Skip to main content

Transient and continuant authors in a research field: The case of terrorism

Abstract

The issue of research continuance in a scientific discipline was analyzed and applied to the field of terrorism. The growing amount of literature in this field is produced mostly by one-timers who “visit” the field, contribute one or two articles, and then move to another subject area. This research pattern does not contribute to the regularity and constancy of publication by which a scientific discipline is formed and theories and paradigms of the field are created.

This study observed the research continuance and transience of scientific publications in terrorism by using obtainable “most prolific terrorism authors” lists at different points in time. These lists designed by several terrorism researchers, presented a few researchers who contributed to the field continuously and many others whose main research interest lay in another discipline. The four lists observed included authors who were continuants, transients, new-comers, and terminators (who left the field).

The lack of continuous, full-time research in a research field is typical of many disciplines, but the influence of this research pattern on a field’s growth and stability is different for older, established disciplines than for new and formative fields of study. With in the former, intellectual mobility could contribute to the rise of new topics and probably enrich the particular scientific field; with the latter, by contrast, it could hamper the formation and growth of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2001), Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of the neuroscience journals, Scientometrics, 51(3) 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diodato, V. (1994), Dictionary of Bibliometrics, New York: The Haworth Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garfield, E. (1980), The epistemology of knowledge and the spread of scientific information, Essays of an Information Scientist, 4: 586–591.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garvey, W. D. (1979), Communication: The Essence of Science, New York, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon, A. (2004), The Status of Terrorism in the Academy: Comparative Aspects and the Role of Periodicals, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Haifa.

  6. Hawkins, D. T. (1978), The literature on noble gas compounds, Journal of Chemical Information and Computation Science, 18: 190–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meadows, A. J. (1998), Communicating Research, San Diego, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mullins, N. (1973), The development of specialties in the Social Sciences, Science Studies 3: 245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Price, D. S. D., Gursey, S. (1976), Studies in scientometrics, Part I: Transience and continuance in scientific authorship, International Forum for Information and Documentation, 1(2): 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reid, E., Hsinchun, C. (2005), Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain, researchers, publications and institutions, analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3495: 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmid, A., Jongman, A. J. (1988), Political Terrorism, A New Guide For Actors, Authors, Concepts, Databases, Theories and Literature, SWIDOC, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Science Citation Index (SCI (2006), Philadelphia: ISI.

  13. Silke, A. (2004), The devil you know: Continuing problems with research on terrorism, In: A. Silke (Ed.), Research on Terrorism, Trends, Achievements and Failures, London: Frank Cass, pp. 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Silke, A. (2004), The road less travelled: Recent trends in terrorism research, In: A. Silke (Ed.), Research on Terrorism, Trends, Achievements and Failures, London: Frank Cass, pp. 186–213.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner, C. S., Leydesdorff, L. (2005), Network structure, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science, Research Policy, 34(10): 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avishag Gordon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, A. Transient and continuant authors in a research field: The case of terrorism. Scientometrics 72, 213–224 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1714-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Science Citation Index
  • Continuance Index
  • Terrorism Journal
  • Research Pattern
  • Science Citation Index Database