Skip to main content

hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices

Abstract

To be able to measure the scientific output of researchers is an increasingly important task to support research assessment decisions. To do so, we can find several different measures and indices in the literature. Recently, the h-index, introduced by Hirsch in 2005, has got a lot of attention from the scientific community for its good properties to measure the scientific production of researchers. Additionally, several different indicators, for example, the g-index, have been developed to try to improve the possible drawbacks of the h-index. In this paper we present a new index, called hg-index, to characterize the scientific output of researchers which is based on both h-index and g-index to try to keep the advantages of both measures as well as to minimize their disadvantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 436(7053), 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?—a comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist, 19(22), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2007).On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin’s A-index. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 170–177.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, A. (2005). Your career in a number. Science Now, http://www.sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2005/812/1. Accessed 26.06.2008.

  • Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006a). An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8–9.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006b). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2007). Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 452–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2006). An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, J. E., & Pecharromán, C. (2007). Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73, 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B. (2007). The AR-index: Complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 3(1), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, J. M. & Thelwall, M. (2007). Two new indicators derived from the h-index for comparing citation impact: Hirsch frequencies and the normalised Hirsch index. In D. Torres-Salinas & H.F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (Vol 2, pp. 876–877). Madrid, Spain: Spanish Research Council (CSIC).

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36(3), 343–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, A., & Molinari, J. F. (2008). Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. Scientometrics, 75(2), 339–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, C. (2007). Using the h-index to rank infuential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A. (2006). The h index: playing the numbers game. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(8), 422–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus, 1(4), 23–25 (in Chinese). English version available at: E-LIS: code 6376, http://www.eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006376/. Accessed 26.06.2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruane, F., & Tol, R. S. J. (2008). Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland. Scientometrics, 75(2), 395–405.

  • Sidiropoulos, A., & Katsaros, D., Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The holy grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, J. K. (2007). On the robustness of the h-Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the research projects: FUZZY-LING (TIN2007-61079), SAINFOWEB (P05-TIC-00602) and PETRI project PET2007-0460.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Alonso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E. et al. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics 82, 391–400 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5

Keywords

  • h-Index
  • g-Index
  • Bibliometric indicators
  • Research evaluation