Baser, M. (2006). Effects of conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers’ understanding of direct current circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5–6), 367–381.
Bayraktar, S. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,
Benzi, M. (2009). The history of numerical linear algebra. SIAM conference on applied liner algebra.
Brukner, C., & Zeilinger, A. (2005). Quantum physics as a science of information. In A. Elitzur, S. Dolev, & N. Kolenda (Eds.), Quo vadis quantum mechanics?. Berlin: Springer.
Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., et al. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica™: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology,
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press.
Cartwright, N. (1999). Models and the limits of theory: quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS model of superconductivity. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: perspective on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education,
Christian, W., & Belloni, M. (2001). Physlets: Teaching physics with interactive curricular material. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Confrey, J., & Doerr, H. (1994). Student modelers. Interactive Learning Environments,
Crippen, K. J., Archambault, L. M. & Kern, C. L. (2012). The nature of laboratory learning experiences in secondary science online. Research in Science Education. Online First doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9301-6.
de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharias, C. Z. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308.
de Jong, T., Martin, E., Zamarro, J.-M., Esquembre, F., Swaak, J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1999). The integration of computer simulation and learning support: an example from the physics domain of collisions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
de Jong, T., & Njoo, M. (1992). Learning and instruction with computer simulation: Learning processes involved. In E. de Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 411–427). Berlin: Springer.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research,
Doerr, H. (1996). STELLA: Ten years later. A review of the literature. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,
Doerr, H. (1997). Experiment, simulation and analysis: An integrated instructional approach to the concept of force. International Journal of Science Education,
Dowling, D. (1999). Experimenting on theories. Science in Context,
Durán, J. M. (2013). Explaining simulated phenomena. A defense of the epistemic power of computer simulations. PhD Thesis. Stuttgart University.
Fox Keller, E. (2003). Models, simulations and “computer experiments”. In H. Radder (Ed.), The philosophy of scientific experimentation. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
Frigg, R., & Reiss, J. (2009). The philosophy of simulation: Hot issues or same old stew? Synthese,
Galison, P. (1987). How experiments end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galison, P. (1996). Computer simulation and the trading zone. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump (Eds.), The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gière, R. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J. & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In: J. K. Gilbert, & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Guala, F. (2005). The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guillemot, H. (2010). Connections between simulations and observation in climate computer modeling. Scientist′s practices and “bottom-up epistemology” lessons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halloun, I. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education,
Hargrave, C. P., & Kenton, J. M. (2000). Pre instructional simulations: Implications for science classroom teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,
Harper, W. L. (2011). Isaac Newton’s scientific method: Turning data into evidence about gravity and cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hennessy, S. (2006). Integrating technology into teaching and learning of school science: A situated perspective on pedagogical issues in research. Studies in Science Education,
Hooker, C. A. (2011). Introduction to philosophy of complex systems. Part B. In C. A. Hooker (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems, Vol. 10 (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science) Oxford: Elsevier.
Hsu, Y.-S., & Thomas, R. A. (2002). The impacts of a web-aided instructional simulation on science learning. International Journal of Science Education,
Hughes, R. I. G. (1999). The Ising model, computer simulation, and universal physics. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. New York: Oxford University Press.
Huppert, J., & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: Students’ cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education,
Izquierdo, M., & Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2003). Epistemological foundations of school science. Science & Education,
Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Jackson, S., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1996). Making system dynamics modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Interactive Learning Environments,
Johnson, A., & Lenhard, J. (2011). Toward a new culture of prediction. Computational modeling in the era of desktop computing. In A. Nordmann, et al. (Eds.), Science transformed? Debating claims of an epochal break. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kaput, J. J. (1995). Creating cyberetic and psychological ramps from the concrete to the abstract: Examples from multiplicate structure. In D. N. Perkins & J. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 130–154). London: Oxford University Press.
Kaufmann, W. J., & Smarr, L. L. (1993). Supercomputing and the transformation of science. New York: Scientific American Library.
Kirschner, P., & Huisman, W. (1998). Dry laboratories in science education; computer-based practical work. International Journal of Science Education,
Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., & Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: A critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science & Education,
Kukkonen, J., Kärkkäinen, S. Dillon, P., & Keinonen, T. (2013). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-graders’ representations of the greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education. First on-line, 2013. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.782452.
Küppers, G. & Lenhard, J. (2005). Validation of simulation: Patterns in the social and natural sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(4)3. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/3.html.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Lenhard, J. (2010). Computation and simulation. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The oxford handbook on interdisciplinarity (pp. 246–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu, H.-C., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. (2008). The impact of learner’s prior knowledge on their use of chemistry computer simulations: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology,
Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. Lederman & S. Abel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393–441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mandinach, E. (1989). Model-building and the use of computer simulation of dynamic systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research,
Marshall, J. A., & Young, E. S. (2006). Preservice teachers’ theory development in physical and simulate environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mindell, D. (2002). Between human and machine: Feedback, control, and computing before cybernetics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Monaghan, J. M., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Use of a computer simulation to develop mental simulations for learning relative motion concepts. International Journal of Science Education,
Morgan, M. (2003). Experiments without material intervention: Model experiments, virtual experiments and virtually experiments. In Hans. Radder (Ed.), The philosophy of scientific experimentation (pp. 216–235). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Morgan, M. S., & Morrison, M. (Eds.). (1999). Models as mediators: Perspective on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council. (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nola, R. (2004). Pendula, models, constructivism and reality. Science & Education,
Norton, S., & Suppe, F. (2001). Why atmospheric modeling is good science. In C. Miller & P. Edwards (Eds.), Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ören, T. I. (2011a). The many facets of simulation through a collection of about 100 definitions. SCS M&S Magazine,
Ören, T. I. (2011b). A critical review of definitions and about 400 types of modeling and simulation. SCS M&S Magazine,
Osborne, J. F., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the ‘expert’ community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Özmen, H., Demircioğlu, G., & Coll, R. (2009). A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experience on Turkish high school students’ understanding of acid-base chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books Inc.
Parker, W. S. (2009). Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality. Synthese,
Plass, J. L., Milne, C., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., Hayward, E. O., Jordan, T., et al. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Rohrlich, F. (1991). Computer simulations in the physical sciences. In A. Fine, M. Forbes, & L. Wessels (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1990 philosophy of science association biennial meetings (pp. 507–518). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., & Irvin, P. S. ( 2011). Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1050–1078.
Scheckler, R. K. (2003). Virtual labs: A substitute for traditional labs? International Journal of Developmental Biology,
Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laube, S., & Griggs, P. (2008). An epistemological approach to modeling: Cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education,
Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2009). The relation between students’ epistemological understanding of computer models and their cognitive processing in a modeling task. International Journal of Science Education,
Sismondo, S. (1999). