Scientometrics

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 667–679

Scholarly communication in transition: The use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966–2005

Article

Abstract

The titles of scientific articles have a special significance. We examined nearly 20 million scientific articles and recorded the development of articles with a question mark at the end of their titles over the last 40 years. Our study was confined to the disciplines of physics, life sciences and medicine, where we found a significant increase from 50% to more than 200% in the number of articles with question-mark titles. We looked at the principle functions and structure of the titles of scientific papers, and we assume that marketing aspects are one of the decisive factors behind the growing usage of question-mark titles in scientific articles.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Lewison, J. Hartley, What’s in a title: Numbers of words and the presence of colons, Scientometrics, 63 (2005) 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Adams-Phillips, C. Barry, J. Giovannoni, Signal trasduction systems regulatin fruit ripening, Trends Plant Science, 9 (2004) 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Ross, Huntington’s disease new paths to pathogenesis, Cell, 118 (2004) 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Tyrrell, R. E. Zeebe, History of carbonate ion concentration over the last 100 million years, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68 (2004) 3521–3530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Krapivinsky, I. Medina, L. Krapivinsky, S. Gapon, D. Clapham, SynGAP-MUPP1-CaMKII synaptic complexes regulate p38 MAP kinase activity and NMDA receptor- dependent synaptic AMPA receptor potentiation, Neuron, 43 (2004) 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    All examples taken from: Top 25 Hottest Articles, http://top25.sciencedirect.com/index.php?cat_id=6&subject_area_id=2
  7. 7.
    W. Schneider, D. Esslinger, Die Überschrift, List Verlag, München, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.A. Mabe, M. Amin, Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde: Author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. In: ASLIB Proceedings, 54 (3). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2002 pp.149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Simon, Der Teaser — eine multifunktionale Textsorte, Dissertation (2004) 129. 134–139.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Myers, The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10 (1989) 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Yitzhaki, Relations of title length of journal articles to number of authors, Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. A. Perry, The Dillion hypothesis of titular colonicity: En empirical test from the ecological science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (1985) 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Townsend, Tutular colonicity and scholarship — New-Zealand research and scholarly impact, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 12 (1983) 41–43.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. T. Dillon, The emergence of the colon: An empirical correlate of scholarship, American Psychologist, 36 (1981) 879–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Hartley, Planning that title: Practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic articles, Library & Information Science Research, 29 (2007) 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. Soler, Writing titles in science: An exploratory study, English for Specific Purposes, 26 (2007) 90. 100–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Alexandrov, M. Hennerici, Writing good abstracts, Cerebrovascular Diseases, 23 (2007) 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. H. Rakison, J. B. Cicchino, Is an infant a people person?, Cognition, 94 (2004).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. A. Kuhlmeier, P. Bloom, K. Wynn, Do 5-month-old infants see humans as material objects?, Cognition, 94 (2004) 95–103.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Natoli, Little things that count in transcriptional regulation, Cell, 118 (2004) 406–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. L. Mbow, R. T. Sarisky, What is disrupting IFN-α’s antiviral activity?, Trends in Biotechnology, 22 (2004) 395–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. G. Fischer, W. D. Macrosson, C. A. WALKER, FIRO-B, the power of love and the love of power, Psychological Reports, 76 (1995) 195–206.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Rosen, Q. B. She, AKT and cancer — is it all mTOR?, Cancer Cell, 10 (2006) 254–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. L. Simmons, What makes a good anti-inflammatory drug target?, Drug Discovery Today, 11 (2006) 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Haggan, Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: dimensions of attractions, Journal of pragmatics, 36 (2004) 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Hartley, Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals?, Learned Publishing, 10 (1997) 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. H. Weiss, J. C. Marshall; K. Zilles, G. R. Fink, Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors?, Neurolmage, 18 (2003) 837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Harnad, Don’t take any virtual planes! Reply to powers on hornad on symbolism-connectionism, Psycoloquy, 12 (2001) Article 24.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. A. J. Kompier, The “Hawthorne effect” is a myth, but what keeps the story going?, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32 (2006) 402–412.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. I. Vardavas, A. Kafatos, Greece’s tobacco policy: another myth?, Lancet, 367 (2006) 1485–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. Laudel, Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?, Scientometrics, 57 (2003) 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Zimmermann, G. L. Bisanz, J. Bisanz, J. S. Klein, P. Klein, Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts’ advice to readers, and what students want to know,, Public Understanding of Science, 10 (2001) 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Harnad, Can a machine be conscious? How? www.cogprints.org/5330, (2003).
  34. 34.
    H. B. Uylings, L. I. Malofeeva, I. N. Bogolepova, A. M. Jacobsen, K. Amunts, K. Zilles, No postnatal doubling of number of neurons in human Broca’s areas? A stereological study, Neuroscience, 136 (2005) 715–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Library of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations