Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics

Abstract

Contemporary scholarly discourse follows many alternative routes in addition to the three-century old tradition of publication in peer-reviewed journals. The field of High-Energy Physics (HEP) has explored alternative communication strategies for decades, initially via the mass mailing of paper copies of preliminary manuscripts, then via the inception of the first online repositories and digital libraries. This field is uniquely placed to answer recurrent questions raised by the current trends in scholarly communication: is there an advantage for scientists to make their work available through repositories, often in preliminary form? Is there an advantage to publishing in Open Access journals? Do scientists still read journals or do they use digital repositories? The analysis of citation data demonstrates that free and immediate online dissemination of preprints creates an immense citation advantage in HEP, whereas publication in Open Access journals presents no discernible advantage. In addition, the analysis of clickstreams in the leading digital library of the field shows that HEP scientists seldom read journals, preferring preprints instead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    With the term “green” Open Access we denote the free online availability of scholarly publications in a repository. In the case of HEP, the submission to these repositories, typically arXiv, is not mandated by universities or funding agencies, but is a free choice of authors seeking peer recognition and visibility.

  2. 2.

    With the term “gold” Open Access we denote the free online availability of a scholarly publication on the web site of a scientific journals.

  3. 3.

    SPIRES is about to be replaced by a new platform, INSPIRE, jointly realised by the SPIRES partners (DESY, Fermilab, and SLAC) and CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. INSPIRE will add novel functionalities to SPIRES, such as search speed, full-text search, text- and data-mining capabilities, and capture of user-generated content.

    More details are available at www.projecthepinspire.net.

  4. 4.

    In HEP, five journals publish the vast majority of the articles of the field: European Physical Journal C, Journal of High Energy Physics, Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B, Physical Review D. They contain mostly HEP content. Another journal, Physical Review Letters, only carries about 10% of HEP content. It is not included in Fig. 1, however its content is almost entirely on arXiv (Mele et al. 2006; Bianco et al., http://scoap3.org/files/Scoap3WPReport.pdf).

  5. 5.

    The slight decrease in the year 2004 is due to a large conference proceedings published in one journal (European Physical Journal C) whereby most of this material was not submitted to arXiv, as sometimes customary in HEP for some conference proceedings built on existing material.

  6. 6.

    We restrict our analysis to just two of the five larger journals of the field in order to simplify data handling. However, it is worth remarking that these two journals collectively cover about ½ of the published HEP literature and are therefore representative of the behaviour of the entire data set.

  7. 7.

    The analysis is restricted to citations appearing in the first two years after publication, since JHEP has an Open Access embargo policy, which makes all articles Open Access two years after they are published.

References

  1. Addis, L. (1962–1994). Brief and biased history of preprint and database activities at the SLAC Library. Last visited June 28, 2009, from http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/papers/history.html.

  2. ArXiv website. Last visited June 28, 2009, from http://www.arXiv.org.

  3. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries, 65, 372–382.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aymar, R. (2009). Scholarly communication in High-Energy Physics: Past, present and future innovations. European Review, 17, 33–51. (CERN-OPEN-2008-015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bianco, S., et al., Report of the SCOAP3 Working Party, ISBN 978-92-9083-292-8. Last visited June 28, 2009, from http://scoap3.org/files/Scoap3WPReport.pdf.

  6. Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, P. M., & Fromerth, M. J. (2007). Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics, 71, 202–215. arXiv:cs/0603056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, P. M., et al. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads and citations: Randomised trial. BMJ, 337, a568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of Open Access articles. PLoS Biology, 4, 692–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gentil-Beccot, A., et al. (2009). Information resources in High-Energy Physics: Surveying the present landscape and charting the future course. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 150–160. arXiv:cs.DL/0804.2701v2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ginsparg, P. (1994). First steps towards electronic research communication. Computers in Physics, 8, 390.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (2002). Communication patterns in High-Energy Physics. High Energy Physics Libraries Webzine, 6. Last visited June 28, 2009, from http://library.cern.ch/HEPLW/6/papers/1/.

  14. Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10.

  15. Heuer, R. D., Holtkamp, A., & Mele, S. (2008). Innovation in scholarly communication: Vision and projects from High-Energy Physics. Information Services & Use, 28, 83–96. arXiv:0805.2739.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kreitz, P. A., & Brooks, T. C. (2003). Subject access through community partnerships: A case study. Science & Technology Libraries, 24, 153. arXiv:physics/0309027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kunz, P., et al., The Early World Wide Web at SLAC. Last visited June 28, 2009, from http://www.slac.stanford.edu/history/earlyweb/history.shtml.

  18. Kurtz, M., & Henneken, E. (2007). Open Access does not increase citations for research articles from The Astrophysical Journal. arXiv:0709.0896.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SPIRES Website. Last visited June 28, 2009, from http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires.

  20. SISSA Open Access Proposal. Last visited June 28, 2009, from http://jhep.sissa.it/jhep/docs/SISSA_IOP_OA_proposal.pdf.

  21. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411, 521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mele, S., et al. (2006). Quantitative analysis of the publishing landscape in High-Energy Physics. Journal of High Energy Physics, 12, S01. arXiv:cs.DL/0611130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Metcalfe, T. (2004). The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. Solar Physics, 239, 549–553. arXiv:astro-ph/0607079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of open access on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2047–2054. arXiv:cs/0611060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The SCOAP3 project is described at http://scoap3.org. Last visited June 28, 2009.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work partly supported by Department of Energy contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. We are indebted to Carmen van Pamel and Nicholas Steketee, on an internship from the Collège du Léman, for their collaboration in the analysis of the data published in this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Gentil-Beccot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S. & Brooks, T.C. Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics. Scientometrics 84, 345–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0111-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Open-Access
  • Citation
  • High-energy physics
  • Repository