Science & Education

, Volume 24, Issue 7–8, pp 821–826 | Cite as

Science & Education in Educational Perspectives: Recognizing the Contributions of Michael R. Matthews

Article

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allchin, D. (2006). Why respect for history-and historical error-matters. Science & Education, 15(1), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allchin, D. (2012). The Minnesota case study collection: New historical inquiry case studies for nature of science education. Science & Education, 21, 1263–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, K., Frappier, M., Neswald, E., & Trim, H. (2013). Reading instruments: Objects, texts and museums. Science & Education, 22(5), 1167–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, H. (2011). How historical experiments can improve scientific knowledge and science education: The cases of boiling water and electrochemistry. Science & Education, 20(3–4), 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clough, M. (2011). The story behind the science: Brining science and scientists to life in post-secondary education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cobern, W. (1995). Science education as an exercise in foreign affairs. Science & Education, 4(3), 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conant, J. B. (1957). Harvard case histories in experimental science. Chicago: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Geology as an historical sciences: Its perceptions within science and the education system. Science & Education, 12(2), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolphin, G. (2009). Evolution of the theory of the earth: A contextualized approach for teaching the history of the theory of plate tectonics to ninth grade students. Science & Education, 18(3–4), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eichinger, D., Abell, S., & Dagher, Z. (1997). Developing a graduate level science education course on the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goddiksen, M. (2014). Philosophical perspectives on interdisciplinary science education: Characterizing important expertises through a practice oriented analysis of integration and explanation. Doctoral Dissertation, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  13. Greiffenhagen, C., & Sherman, W. (2008). Kuhn and conceptual change: On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children. Science & Education, 17(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heaton, T. (2009). Recent developments in young-earth creationist geology. Science & Education, 18(10), 1341–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heilbron, J. L. (2002). History in science education, with cautionary tales about the agreement of measurement and theory. Science & Education, 11(4), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irzik, G., & Irzik, S. (2002). Which multiculturalism? Science & Education, 11(4), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang, F., & McComas, W. (2014). Analysis of nature of science included in recent popular writing using text mining techniques. Science & Education, 23, 1785–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kampourakis, K. (2013). Mendel and the path to genetics: Portraying science as a social process. Science & Education, 22(2), 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klassen, S. (2009). The construction and analysis of a science story: A proposed methodology. Science & Education, 18(3–4), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Love, A. (2013). Interdisciplinary lessons for the teaching of biology from the practice of evo-devo. Science & Education, 22(2), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matthews, M. R. (1988). A role for history and philosophy in science teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(2), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthews, M. R. (1989). History, philosophy, and science teaching: A brief review. Synthese, 80(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  23. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2014). International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (Vol. 3). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Niaz, M., & Rodríguez, M. (2005). The oil drop experiment: Do physical chemistry textbooks refer to its controversial nature? Science & Education, 14(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plutynski, A. (2010). Should intelligent design be taught in public school science classrooms? Science & Education, 19(6–8), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.Google Scholar
  29. Rudge, D., & Howe, E. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach tot he use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18(5), 561–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (2008). Teaching about the epistemology of science in upper secondary school: An analysis of teachers’ classroom talk. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Siemsen, H. (2014). Ernest Mach: A genetic introduction to his educational theory and pedagogy. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 2329–2357). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Stinner, A., McMillan, B., Metz, D., Jilek, J., & Klassen, S. (2003). The renewal of case studies in science education. Science & Education, 12(7), 617–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teichmann, J. (1999). Studying Galileo at secondary school: A reconstruction of his ‘jumping-hill’ experiment and the process of discovery. Science & Education, 8(2), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.University of FlensburgFlensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations