, Volume 86, Issue 3, pp 629–643 | Cite as

The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research

  • Giovanni Abramo
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
  • Marco Solazzi


Policy makers, at various levels of governance, generally encourage the development of research collaboration. However the underlying determinants of collaboration are not completely clear. In particular, the literature lacks studies that, taking the individual researcher as the unit of analysis, attempt to understand if and to what extent the researcher’s scientific performance might impact on his/her degree of collaboration with foreign colleagues. The current work examines the international collaborations of Italian university researchers for the period 2001–2005, and puts them in relation to each individual’s research performance. The results of the investigation, which assumes co-authorship as proxy of research collaboration, show that both research productivity and average quality of output have positive effects on the degree of international collaboration achieved by a scientist.


Research collaboration Internationalization Research performance University Bibliometrics Italy 


  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2008a). Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University-industry collaboration in Italy: An extensive bibliometric survey. Technovation, 29, 498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2008b). The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76(2), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abt, H. A. (2007). The frequencies of multinational papers in various sciences. Scientometrics, 72(1), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA. Technovation, 24, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glänzel, W., & De Lange, C. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. He, Z. L., Geng, X. S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hicks, D. M., & Katz, J. S. (1996). Where is science going? Science Technology and Human Values, 21(4), 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale independent indicators and research assessment. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moed H. F., Glänzel W., & Schmoch U. (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S & T Systems. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Moravcsik, M. J. (1985). Applied scientometrics: an assessment methodology for developing countries. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Olmeda Gomez, C., Perianes Rodriguez, A., Ovalle Perandones, M. A., Guerrero Bote, V. P., & Moya Anegon, F. D. (2009). Visualization of scientific co-authorship in Spanish universities: From regionalization to internationalization. Aslib Proceedings, 61(1), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmoch, U. (2005). Leistungsfähigkeit und Strukturen der Wissenschaft im Internationalen Vergleich 2004, Bericht zur Technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit, Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 6-2005, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
  18. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Suárez-Balseiro, C., García-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2009). Multi-authorship and its impact on the visibility of research from Puerto Rico. Information Processing and Management, 45, 469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(4), 565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zitt M., & Bassecoulard E. (2004). S&T networks and bibliometrics: The case of international scientific collaboration. 4th Proximity Congress: Proximity, Networks and Co-ordination, Marseille (France), 2004/06/17–18, 15 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Abramo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    • 1
  • Marco Solazzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer, Department of Management, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’ImpresaSchool of Engineering, Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  2. 2.National Research Council of ItalyPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations