Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 1853–1873 | Cite as

Report on a Boston University Conference December 7–8, 2012 on How Can the History and Philosophy of Science Contribute to Contemporary US Science Teaching?

  • Peter GarikEmail author
  • Yann Benétreau-Dupin
Article

Abstract

This is an editorial report on the outcomes of an international conference sponsored by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) (REESE-1205273) to the School of Education at Boston University and the Center for Philosophy and History of Science at Boston University for a conference titled: How Can the History and Philosophy of Science Contribute to Contemporary US Science Teaching? The presentations of the conference speakers and the reports of the working groups are reviewed. Multiple themes emerged for K-16 education from the perspective of the history and philosophy of science. Key ones were that: students need to understand that central to science is argumentation, criticism, and analysis; students should be educated to appreciate science as part of our culture; students should be educated to be science literate; what is meant by the nature of science as discussed in much of the science education literature must be broadened to accommodate a science literacy that includes preparation for socioscientific issues; teaching for science literacy requires the development of new assessment tools; and, it is difficult to change what science teachers do in their classrooms. The principal conclusions drawn by the editors are that: to prepare students to be citizens in a participatory democracy, science education must be embedded in a liberal arts education; science teachers alone cannot be expected to prepare students to be scientifically literate; and, to educate students for scientific literacy will require a new curriculum that is coordinated across the humanities, history/social studies, and science classrooms.

Keywords

Science Education Science Teacher Science Classroom Science Content Participatory Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Emily Allen and Thomas Hunt, Doctoral Fellows in the School of Education at Boston University, and Dr. Charles Winrich, Director of Science at Babson College, for their readings of drafts of this manuscript. For the logistics of the conference organization itself, we are greatly indebted to Thomas Hunt. It was his organizational skills that allowed us to maintain a database of all the invitees and eventual conferees. Mr. Hunt further designed and created the conference website, organized the video recording, obtained the permissions, and uploaded the conference video and PowerPoint presentations. The conference was funded by a conference grant from the United States National Science Foundation (NSF) from the Division of Research and Learning, (REESE-1205273). We are grateful to the program officers of NSF for their recommendations of conferees.

References

  1. AAAS. (1990). Science for all Americans. Project 2061 American Association for the Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Achieve. (2011). Next generation science standards. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards. Accessed on July 1, 2014.
  4. Ahlgren, A., & Walberg, H. J. (1973). Changing attitudes towards science among adolescents. Nature, 245, 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allchin, D. (2012). The Minnesota case study collection: New historical inquiry case studies for nature of science education. Science & Education, 21(9), 1263–1281.Google Scholar
  7. Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science perspectives & resources. St. Paul: SHiPS Education Press.Google Scholar
  8. Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from the classroom. This issue.Google Scholar
  9. Benétreau-Dupin, Y. (2013) How to include the history and philosophy of science (HPS) in science education standards? http://www.rotman.uwo.ca/2013/02/. Accessed July 4, 2014.
  10. Brandt, R. (2013). Broadening the goals of science education. http://www.rotman.uwo.ca/2013/02/. Accessed July 4, 2014.
  11. Clement, J. (2009). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Coelho, R. L. (2013). Could HPS improve problem-solving? Science & Education, 22(5), 1043–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conant, J. B., & Nash, L. K. (Eds.). (1957). Harvard case histories in experimental science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109–2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Educational Development Center. (2009). Exploring bioethics. NIH Curriculum Supplement Series Grades 9-12. http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/nih9/bioethics/default.htm. Accessed on July 1, 2014.
  18. Fox, C. (2013). What must be done to educate, equip, and support teachers to incorporate HPS intotheir curricula? http://www.rotman.uwo.ca/2013/02/. Accessed July 4, 2014.
  19. Garbayo, L. (2014). Epistemic considerations on expert disagreement, normative justification, and inconsistency regarding multi-criteria decision making. In Constraint programming and decision making. Studies in Computational Intelligence (vol. 539, pp. 35–45).Google Scholar
  20. Holton, G. (1967). Harvard project physics. Physics Today, 20, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holton, G. (2003). The project physics course, then and now. Science & Education, 12(8), 779–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holton, G. (2013). The neglected mandate: Teaching science as part of our culture. Science & Education. doi: 10.1007/s11191-013-9632-3.
  23. Holton, G., & Brush, S. G. (1985). Introduction to concepts and theories in physical science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hong, H., & Lin-Siegler, X. (2012). How learning about scientists’ struggles influences students’ interest and learning in physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge—An analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20(3–4), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacquart, M. (2013) Improving scientific literacy through improved critical thinking skills. http://www.rotman.uwo.ca/2013/02/. Accessed July 4, 2014.
  27. Klopfer, L. E. (1992). Historical perspective on the history and nature of science on school science programs. In Teaching about the history and nature of science and technology: Background papers (pp. 105–130). BSCS/SSEC, Colorado Springs, CO.Google Scholar
  28. Klopfer, L. E., & Cooley, W. W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists: A report on the HOSC instruction project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. National Research Council (NRC) (Ed.). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Research Council (NRC). (2007a). Ready, set, SCIENCE!: Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council (NRC). (2007b). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. National Research Council (NRC) (Ed.). (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  34. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  35. Piliouras, P., Siakas, S., & Seroglou, F. (2011). Pupils produce their own narratives inspired by the history of science: Animation movies concerning the geocentric–heliocentric debate. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 761–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rudge, D. W., Cassidy, D. P., Fulford, J. M., & Howe, E. M. (2014). Changes observed in views of nature of science during a historically based unit. This issue.Google Scholar
  37. Rutherford, F., Holton, G., & Watson, F. (1981). Project physics: Resource book. Holt, Rinehart and Winston Publishers. Project physics collection, on archive.org. http://archive.org/details/projectphysicscollection. Accessed 3 Aug 2013.
  38. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  39. Stott, R., & Morrish, H. (2009). Newton in three dimensions. Science, 326(5955), 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Teixeira, E. S., Greca, I. M., & Freire, O. (2012). The history and philosophy of science in physics teaching: A research synthesis of didactic interventions. Science & Education, 21(6), 771–796.Google Scholar
  41. Welch, W. (1973). Review of the research and evaluation program of Harvard Project Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10(4), 365–378.Google Scholar
  42. Welch, W., & Walberg, H. (1972). A national experiment in curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 373–383.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Two Silber WayBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Rotman Institute of PhilosophyWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations