Skip to main content
Log in

A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Condensing the work of any academic scientist into a one-dimensional indicator of scientific performance is a difficult problem. Here, we employ Bayesian statistics to analyze several different indicators of scientific performance. Specifically, we determine each indicator’s ability to discriminate between scientific authors. Using scaling arguments, we demonstrate that the best of these indicators require approximately 50 papers to draw conclusions regarding long term scientific performance with usefully small statistical uncertainties. Further, the approach described here permits statistical comparison of scientists working in distinct areas of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam, D., Nature 415, 726 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dellavalle, R. P., Hester, E. J., Heilig, L. F., Drake, A. L., Kuntzman, J.W., Graber, M., Schilling, L. M., Science 302, 787 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franck, G., Science 286, 53 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams, J., Griliches, Z., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 12664 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., Lautrup, B. E., Nature 444, 1003 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. XXXvan Raan, A. F. J., Journal of the American Society for Information Science 57, 408 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirsch, J. E., Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences 102, 16569 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garfield, E., Essays of an Information Scientist, volume 1–15. ISI Press, (1977–1993).

  9. XXXde Solla Price, D., Science 149, 510 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Redner, S., European Physics Journal B 4, 131 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, S., Lautrup, B. E., Jackson, A. D., Physical Review E 68, 026113 (2003).

  12. Redner, S., Physics Today 58, 49 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R., Science 286, 509 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Albert, R., Barabási, A.-L., Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 47 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F., Advances in Physics 51, 1079 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, M. E. J., SIAM Review 45, 167 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehmann, S., Master’s Thesis, The Niels Bohr Institute, (2003). Available online at: http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/_slj/main.pdf.

  18. Kryssanov, V. V., Kuleshov, E. L., Rinaldo, F. J., Ogawaa, H., cs/0703115 (2007).

  19. Simkin, M. V., Roychowdhury, V. P., Complex Systems 14, 269 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Newman, M. E. J., Contemporary Physics 46, 323 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seglen, P. O., Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45, 1 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., Lautrup, B. E., Europhysics Letters 69, 298 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lotka, A., Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16, 317 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sune Lehmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, S., Jackson, A.D. & Lautrup, B.E. A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. Scientometrics 76, 369–390 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1868-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1868-8

Keywords

Navigation