medical Informatics” in MeSH. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 9, 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, C. C., Mostashari, F., & Shirky, C. (2009). Collecting and sharing data for population health: A new paradigm. Health Affairs, 28(2), 454–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2005). Power laws in the information production process: Lotkaian informetrics. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

  • Fernandez-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., & Vallejo, M. (2004). Reconsidering Price’s model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics, 61(3), 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., & Karisiddappa, C. R. (2000). Modeling the growth of literature in the area of theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 49(2), 321–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpe, S. E. (2009). Using secondary data sources for pharmaco-epidemiology and outcomes research. Pharmacotherapy, 29(2), 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. M. (2000). The mathematical foundations of bibliometrics. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. New Jersey, USA: Information Today.

  • Hoffmann, F. (2009). Review on use of German health insurance medication claims data for epidemiological research. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 18(5), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, F. Y., Yang, C. L., Huang, Y. T., & Huang, W. F. (2007). Using Taiwan’s national health insurance research databases for pharmacoepidemiology research. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 15(2), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambiotte, R., & Panzarasa, P. (2009). Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. (2008). Knowledge network hubs and measures of research impact, science structure, and publication output in nanostructured solar cell research. Scientometrics, 74(1), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2010). A user-friendly method for generating overlay maps. Retrieved Jan 15, 2010 from http://users.fmg.uva.nl/lleydesdorff/overlaytoolkit/.

  • National Library of Medicine (2010). NLM Catalog. Retrieved Jan 15, 2010 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=nlmcatalog.

  • Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of inter-disciplinarity: Case studies in bio-nanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiss, S., & Avorn, J. (2005). A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCI & SSCI (2007). Retrieved Jan 15, 2010 from http://isiknowledge.com/.

  • SCI & SSCI (2008). Retrieved Jan 15, 2010 from http://isiknowledge.com/.

  • Szydlowski, M., & Krawiec, A. (2009). Growth cycles of knowledge. Scientometrics, 78(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricco, A. C., Pham, B., & Rawson, N. S. B. (2008). Manitoba and Saskatchewan administrative health care utilization databases are used differently to answer epidemiologic research questions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 192–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers who generously contributed their valuable view points and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Chun Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, YC., Yeh, HY., Wu, JC. et al. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics. Scientometrics 86, 365–380 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0289-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0289-2

Keywords

  • Administrative health care database
  • National Health Insurance Research Database
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Knowledge growth