Abstract
Nanoscience and technology (NST) is a young scientific and technological field that has generated great worldwide interest in the past two decades. Previous bibliometric analyses have unmistakably demonstrated the remarkable growth of the global NST literature. While almost all published research articles in NST are in English, increasingly a larger share of NST publications is published in the Chinese language. Perplexingly, Chinese is the only language — apart from English — that displays an ascendant trend in the NST literature. In this brief note, we explore and evaluate three arguments that could explain this phenomenon: coverage bias, language preference, and community formation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai, C. (2005), Ascent of nanoscience in China, Science, 309: 61–63.
Braun, T., Schubert, A., Zsindely, S. (1997), Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance, Scientometrics, 38: 321–325.
Garfield, E. (1989), The English language: the lingua franca of international science, The Scientist, 3(10): 12.
Glänzel, W., Meyer, M., Du Plessis, M., Thijs, B., Magerman, T., Schlemmer, B., Debackere, K., Veugelers, R. (2003), Nanotechnology: Analysis of an Emerging Domain of Scientific and Technological Endeavour, Steunpunt O & O Statistieken. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Hassan, M. (2005), Small things and big changes in the developing world, Science, 309: 65–66.
Hullmann, A., Meyer, M. (2003), Publications and patents in nanotechnology: an overview of previous studies and the state of the art, Scientometrics, 58: 507–527.
Jin, B., Rousseau, R. (2004), Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China. In: H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 497–514.
Meyer, M. (2001), Patent citations analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nano-technology, Scientometrics, 51: 163–183.
Moed, H. F. (2002), Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 53: 281–296.
Ren, S., Rousseau, R. (2002), International visibility of Chinese scientific journals, Scientometrics, 53: 389–405.
Ren, S., Liang, P., Zu, G. (1999), The challenge for Chinese scientific journals, Science, 286: 1683.
Rey-Rocha, J., Martin-Sempere, M. J. (1999), The role of domestic journals in geographically-oriented disciplines: the case of Spanish journals in Earth Sciences, Scientometrics, 45: 203–216.
Salamanca-Buentello, F., Persad, D., Court, E., Martin, D., Daar, A., Singer, P. (2005), Nanotechnology and the developing world, PLoS Medicine, 2: 383–386.
Van Leeuwen, Th. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., Van Raan, A. F. J. (2001), Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance, Scientometrics, 51: 335–346.
Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2006), The emergence of China as a leading nation in science, Research Policy, 35: 83–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, MW., Zhang, J. Language trends in nanoscience and technology: The case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics 70, 555–564 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0302-6
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0302-6