American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAA) - Project 2061 (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Battaly, H. (2006). Teaching intellectual virtues: applying virtue epistemology in the classroom. Teaching Philosophy, 29(3), 191–222.
Bergman, G., Borda, C. S., Ergazaki, M., Harlen, W., Kotul’áková, K., Pascucci, A., Schoultz, J., Transetti, C., & Zoldozova, K. (2012). Tools for enhancing inquiry in Science Education. http://fibonacci.uni-bayreuth.de/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/Dokumente/startingpackage/companion/tools_for_enhancing_inquiry_in_science_education.pdf&t=1501243995&hash=fb4ee996b138d0c7958246d0e8220901. Accessed 25 July 2017.
Bridges, D., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (2007). Philosophy, methodology and educational research. New Jersey: Willey-Blackwell.
Bruguière, C., Tiberghien, A., & Clément, P. (Eds.). (2014). Topics and trends in current science education (pp. 37–54). New York: Springer.
Brush, S. G. (1989). History of science and science education. Interchange, 20(2), 60–70.
Burgh, G., & Nichols, K. (2012). The parallels between philosophical inquiry and scientific inquiry: implications for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(10), 1045–1059.
Bybee, R. W., & Ben-Zvi, N. (1998). Science curriculum: transforming goals to practices. In K. G. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 2, pp. 487–498). Norwell: Kluwer Academic.
Carter, J. A. (2016). Robust virtue epistemology as anti-luck epistemology: a new solution. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97(1), 140–155.
Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5), 803–819.
Conant, J. B. (1951). Science and common sense. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Crick, F. (1996). Visual perception: rivalry and consciousness. Nature, 379(6565), 485–486.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: emotion, rationality and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.
Davson-Galle, P. (1994). Philosophy of science and school science. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 26(1), 34–53.
Davson-Galle, P. (2004). Philosophy of science, critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, 13(6), 503–517.
De Ridder, J. (2014). Science and scientism in popular science writing. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 3(12), 23–39.
De Waal, F. (2009). Primates and philosophers: how morality evolved. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Duschl, R. A. (2008). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. In Erduran & Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 159–175). New York: Springer.
Eflin, J. T., Glennan, S., & Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: a perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 107–116.
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ergazaki, M., & Zogza, V. (2005). From a causal question to stating and testing hypotheses: exploring the discursive activity of biology students. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. Jong, & O. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 407–417). New York: Springer.
Ergazaki, M., & Zogza, V. (2013). How does the model of Inquiry-Based Science Education work in the kindergarten: the case of biology. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 7(2), 73–97.
Fara, P. (2015). That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos. In R. L. Numbers & K. Kampourakis (Eds.), Newton’s apple and other myths about science (pp. 48–56). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Forge, J. C. (1979). A role for philosophy of science in the teaching of science. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 13(1), 109–117.
Gasparatou, R. (2008). Species of philosophical naturalism, science and scienticism. The International Journal of Humanities, 6(4), 27–35.
Gasparatou, R. (2016). Emotional speech acts and the educational perlocutions of speech. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(3), 319–331.
Gasparatou, R. (2017a). On “the temptation to attack common sense”. In M. A. Peters & J. Stickney (Eds.), A companion to Wittgenstein on education: pedagogical investigations (pp. 275–286). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gasparatou, R. (2017b). Philosophy for/with children (P4C) & the development of epistemically virtuous agents. In M. Gregory, J. Haynes, & K. Murris (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of philosophy for children (pp. 103–111). London: Routledge.
Haack, S. (2007). Defending science within reason: between scientism and cynicism. New York: Prometheus Books.
Harris, S. (2011). The moral landscape: how science can determine human values. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Huber, R. A., & Moore, C. J. (2001). A model for extending hands-on science to be inquiry based. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 32–42.
Hughes, A. L. (2012). The folly of scientism. The New Atlantis, 37, 32–50.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories?: a classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 51–61.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171–1190.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Designing argumentation learning environments. In I. S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 91–115). Rotterdam: Springer.
Kampourakis, K. (2016a). (The) nature(s) of science(s) and (the) scientific method(s). Science & Education, 25(1–), 1–2.
Kampourakis, K. (2016b). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682.
Kampourakis, K., & Nehm, R. H. (2014). History and philosophy of science and the teaching of evolution: students’ conceptions and explanations. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 377–399). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kidd, I. (2014). Doing away with scientism. Philosophy Now, 102, 30–31.
Kitcher, P. (2012). Seeing is unbelieving. New York Times Book Review. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/alex-rosenbergs-the-atheists-guide-to-reality.html. Accessed 26 Jul 2017.
Kotzee, B. (Ed.). (2013). Education and the Growth of Knowledge: perspectives from social and virtue epistemology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552.
Kuhn, D., & Park, S. H. (2005). Epistemological understanding and the development of intellectual values. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 111–124.
Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 113–129.
Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2006). Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(3), 279–293.
Ladyman, J. (2011). The scientistic stance: the empirical and materialist stances reconciled. Synthese, 178(1), 87–98.
Lakatos. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. (1986). Science and values. Oakland: University of California Press.
Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub.
Lederman, N. (2006). Research on nature of science: reflections on the past, anticipations of the future. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1–11.
Lederman, & Abell, S. K. (2014). Handbook of research on science education. New York: Routledge.
Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 600–620). New York: Routledge.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Liang, L. L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. (2009). Preservice teachers’ views about nature of scientific knowledge development: an international collaborative study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 987–1012.
Longbottom, J. E., & Butler, P. H. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education. Science Education, 83(4), 473–492.
Longino, H.E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Matthews, M. R. (1988). A role for history and philosophy in science teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(2), 67–81.
Matthews, M. R. (1990). History, philosophy and science teaching: a rapprochement. Studies in Science Education, 18, 25–51.
Matthews, M. R. (2004). Reappraising positivism and education: the arguments of Philipp Frank and Herbert Feigl. Science & Education, 13(1), 7–39.
Matthews, M. R. (2017). In praise of philosophically-engaged history of science. Science & Education, 26, 175–184.
McCain, K. (2016). The nature of scientific knowledge: an explanatory approach. New York: Springer.
McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263.
McComas, W. F., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Using the history of biology, chemistry, geology, and physics to illustrate general aspects of nature of science. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT education, 9(1), 47–76.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474–496.
Mizrahi, M. (2017). What’s so bad about Scientism? Social Epistemology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1297505.
Neurath, O. (1921). Anti-spengler. Munich: Callwey Verlang.
Nola, R., & Irzik, G. (2006). Philosophy, science, education and culture (Vol. 28). New York: Springer.
Numbers, R. L., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Newton’s apple and other myths about science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Olby, R. C. (1974). The path to the double helix: the discovery of DNA. North Chelmsford: Courier Corporation.
Östman, L., & Almqvist, J. (2010). 11 What do values and norms have to do with scientific literacy? In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P. Wickman, G. Ericksen, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 160–175). New York: Routledge.
Östman, L., & Wickman, P. O. (2014). A pragmatic approach on epistemology, teaching, and learning. Science Education, 98(3), 375–382.
Peels, R. (2015). Het fundamentele argument tegen sciëntisme. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 107(3), 267–284.
Peels, R. (2017). Ten reasons to embrace scientism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1(63), 11–21.
Pigliucci, M. (2013). New Atheism and the scientistic turn in the atheism movement. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 37(1), 142–153.
Pinker, S. (2013). Science is not your enemy: An impassioned plea to neglected novelists, embattled professors, and tenure-less historians. New Republic, 6. https://newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities. Accessed 30 Jul 2017.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). In R. M. Ohmann (Ed.), The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Quine, W. V. O., Churchland, P. S., & Føllesdal, D. (2013). Word and object. MIT Press.
Reiss, M. (2007). What should be the aim (s) of school science education. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. F. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 13–28). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Rosenberg, A. (2011). The atheist’s guide to reality: enjoying life without illusions. New York: W.W. Norton.
Ross, D., Ladyman, J., & Spurrett, D. (2007). In defence of scientism. In J. Ladyman, D. Ross, D. Spurrett, & J. Collier (Eds.), Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized (pp. 1–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rowbottom, D. P., & Aiston, S. J. (2006). The myth of ‘scientific method’ in contemporary educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 137–156.
Simonneaux, L. (2002). Analysis of classroom debating strategies in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 9–12.
Simonneaux, L. (2008). Argumentation in science education: an overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 179–199). Netherlands: Springer.
Simonneaux, L. (2014). Questions socialement vives and socio-scientific issues: new trends of research to meet the training needs of postmodern society. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education (pp. 37–54). Netherlands: Springer.
Smith, R. (2008). Proteus rising: re-imagining educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(1), 183–198.
Smith, R. (2016). The virtues of unknowing. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(2), 272–284.
Solbes, J., & Traver, M. (2003). Against a negative image of science: history of science and the teaching of physics and chemistry. Science & Education, 12(7), 703–717.
Solomon, R. C. (1988). On emotions as judgments. American Philosophical Quarterly, 25(2), 183–191.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421.
Sorell, T. (2013). Scientism: Philosophy and the infatuation with science. London: Routledge.
Standish, P. (2012). Transparency, accountability, and the public role of higher education. Educational Futures, 5(1), 3–14.
Stanford, P. K. (2016) Naturalism without Scientism. In K.J. Clark (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism (pp. 91–108). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Stenmark, M. (2001). Scientism: science, ethics and religion. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Stickney, J. (2009). Wittgenstein’s contextualist approach to judging “sound” teaching: escaping enthrallment in criteria-based assessments. Educational Theory, 59(2), 197–216.
Thurs, D. (2015). That the scientific method accurately reflects what scientists actually do. In R. L. Numbers & K. Kampourakis (Eds.), Newton’s apple and other myths about science (pp. 210–219). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Van Woudenberg, R. (2011). Truths that science cannot touch. Philosophia Reformata, 76(2), 169–186.
Wandersee, J. H. (1992). The historicality of cognition: implications for science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 423–434.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wootton, D. (2015). The invention of science: a new history of the scientific revolution. London: Penguin Random House.
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.