An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citations. When the citation count of an article exceeds h, however, as is the case for the hundreds or even thousands of citations that accompany the most highly cited papers, no additional credit is given (these citations falling outside the so-called “Durfee square”). We propose a new bibliometric index, the “tapered h-index” (h T), that positively enumerates all citations, yet scoring them on an equitable basis with h.
The career progression of h T and h are compared for six eminent scientists in contrasting fields. Calculated h T for year 2006 ranged between 44.32 and 72.03, with a corresponding range in h of 26 to 44. We argue that the h T-index is superior to h, both theoretically (it scores all citations), and because it shows smooth increases from year to year as compared with the irregular jumps seen in h. Conversely, the original h-index has the benefit of being conceptually easy to visualise. Qualitatively, the two indices show remarkable similarity (they are closely correlated), such that either can be applied with confidence.
Andrews, G. E. (1984), The Theory of Partitions. Cambridge University Press.
Ball, P. (2005), Achievement index climbs the ranks, Nature, 448: 737.
Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., Martinez, A. S. (2006), Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68: 179–189.
Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D. (2005), Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65: 391–392.
Cronin, B., Meho, L. (2006), Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57: 1275–1278.
Egghe, L. (2006), Theory and practise of the g-index, Scientometrics, 69: 131–152.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 16569–16572.
Holden, C. (2005), Random samples: Data point — Impact factor, Science, 309: 1181.
Jin, B. H. (2006), H-index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist, Science Focus, 1: 8–9.
Kostoff, R. N. (2007), The difference between highly and poorly cited medical articles in the journal Lancet. Scientometrics, 72: 513–520.
Liang, L. (2006), H-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications, Scientometrics, 69: 153–159.
Oppenheim, C. (2007), Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58: 297–301.
Opthof, T. (1997), Sense and nonsense about the impact factor, Cardiovascular Research, 33: 1–7.
Opthof, T., Coronel, R., Piper, H. M. (2004), Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation, Cardiovascular Research, 61: 201–203.
Redner, S. (2005), Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review, Physics Today, 58: 49–54.
Saha, S., Saint, S., Christakis, D. A. (2003), Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91: 42–46.
Schreiber, M. (2007), Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index, Europhysics Letters, 78: 1–6.
Seglen, P. O. (1992), The skewness of science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43: 628–638.
van Raan, A. J. F. (2004), Sleeping beauties in science, Scientometrics, 59: 467–472.
Vanclay, J. K. (2007), On the robustness of the h-index, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58: 1547–1550.
Vinkler, P. (2007), Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators, Journal of Information Science, 33: 481–491.
Sadly, after a long and distinguished career, Peter Killworth died on 28 Jan 2008.
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, T.R., Hankin, R.K.S. & Killworth, P.D. Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics 76, 577–588 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2071-2
- Citation Count
- Publication Output
- Career Progression
- Additional Citation