What Is Light?
Quantum physics describes light as having both particle and wave properties; however, there is no consensus about how to interpret this duality on an ontological level. This article explores how pre-university physics students, while working with learning material focusing on historical-philosophical aspects of quantum physics, interpreted the wave-particle duality of light and which views they expressed on the nature of physics. A thematic analysis was performed on 133 written responses about the nature of light, given in the beginning of the teaching sequence, and 55 audio-recorded small-group discussions addressing the wave-particle duality, given later in the sequence. Most students initially expressed a wave and particle view of light, but some of these gave an “uncritical duality description”, accepting without question the two ontologically different descriptions of light. In the small-group discussions, students expressed more nuanced views. Many tried to reconcile the two descriptions using semi-classical reasoning; others entered into philosophical discussions about the status of the current scientific description of light and expected science to come up with a better model. Some found the wave description of light particularly challenging and lacked a conception of “what is waving”. Many seemed to implicitly take a realist view on the description of physical phenomena, contrary with the Copenhagen interpretation which is prevalent in textbooks. Results are discussed in light of different interpretations of quantum physics, and we conclude by arguing for a historical-philosophical perspective as an entry point for upper secondary physics students to explore the development and interpretation of quantum physical concepts.
KeywordsWave-particle duality Interpretation of quantum physics Nature of physics Upper secondary physics Nature of light
The authors would like to thank participating students and teachers and the ReleQuant project group for their contributions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
- Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1989). Dualité onde-particule pour un photon unique. Journal of Optics, 20(3), 119-129.Google Scholar
- Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2014). Ontological flexibility and the learning of quantum mechanics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.8499.Google Scholar
- Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., & Angell, C. (2018). Actual vs. implied physics students: how students from traditional physics classrooms related to an innovative approach to quantum physics. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21339.
- Bohr, N. (1961). Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bungum, B., Bøe, M. V., & Henriksen, E. K. (2018). How small-group discussions may enhance students’ understanding in quantum physics. Unpublished manuscript. NTNU. Trondheim.Google Scholar
- Einstein, A. (1989). The collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 2. In J. Stachel (Ed.), The Swiss years: writings, 1900–1909. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gjerland, M. (2015). Elevers oppfatning om lys og bølge/partikkel-dualismen (students’ understanding of light/wave dualism). Master’s thesis, NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
- Greca, I. M., & Freire Jr., O. (2014a). Meeting the challenge: quantum physics in introductory physics courses. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 183–209). Springer.Google Scholar
- Kragh, H., & Pedersen, S. A. (1992). Naturvidenskabens teori (the philosophy of science). Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
- NDET (2006). Physics—programme subject in programmes for specialization in general studies. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/kl06/FYS1-01?lplang=http://data.udir.no/kl06/eng
- Newton, I. (1952). Opticks, or, a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections and colours of light. Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
- NGSS. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Planck, M. (1900). On the theory of the energy distribution law of the normal spectrum. In H. Kangro (Ed.), Planck’ original papers in quantum physics (pp. 38–45). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Renstrøm, R. (2011). Kvantefysikkens utvikling—i fysikklærebøker, vitenkapshistorien og undervisning [The development of quantum physics—in physics textbooks, in the history of science, and in the classroom]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. In: M. Cole (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar