Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 33–57 | Cite as

Innovation assessment in traditional industries. A proposal of aesthetic innovation indicators

  • Jorge Alcaide-MarzalEmail author
  • Enrique Tortajada-Esparza
Article

Abstract

Innovative activities are fundamental to the competitiveness strategies of the firms in a globalized market. Their assessment, using indicators such as those utilized in the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), shows significant sectoral dispersion. Traditional industries are in a weak position because the innovation they are involved in is mainly aesthetic, which is not really addressed in innovation surveys. In this work, we review the various criticisms levelled at existing indicators and propose some new indicators that would capture the types of innovations that are conducted by the traditional industries. This work is based on a study of the features of traditional industries and the concept of aesthetic novelty. The proposed indicators are tested in the Spanish footwear industry.

Keywords

OECD Innovation Process Industrial District Innovative Firm Innovation Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., Varga, A. (2002), Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy, 31(7): 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcaide, J. (2004), Análisis de las Interrelaciones entre los Procesos de Diseño de Producto e Innovación y la Estructura Industrial en el Sector del Calzado de la Comunidad Valenciana, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
  3. Arundel, A., Smith, K., Patel, P., Sirilli, G. (1998), The Future of Innovation Measurement in Europe. Concepts, Problems and Practical Directions, IDEA Paper Series Report 3.Google Scholar
  4. Becattini, G. (1990), The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion, In: F. Pyke, G. Becattini, W. Senegenberger (Eds), Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
  5. Bertarelli, S., Censolo, R. (2000), Preference for Novelty and Price Behaviour, Working Papers 383, Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Economia.Google Scholar
  6. Bianchi, G., Bortolotti, F. (1996), On the Concept of Formal Innovation, European Regional Science Association 36th European Congress, Zurich.Google Scholar
  7. Bianchi, M. (2002), Novelty, preferences, and fashion: when goods are unsettling, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 47: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buesa, M., Molero, J. (1996), Innovación y Diseño Industrial, Evaluación de la Política de Promoción del Diseño en España, Colección Economía, Ed. Civitas. ISBN 84-470-0648-4. Madrid.Google Scholar
  9. Calvo, J. (2000), Una caracterización de la innovación tecnológica en los sectores manufactureros españoles: algunos datos, Economía Industrial, 331: 139–150.Google Scholar
  10. Caulkins, J. P., Hartl, R. F., Kort, P. M., Feichtinger, G. (2003), Explaining Fashion Cycles: Chasing Innovators by Imitators, Workshop on Economic Dynamics, Free University of Bozen/Bolzano.Google Scholar
  11. Chayutsahakij, P., Poggenpohl, S. (2002), User-Centered Innovation: The Interplay between User-Research and Design Innovation, Proceedings of The European Academy of Management 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management, EURAM, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, R. S., Merrill, S. A. (Eds) (1997), Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Corneo, G., Jeanne, O. (1994), A Theory of Fashion Based on Segmented Communication, Discussion Paper No A-462, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
  14. COTEC (1998), El Sistema Español de Innovación, Diagnósticos y recomendaciones. Libro Blanco, Fundación COTEC para la Innovación Tecnológica, ISBN: 84-922720-4-X.Google Scholar
  15. Dalmau, J. I., Hervás, J. L. (2002), Análisis Cuantitativo del “Efecto Distrito”. Evidencia Empírica para la Industria Azulejera Española, XII Congreso Nacional de ACEDE, Palma de Mallorca.Google Scholar
  16. DTI (2001), UK Innovation Survey, Office for National Statistics, Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  17. Dodgson, M. (2001), Measuring Innovation, International Conference on “Measuring and Evaluating Industrial R&D and Innovation in the Knowledge-based Economy”, Taipei.Google Scholar
  18. EUP (2001), Enforcing Small Firms’ Patent Rights 2001, European Union Publisher, ISBN 92-894-0633-X.Google Scholar
  19. EUROSTAT (2001), Third Community Innovation Survey, Harmonised Questionnaire.Google Scholar
  20. FICE (2004), Federación de Empresas del Calzado Español, Anuario del Calzado 2004. FICE.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, C. (1982), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Godin, B. (2002), The Rise of Innovation Surveys: Measuring a Fuzzy Concept, Observatoire des sciences et des technologies. Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics Working Paper No. 16.Google Scholar
  23. González, A. (1998), El diseño industrial, factor clave en la gestión e innovación empresariales. La política del MINER, Revista de Economía Industrial, 324 (VI. Diseño Industrial y Desarrollo de Producto): 13–20.Google Scholar
  24. Griliches, Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  25. Gupta, S. K., Samuel, A. K. (2001), Integrating Market Research with the Product Development Process: A Step towards Design for Profit, Proceedings of DETC 2001: ASME Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  26. Hart, D. (2000), Innovation Clusters: Key Concepts, Working Papers in Land Management and Development 06/00. University of Reading.Google Scholar
  27. Heskett, J. (1997), Design for profit, In: D. Steenstra (Ed.), Design for Profit Report: Proceeding Report of the Design for Profit Seminar, University of Warwick Print Service, pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
  28. INE (2002), Encuesta sobre innovación tecnológica en las empresas (2000), Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid.Google Scholar
  29. ITI (2001), South African Innovation Survey 2001 for Manufacturing and Services, University of Pretoria and Eindhoven Centre for Innovation.Google Scholar
  30. Iversen, E. J. (1998), Understanding innovation indicators based on patents, In: Smith, K. (Ed), Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: a Guide for Policy Makers, IDEA Paper Series no 5, STEP, Oslo.Google Scholar
  31. Kimbell, R. (2002), Assessing Design Innovation, Assessing Design Innovation, Working Paper, Technology Education Research Unit, Goldsmiths University of London.Google Scholar
