Scientometrics

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 333–349 | Cite as

Use of Scopus and Google Scholar to measure social sciences production in four major Spanish universities

Article

Abstract

A large part of Social Sciences and the Humanities do not adapt to international proceedings used in English for scientific output on databases such as the Web of Science and Scopus. The aim of this paper is to show the different results obtained in scientific work by comparing Social Sciences researchers with those of other sciences in four Spanish universities. The first finding is that some Social Sciences researchers are somewhat internationalised. However, the majority of individuals who are prestigious in their local academic-scientific community do not even appear on the information sources mentioned above.

Keywords

Social Sciences production Visibility on international databases Spanish universities 

References

  1. Academic Ranking of World Universities. (2008). Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://www.arwu.org.
  2. Aguado-López, E., & Rogel-Salazar, R. (2006). Redalyc: red de revistas científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal: un balance a tres años de camino. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Consejo Latinoamericano en Ciencias Sociales: Fraga Jorge CLACSO, pp. 209–233. Available in http://www.clacso.org.ar/biblioteca.
  3. Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved November 14, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html .
  4. Bonilla, M., & Pérez-Angon, M. A. (1999). Revistas Mexicanas de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica. Interciencia, 24, 102–106.Google Scholar
  5. Bosman, J., Van Mourik, I., Rasch, M., Sieverts, E., & Verhoeff, H. (2006, June). Scopus reviewed and compared. Utrecht University Library.Google Scholar
  6. Buela-Casal, G., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., & López, W. (2003). Iberindex: Índice Iberoamericano de evaluación de publicaciones científicas. Infocop, 84, 41–44.Google Scholar
  7. Collazo-Reyes, F., Luna-Morales, M. E., Russell, J. M., & Pérez-Angón, M. A. (2008). Publication and citation patterns of Latin American & Caribbean journals in the SCI and SSCI from 1995 to 2004. Scientometrics, 75(1), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronin, B., Snyder, H., & Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53(3), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Moya, F. (2007). Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica Española (1990–2004). FECYT. Retrieved November 29, 2007, from http://sise.fecyt.es.
  10. Echeverría, J., Maltrás, B., & Sequera, R. (2006). La investigación en humanidades: Problemas específicos. In J. Sebastián & E. Muñoz (Eds.), Radiografía de la investigación pública en España (pp. 303–325). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
  11. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing. Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost science in the Third World. Scientific American, 273, 76–83.Google Scholar
  13. Gómez, I., Sancho, R., Bordons, M., & Fernández, M. T. (2006). La I + D en España a través de publicaciones y patentes. In J. Sebastián & E. Muñoz (Eds.), Radiografía de la investigación pública en España (pp. 275–302). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
  14. Google Scholar. (2008). Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://scholar.google.com/scholar/about.html.
  15. Harzing, A. W. (2008). Google Scholar—a new data source for citation analysis. Retrieved April 2, 2008, from http://www.harzing.com/pop_gs.htm.
  16. Hernández, J. (2006). La Universidad española en cifras, Informe 2006. Available in http://www.crue.org/pdf/CRUE%202006.
  17. IN-RECS, Índice de impacto, Revistas Españolas de Ciencias Sociales. http://ec3.ugr.es/in-recs.
  18. Jacso, P. (2005). As we search—comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537–1547.Google Scholar
  19. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leydesdorff, L., & Bihui, J. (2005). Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal–journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 1469–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. (2007). Is there science beyond English? EMBO Reports, 8, 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Osca-Lluch, J., Blesa, P., Barrueco, J. M., Velasco, E., & Krichel, T. (2008). Some aspects of citation indexes in Spain: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 75(2), 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Payne, D. (2004). Google Scholar welcomed. News from The Scientist, 5(1):20041123-01. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://www.the-scientist.com/news/20041123/01/.
  27. QS World University Rankings. (2008). QS quacquarelli symonds. Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://www.topuniversities.com.
  28. Reed Elsevier. (2004). Scopus comes of age. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://www.reed-elsevier.com/index.cfm?Articleid=1075.
  29. Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. (2008). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://www.webometrics.info.
  30. Xin-Ning, S., Xin-Ming, H., & Xin-Ning, H. (2001). Developing the Chinese social science citation index. Online Information Review, 25, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the Basque CountryBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations