Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Images of nature of science in middle grade science trade books. The New Advocate,
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education,
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education,
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A.-P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research on Science Teaching,
Alshamrani, S. M. (2008). Context, accuracy, and level of inclusion of nature of science concepts in current high school physics textbooks. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ball, P. (2006). Critical mass: How one thing leads to another. Farrar: Straus and Giroux.
Brooks, K. (2008). A content analysis of physical science textbooks with regard to the nature of science and ethnic diversity (Unpublished Doctor of Education Dissertation). University of Houston.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education,
Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Fan, R.-E., Chang, K.-W., Hsieh, C.-J., Wang, X.-R., & Lin, C.-J. (2011). LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/liblinear.
Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2006). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
43(2), 214–235. doi:10.1002/tea.20095.
Gamon, M., Aue, A., Corston-Oliver, S., & Ringger, E. (2005). Pulse: Mining customer opinions from free text. In A. F. Famili, J. N. Kok, J. M. Peña, A. Siebes, & A. Feelders (Eds.), Advances in intelligent data analysis (Vol. VI, pp. 121–132). Berlin: Springer.
Gibbs, A., & Lawson, A. E. (1992). The nature of scientific thinking as reflected by the work of biologists and by biology textbooks. American Biology Teacher,
Guisasola, J., Almudí, J. M., & Furió, C. (2005). The nature of science and its implications for physics textbooks: The case of classical magnetic field theory. Science & Education,
Hakim, J. (2007). The story of science: Einstein adds a new dimension. USA: Smithsonian Books.
Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education,
Holmes, R. (2009). The age of wonder: How the romantic generation discovered the beauty and terror of science. USA: Pantheon.
Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education,
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lee, Y. (2007). How do the high school biology textbooks introduce the nature of science? (Unpublished Doctor of Education Dissertation). University of Houston.
Lumpe, A. T., & Beck, J. (1996). A profile of high school biology textbooks using scientific literacy recommendations. The American Biology Teacher,
McComas, W. F. (2003). A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
McComas, W. F. (2005). Seeking NOS standards: What content consensus exists in popular books on the nature of science. In Presented at the annual conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.
McComas, W. F. (2007). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education,
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), the nature of science in science education (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). New York, NY: Springer.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/natureofscience.aspx.
Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education,
Niaz, M. (2000). A rational reconstruction of the kinetic molecular theory of gases based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Instructional Science,
Phillips, M. C. (2006). A content analysis of sixth-grade, seventh-grade, and eighth-grade science textbooks with regard to the nature of science (Unpublished Doctor of Education Dissertation). University of Houston.
Raja, U., Mitchell, T., Day, T., & Hardin, J. M. (2008). Text mining in healthcare: Applications and opportunities. Journal of Healthcare Information Management,
Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2004). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology,
Rodríguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2002). How in spite of the rhetoric, history of chemistry has been ignored in presenting atomic structure in textbooks. Science & Education,
Rosé, C. P., Roque, A., Bhembe, D., & Vanlehn, K. (2003). A hybrid text classification approach for analysis of student essays. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 03 workshop on building educational applications using natural language processing, Vol. 2 (pp. 68–75). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education,
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education,
Villalon, J., Kearney, P., Calvo, R. A., & Reimann, P. (2008). Glosser: Enhanced feedback for student writing tasks. In Proceedings of the 2008 eighth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 454–458). IEEE Computer Society.
Wilkinson, J. (1999). A quantitative analysis of physics textbooks for scientific literacy themes. Research in Science Education,
Yang, Y., & Pedersen, J. O. (1997). A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proceedings of 14th international conference on machine learning, pp. 412–420, Nashville, US.
Zanasi, A. (2009). Virtual weapons for real wars: Text mining for national security. In E. Corchado, R. Zunino, P. Gastaldo, & Á. Herrero (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop on computational intelligence in security for information systems CISIS’08 (Vol. 53, pp. 53–60). Berlin: Springer.