Abstract
This article reports the results of a scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community countries. The National Science Indicators database of Thomson-Reuters and the online ISI Web of Knowledge are utilized in order to identify the number of publications of the 15 countries over a period of 15 years; the activity and relative impact indicators of 22 scientific disciplines for each country and their collaborative patterns. It is identified that South Africa with 19% of the population in the region is responsible for 60% of the regional GDP and 79% of the regions publications. All countries tend to have the same focus in their disciplinary priorities and underemphasize disciplines such as engineering, materials science and molecular biology. It is expressed concern that the current research infrastructures are inadequate to assist in reaching the objectives developed in the Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan of the Community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
De Solla Price, D. (1975). The productivity of research scientists. In: Yearbook of science and the future. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., University of Chicago.
DST. (2008). Ten year innovation plan. Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology.
Frame, D. J. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2, 143–148.
Ingwersen, P., & Jacobs, D. (2004). South African research in selected scientific areas: Status 1981–2000. Scientometrics, 59(3), 405–423.
Jeenah, M., & Pouris, A. (2008). South African research in the context of Africa and globally. South African Journal of Science, 104(September–October), 351–354.
King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311–316.
Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278–287.
Lubango, M. L., & Pouris, A. (2007). Industry work experience and inventive capacity of South African academic researchers. Technovation: The International Journal of Technological Innovation Entrepreneurship and Technology Management, 27, 788–796.
Molatudi, M., & Pouris, A. (2006). Assessing the knowledge base for biotechnology in South Africa: A bibliometric analysis of South African microbiology and molecular biology and genetics research. Scientometrics, 1(1), 97–108.
Mpanza, F. (2009). Overview of SADC science, technology and innovation priorities. Presentation retrieved October 2009 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/250626/Overview%20of%20STI%20priorities-version%202.pdf.
Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Russell, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., & Gaillard, J. (2002). Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output. Scientometrics, 54, 229–241.
Pouris, A. (1996). The writing on the wall of South African science: A scientometric assessment. South African Journal of Science, 92(6), 267–271.
Pouris, A. (2005). An assessment of the impact and visibility of South African journals. Scientometrics, 62(2), 213–222.
Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79(2), 297–309.
Roland, E. (2007). On the use and abuse of bibliometric indicators: A critique of Hix’s global ranking of political departments. European Political Science, 6(3), 306–314.
SADC. (1992). The Treaty of the Southern African Development Community (as amended in 2001). Namibia: Windhoek.
SADC. (2003). Regional indicative strategic development plan. SADC Secretariat. Retrieved November 2009 from http://www.transport.gov.za/siteimgs/RISDP-16Jul2003.pdf.
Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1996). Cross field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 36(3), 311–324.
Schubert, T., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics, 83(1), 181–203.
Schubert, A., & Telcs, A. (1986). Publication potential—an indicator of scientific strength for cross-national comparisons. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 231–238.
Shrum, W. (1997). View from afar: ‘Visible’ productivity of scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics, 40, 215–235.
Tijssen, J. W. R. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the world research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303–327.
United Nations. (2004). Promoting the application of science and technology to meet the development goals contained in the millennium declaration. Commission on Science and Technology for Development; Economic and Social Council, E/CN.16/2003/2.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Miss Androniki EM. Pouris for research support, and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pouris, A. A scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community: science in the tip of Africa. Scientometrics 85, 145–154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0260-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0260-2