Science & Education

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 1381–1402 | Cite as

Kampourakis, K. (ed.) (2013): The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators

Springer, Dordrecht, ISBN: 978-94-007-6536-8, 762 pp, price: US $ 219.00
Book Review

References

  1. Allchin, D. (2000). Mending mendelism. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 633–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., & Matthews, D. (2002). Adaptationism: How to carry out an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 489–553.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, W. (2011). Evolution: A developmental approach. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Behe, M. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York, NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  5. Caponi, G. (2011). La Segunda Agenda Darwiniana. Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano, México, DC: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos.Google Scholar
  6. Corcos, A., & Monaghan, F. (1985). Some myths about Mendel’s experiments. The American Biology Teacher, 47, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craver, C., & Bechtel, W. (2006). Mechanism. In S. Sarkar & J. Pfeifer (Eds.), Philosophy of science: An encyclopedia (pp. 469–478). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species (1st ed.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  9. Dawkins, R. (1996). The blind watchmaker (2nd ed.). New York-NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York-NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. El-Hani CN (2014a) Downward determination as a propensity-changing non-causal relation. Submitted to biology and philosophy.Google Scholar
  12. El-Hani CN (2014b) Mendel in genetics teaching: Some contributions from history of science and articles for teachers. Science & Education, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. El-Hani, C. N., & Mortimer, E. F. (2007). Multicultural education, pragmatism, and the goals of science teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 657–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Hani, C. N., Queiroz, J., & Emmeche, C. (2009). Genes, information, and semiosis. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gericke, N. M., & Hagberg, M. (2007). Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understandings of genetics. Science & Education, 16, 849–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gericke, N. M., Hagberg, M., Santos, V. C., Joaquim, L. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2014). Conceptual variation or incoherence? Textbook discourse on genes in six countries. Science & Education, 23, 381–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1999). Adaptationism and the power of selection. Biology and Philosophy, 14, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001). Three kinds of adaptationism. In S. H. Orzac & E. Sober (Eds.), Adaptationism and optimality (pp. 335–357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gould, S. J. (2002). Rocks of ages. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 205, 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths, P. E., & Knight, R. D. (1998). What is the developmentalist challenge? Philosophy of Science, 65, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20, 591–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson P (1993/2001) Creator or Blind Watchmaker? In: R. Pennock (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics (pp. 435–449). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kampourakis, K. (2013). Mendel and the path to genetics: Portraying science as a social process. Science & Education, 22, 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kant I (1790/1987) Critique of Judgment. Indianapolis, IL: Hackett Publ.Google Scholar
  27. Keller, E. F. (2000). The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Keller, E. F. (2005). The century beyond the gene. Journal of Biosciences, 30, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lennox, J. G. (1993). Darwin was a teleologist. Biology and Philosophy, 8, 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science to features of science. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Monod, J. (1971). Chance and necessity: An essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
  32. Moss, L. (2003). What genes can’t do. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mossio, M., & Moreno, A. (2010). Organisational closure in biological organisms. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32, 269–288.Google Scholar
  34. Mossio, M., Saborido, C., & Moreno, A. (2009). An organizational account of biological functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 813–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newman, S. A., Forgacs, G., & Müller, G. B. (2006). Before programs: The physical origination of multicellular forms. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 50, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pigliucci, M., & Muller, G. B. (2010). Elements of an extended evolutionary synthesis. In M. Pigliucci & G. B. Muller (Eds.), Evolution: The extended synthesis (pp. 3–17). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reeve, H. K., & Keller, L. (1999). Levels of selection: Burying the units-of-selection debate and unearthing the crucial new issues. In L. Keller (Ed.), Levels of selection in evolution (pp. 3–14). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sepulveda, C., Meyer, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2011). Adaptacionismo. In P. Abrantes (Org) (Ed.), Filosofia da Biologia (pp. 162–192). Porto Alegre: ARTMED.Google Scholar
  39. Shubin, N., Tabin, C., & Carroll, S. (2009). Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature, 457, 818–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and death: An introduction to the philosophy of biology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of BiologyFederal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations