The titles of scientific articles have a special significance. We examined nearly 20 million scientific articles and recorded the development of articles with a question mark at the end of their titles over the last 40 years. Our study was confined to the disciplines of physics, life sciences and medicine, where we found a significant increase from 50% to more than 200% in the number of articles with question-mark titles. We looked at the principle functions and structure of the titles of scientific papers, and we assume that marketing aspects are one of the decisive factors behind the growing usage of question-mark titles in scientific articles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
G. Lewison, J. Hartley, What’s in a title: Numbers of words and the presence of colons, Scientometrics, 63 (2005) 341–356.
L. Adams-Phillips, C. Barry, J. Giovannoni, Signal trasduction systems regulatin fruit ripening, Trends Plant Science, 9 (2004) 331–338.
C. Ross, Huntington’s disease new paths to pathogenesis, Cell, 118 (2004) 4–7.
T. Tyrrell, R. E. Zeebe, History of carbonate ion concentration over the last 100 million years, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68 (2004) 3521–3530.
G. Krapivinsky, I. Medina, L. Krapivinsky, S. Gapon, D. Clapham, SynGAP-MUPP1-CaMKII synaptic complexes regulate p38 MAP kinase activity and NMDA receptor- dependent synaptic AMPA receptor potentiation, Neuron, 43 (2004) 563–574.
All examples taken from: Top 25 Hottest Articles, http://top25.sciencedirect.com/index.php?cat_id=6&subject_area_id=2
W. Schneider, D. Esslinger, Die Überschrift, List Verlag, München, 2002.
M.A. Mabe, M. Amin, Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde: Author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. In: ASLIB Proceedings, 54 (3). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2002 pp.149–157.
B. Simon, Der Teaser — eine multifunktionale Textsorte, Dissertation (2004) 129. 134–139.
G. Myers, The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10 (1989) 1–35.
M. Yitzhaki, Relations of title length of journal articles to number of authors, Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 321–332.
J. A. Perry, The Dillion hypothesis of titular colonicity: En empirical test from the ecological science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (1985) 251–258.
M. Townsend, Tutular colonicity and scholarship — New-Zealand research and scholarly impact, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 12 (1983) 41–43.
J. T. Dillon, The emergence of the colon: An empirical correlate of scholarship, American Psychologist, 36 (1981) 879–884.
J. Hartley, Planning that title: Practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic articles, Library & Information Science Research, 29 (2007) 553–568.
V. Soler, Writing titles in science: An exploratory study, English for Specific Purposes, 26 (2007) 90. 100–102.
A. Alexandrov, M. Hennerici, Writing good abstracts, Cerebrovascular Diseases, 23 (2007) 256–259.
D. H. Rakison, J. B. Cicchino, Is an infant a people person?, Cognition, 94 (2004).
V. A. Kuhlmeier, P. Bloom, K. Wynn, Do 5-month-old infants see humans as material objects?, Cognition, 94 (2004) 95–103.
G. Natoli, Little things that count in transcriptional regulation, Cell, 118 (2004) 406–408.
M. L. Mbow, R. T. Sarisky, What is disrupting IFN-α’s antiviral activity?, Trends in Biotechnology, 22 (2004) 395–399.
S. G. Fischer, W. D. Macrosson, C. A. WALKER, FIRO-B, the power of love and the love of power, Psychological Reports, 76 (1995) 195–206.
N. Rosen, Q. B. She, AKT and cancer — is it all mTOR?, Cancer Cell, 10 (2006) 254–256.
D. L. Simmons, What makes a good anti-inflammatory drug target?, Drug Discovery Today, 11 (2006) 210–219.
M. Haggan, Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: dimensions of attractions, Journal of pragmatics, 36 (2004) 293–317.
J. Hartley, Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals?, Learned Publishing, 10 (1997) 313–317.
P. H. Weiss, J. C. Marshall; K. Zilles, G. R. Fink, Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors?, Neurolmage, 18 (2003) 837–846.
S. Harnad, Don’t take any virtual planes! Reply to powers on hornad on symbolism-connectionism, Psycoloquy, 12 (2001) Article 24.
M. A. J. Kompier, The “Hawthorne effect” is a myth, but what keeps the story going?, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32 (2006) 402–412.
C. I. Vardavas, A. Kafatos, Greece’s tobacco policy: another myth?, Lancet, 367 (2006) 1485–1486.
G. Laudel, Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?, Scientometrics, 57 (2003) 215–237.
C. Zimmermann, G. L. Bisanz, J. Bisanz, J. S. Klein, P. Klein, Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts’ advice to readers, and what students want to know,, Public Understanding of Science, 10 (2001) 37–58.
S. Harnad, Can a machine be conscious? How? www.cogprints.org/5330, (2003).
H. B. Uylings, L. I. Malofeeva, I. N. Bogolepova, A. M. Jacobsen, K. Amunts, K. Zilles, No postnatal doubling of number of neurons in human Broca’s areas? A stereological study, Neuroscience, 136 (2005) 715–728.
About this article
Cite this article
Ball, R. Scholarly communication in transition: The use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966–2005. Scientometrics 79, 667–679 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1984-5
- Life Science
- Scientific Article
- Question Mark
- Scholarly Communication
- Social Science Journal