  32. Kline, S. J., Rosenberg, N. (1986), An overview of innovation, In: Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds), The Positive Sum Strategy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275–305.Google Scholar
  33. Krippendorff, K., Butter, R. (1984), Product semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form, The Journal of the Industrial Designers Society of America, 4–9.Google Scholar
  34. Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, Macmillan, Londres.Google Scholar
  35. MCT (2001), Terceiro Inquérito Comunitário à Inovação. (CIS III), Questionário relativo ao processo de Inovação na empresa referente a 1998–2000, Ministério da Ciência e da Tecnologia, Portugal.Google Scholar
  36. Mohnen, P., Therrien, P. (2001), How Innovative Are Canadian Firms Compared to Some European Firms? A Comparative Look at Innovation Surveys, CIRANO Working Paper 2001s-49.Google Scholar
  37. Mutlu, B., Er, A. (2003), Design Innovation: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on Product Innovation by Design, Proceedings of the 5th European Academy of Design Conference, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  38. OECD (1994), Proposed Standard Practice for Survey of Research and Development, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators, (Patent Manual), OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  39. OECD (1997), The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), DSTI, 2nd Edition, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  40. OECD (2002), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, OECD.Google Scholar
  41. OECD (2005), The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), DSTI, 3rd Edition, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  42. Osgood, C. E., Suci, C. J., Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  43. Ottum, B. D., Moore, W. L. (1997), The role of market information in new product success/failure, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14: 258–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13: 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pesendorfer, W. (1995), Design innovation and fashion cycles, American Economic Review, 85(4): 771–792.Google Scholar
  46. Piller, F., Koch, M., Möslein, K., Schubert, P. (2003), Managing High Variety: How to Overcome the Mass Confusion Phenomenon of Customer Co-Design, Proceedings of the EURAM 2003 Conference, Milan.Google Scholar
  47. Pugh, S. (1996), Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design: The Living Legacy of Stuart Pugh, Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.Google Scholar
  48. Rae, J. (1834), The Sociological Theory of Capital, New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  49. Rogers, M. (1998), The Definition and Measurement of Innovation, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 10/98. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  50. Rothwell, R. (1992), Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s’, R&D Management, 22(3): 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rothwell, R. (1994), Industrial innovation: Success, strategy, trends, In: Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (Eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham, Elgar Publishing Limited, Vermont, pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
  52. Sancho, R. (2001), Directrices de la OECD para la Obtención de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología, V Taller Iberoamericano e Interamericano de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología.Google Scholar
  53. Sandven, T., Smith, K. (1998), Understanding R&D Intensity Indicators. Effects of Differences in Industrial Structure and Country Size, IDEA Report 14.Google Scholar
  54. Sanz, L., Arias, E. (1998), Especialización y capacidades tecnológicas de las regiones españolas: un análisis a través de las patentes europeas, Economía Industrial, 324(6): 105–122.Google Scholar
  55. Schmookler, J. (1966), Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  56. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  57. Schweizer, T. S. (2002), Managing Interactions between Technological and Stylistic Innovation in the Media Industries, ERIM Report Series Research in Management. ERS-2002-16-ORG.Google Scholar
  58. Sirilli, G. (1998), Conceptualizing and Measuring Technological Innovation, IDEA Paper Series 1, STEP Group, Oslo.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, K. (1998), Innovation indicators, In: Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: a Guide for Policy Makers, IDEA Paper Series 5, STEP Group, Oslo.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, K. (2001), Measurement of Innovation in Europe: Concepts, Experience and Results, Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics. Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies Working Paper No. 17.Google Scholar
  61. Statistics Canada (1999), Survey of Innovation 1999, Science, Innovation and Electronic Information Division.Google Scholar
  62. STEP (2000), The Analysis of CIS II Data: Towards an Identification of Regional Innovation Systems, STEP Economics, Turin.Google Scholar
  63. Tether, B. (2001), Identifying Innovation, Innovators and Innovative Behaviours: A Critical Assessment of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), CRIC Discussion Paper No 48.Google Scholar
  64. Tomlinson, M. (2000), Innovation Surveys: A Researcher’s Perspective, DRUID Working Paper No 00-9.Google Scholar
  65. Tortajada, E., Fernández, I., Ybarra, J. A. (2005), Evolución de la industria española del calzado. Factores relevantes en las últimas décadas, Economía Industrial, 355–356: 211–227.Google Scholar
  66. Valdecantos, M. (1998), Contexto y expectativas del diseño en el proceso de innovación, Revista de Economía Industrial, 324(VI): 27–36.Google Scholar
  67. Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  68. Walsh, V., Roy, R., Bruce, M. (1988), Competitive by design, Journal of Marketing Management, 4(2): 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wylant, B. (2002), Industrial Design and Innovation Theory, A Basis for Describing the Experience of Innovation, Industrial Designers Society of America (ISDA) National Education Conference, 2002.Google Scholar
  70. Ybarra, J. A., Giner, J. M., Santa María, M. J. (2002), El calzado en España: del sector al territorio. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante. Alicante.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Alcaide-Marzal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Enrique Tortajada-Esparza
    • 2
  1. 1.Project Engineering DepartmentUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.INGENIO (CSIC-UPV)ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations