Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 25, Issue 9–10, pp 1073–1088 | Cite as

Dramatizing the Authentic Research of a Local Scientist to Urban Elementary Students Through Professional Theater

  • Stephen R. BurginEmail author
  • Jenifer Alonzo
  • Victoria J. Hill
Article

Abstract

This article focuses on the impact of a professional play that we developed in order to introduce elementary learners of an urban school to the research of a scientist working at a local university. The play was written in a way that might increase student understandings of the nature of science, scientific inquiry, the identity of scientists, and the work that scientists do. We collected pre-and post-play questionnaire responses and drawings of scientists from third and fourth grade students who attended the play. We also interviewed five of the ten teachers whose students attended the play. Findings indicated that most of these teachers felt strongly that their students had learned about scientific inquiry, the identity of scientists, and the work that scientists do as a result of attending the play. However, less than half of the student questionnaires and drawings of scientists indicated such growth as a result of the play. That being said, numerous students were able to tell us what they learned from the play and many questionnaire responses and drawings indicated such learning. Implications for partnerships between schools and university faculty from various disciplines in order to develop potentially impactful plays that portray authentic scientific research are discussed.

Keywords

Science Education Black Woman Colored Dissolve Organic Matter Elementary Student Grade Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by a grant from the Community Leadership Partners of the Hampton Roads Community Foundation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: evidence-based practice. London: The Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2005). “How should I know what scientists do?- I am just a kid”: fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Begoray, D. L., & Stinner, A. (2005). Representing science through historical drama. Science & Education, 14(3–5), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binns, I. C., Koehler, C. M., & Bloom, M. A. (2015). Dispositions of scientists in mainstream films: the extraordinary person called a scientist. In J. Finson & J. Pederson (Eds.), Application of visual data in K-16 science classrooms (pp. 27–50). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bloom, M., Binns, I. C., & Koehler, C. (2015). Multifaceted NOS instruction: contextualizing nature of science with documentary films. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 405–428.Google Scholar
  8. Bodzin, A., & Gehringer, M. (2001). Breaking science stereotypes. Science and Children, 38(4), 36–41.Google Scholar
  9. Bohrmann, M. L., & Akerson, V. L. (2001). A teacher’s reflections on her actions to improve her female students’ self-efficacy toward science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 13(2), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers, D. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: the draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christidou, V., Bonoti, F., & Kontopoulou, A. (2016). American and Greek children’s visual images of scientists: enduring or fading stereotypes? Science & Education, 25, 497–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: 3E. Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  13. Dagher, Z. R., & Ford, D. J. (2005). How are scientists portrayed in children’s science biographies? Science & Education, 14(3–5), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorian, K. R. (2009). Science through drama: a multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2247–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farland-Smith, D., Finson, K., Boone, W. J., & Yale, M. (2014). An investigation of media influences on elementary students representations of scientists. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: what we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 214–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2006). Humanizing the teaching of physics through storytelling: the case of current electricity. Physics Education, 41, 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kempton, W. (1997). How the public views climate change: research points to better ways to address widespread misconceptions about the problem and how to solve it. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 39, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerby, H., Cantor, J., Weiland, M., Babiarz, C., & Kerby, A. (2010). Fusion science theater presents the amazing chemical circus: a new model of outreach that uses theater to engage children in learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 1024–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koehler, C. M., Bloom, M. A., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Lights, camera, action! Developing a methodology to document mainstream films’ portrayal of nature of science and scientific inquiry. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17(2).Google Scholar
  22. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Lederman, J. S., & Ko, E. K. (2004). Views of nature of science, form E. Unpublished paper. Chicago IL: Illinois Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  24. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research, 14, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 53–70). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: an introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mead, M., & Métraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science, 126(3270), 384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.) (1998). Beyond 2000: science education for the future. London: King’s College, School of Education.Google Scholar
  31. Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be starting point for inquiry in primary science. Science Education International, 21, 102–115.Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  34. Odegarrd, M. (2003). Dramatic science: a critical review of drama in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pantidos, P., Spathi, K., & Vitoratos, E. (2001). The use of drama in science education: the case of “Blegdamsvej Faust”. Science & Education, 10, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2011). Atom surprise: using theatre in primary science education. Journal Of Science Education & Technology, 20, 508–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rahm, J., & Charbonneau, P. (1997). Probing stereotypes through students’ drawings of scientists. American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 774–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rutjens, B. T., & Heine, S. J. (2016). The immoral landscape? Scientists are associated with violations of morality. PloS One, 11(4), e0152798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stinner, A. (2007). Toward a humanistic science education. Using stories, drama, and the theatre. Canadian Theatre Review, 131, 15–19.Google Scholar
  40. Walls, L. (2012). Third grade African American students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen R. Burgin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jenifer Alonzo
    • 2
  • Victoria J. Hill
    • 3
  1. 1.Curriculum and InstructionUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Communication and Theatre ArtsOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  3. 3.Ocean, Earth, and Atmospheric SciencesOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations