Skip to main content
Log in

Does Urquhart’s Law hold for consortial use of electronic journals?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tests the validity of Urquhart’s Law (“the inter-library loan demand for a periodical is as a rule a measure of its total use”). It compares the use of print journals at the Turkish Academic Network and Information Center (ULAKBIM) with the consortial use of the same journals in their electronic form by the individual libraries making up the Consortium of Turkish University Libraries (ANKOS). It also compares the on-site use of electronic journals at ULAKBIM with their consortial use at ANKOS. About 700 thousand document delivery, in-house and on-site use data and close to 28 million consortial use data representing seven years’ worth of downloads of full-text journal articles were used. Findings validate Urquhart’s Law in that a positive correlation was observed between the use of print journals at ULAKBIM and the consortial use of their electronic copies at ANKOS. The on-site and consortial use of electronic journals was also highly correlated. Both print and electronic journals that were used most often at ULAKBIM tend to get used heavily by the member libraries of ANKOS consortium, too. Findings can be used in developing consortial collection management policies and negotiate better consortial licence agreements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bensman, S. J. (2005a). Urquhart’s Law: Probability and the management of scientific and technical journal collections: Part 1. The Law’s initial formulation and statistical bases. Science & Technology Libraries, 26(1), 31–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensman, S. J. (2005b). Urquhart’s Law: Probability and the management of scientific and technical journal collections: Part 2. Probability in the development and management of a central document delivery collection. Science & Technology Libraries, 26(2), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensman, S. J. (2005c). Urquhart’s Law: Probability and the management of scientific and technical journal collections: Part 3. The Law’s final formulation and implications for library systems. Science & Technology Libraries, 26(2), 33–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensman, S. J. (2005d). Urquhart and probability: The transition from librarianship to library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(2), 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatten, J. N., & Sanville, T. (2004). An orderly retreat from the big deal: Is it possible for consortia? D-Lib Magazine, 10(10). Retrieved January 16, 2009, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october04/gatten/10gatten.html.

  • Karasözen, B. (2008). Consortial usage of electronic journals in Turkey. Paper presented at the 37th LIBER annual general conference, Koç University, Istanbul, July 1–5, 2008. Retrieved January 16, 2009, from http://eprints.rclis.org/14862/1/Turkishunilib.pdf.

  • Karasözen, B., Kaygusuz, A., & Özen, H. B. (2007). Patterns of e-journal use within the Anatolian University Library Consortium. Serials, 20(1), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasözen, B., & Lindley, J. A. (2004). The impact of ANKOS: Consortium development in Turkey. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30, 402–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, H.-R., Kwakkelaar, R., Tai, Y.-M., & Chen, L.-C. (2002). Exploring behavior of e-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier’s ScienceDirect OnSite in Taiwan. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, W. H. (1962). Survey of the interlibrary loan operation of the National Library of Medicine. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D. H., & Clintworth, W. A. (2000). Comparing patterns of print and electronic journal use in an academic health science library. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 28. Retrieved January 16, 2009, from http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/00-fall/refereed.html.

  • Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., & Tenopir, C. (2006). What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals: Case study OhioLINK. Journal of Documentation, 62, 482–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özen, H. (2007). Elektronik dergilerde kullanım analizi: ANKOS ve ODTÜ örneği. In S. Kurbanoğlu, Y. Tonta & U. Al (Eds.), Değişen Dünyada Bilgi Yönetimi Sempozyumu, 24–26 Ekim 2007, Ankara, Bildiriler (pp. 201–208). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yön. Bölümü.

  • Scales, P. A. (1976). Citation analyses as indicators of the use of serials: A comparison of ranked title lists produced by citation counting and from use data. Journal of Documentation, 31, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ScienceDirect. (2009). Retrieved January 18, 2009, from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/electronicproductdescription.cws_home/622109/description#description.

  • Tonta, Y., & Ünal, Y. (2008). Consortial use of electronic journals in Turkish universities. In L. Chan & S. Mornati (Eds.). Open scholarship: Authority, community and sustainability in the age of web 2.0: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on electronic publishing. Toronto, June 25–27, 2008 (pp. 203–216). Toronto: International Conference on Electronic Publishing. Retrieved, January 15, 2009, from http://eprints.rclis.org/14031/1/tonta-unal-elpub-2008-06-26.pdf.

  • Urquhart, D. J. (1959). Use of scientific periodicals. In Proceedings of the international conference on scientific information, Washington, DC, November 16–21, 1958 (Vol. I, pp. 287–300). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. Retrieved, January 15, 2009, from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10866&page=287.

  • Urquhart, D. J., & Bunn, R. M. (1959). A national loan policy for scientific serials. Journal of Documentation, 15, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, J. A., & Urquhart, N. C. (1976). Relegation and stock control in libraries. Stocksfield, England: Oriel Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a research grant of the Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Center (SOBAG-106K068). We thank ULAKBIM and publishers for making the use data available; especially Uğur Yılmaz of ULAKBIM, Hatim El Faiz of Elsevier, Zeynep Niksarlı of Swets, and Burcu Keten of Ankara University. We also thank Dr. Stephen J. Bensman of Louisiana State University for his meticulous reading of an earlier version of this paper and for his invaluable suggestions. Any remaining errors are of our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yurdagül Ünal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tonta, Y., Ünal, Y. Does Urquhart’s Law hold for consortial use of electronic journals?. Scientometrics 83, 793–808 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0156-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0156-1

Keywords

Navigation