Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 397–401 | Cite as

Are highly cited papers more international?

  • Olle PerssonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Several bibliometric studies have shown that international or multicountry papers are generally more cited than domestic or single country papers. Does this also hold for the most cited papers? In this study, the citation impact of domestic versus international papers is analyzed by comparing the share of international papers among the hundred most cited papers in four research specialities, from three universities, four cities and two countries. It is concluded that international papers are not well represented among high impact papers in research specialities, but dominate highly cited papers from small countries, and from cities and institutions within them. The share of international papers among highly cited papers is considerably higher during 2001–2008 compared to earlier years for institutions, cities and countries, but somewhat less for two of the research fields and slightly higher for the other two. Above all, domestic papers from the USA comprise about half of the highly cited papers in the research specialities.

Keywords

Highly cited papers International co-authorships Citation impact 

References

  1. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in International Scientific Co-authorship. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997, June 16–19). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? Bioscience, 55(5), 438–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Luukkonen, T., Sivertsen, G., & Persson, O. (1992). Understanding patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(1), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1990, June 14–15). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Paper presented at the international conference on output indicators for evaluation of the impact of European community research program, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  8. Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 54(3), 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results—some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Strength and weakness of national science systems. A bibliometric analysis through cooperation patterns. Scientometrics, 79(2), 389–408. doi:  10.1007/s11192-009-0426-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, InforskUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations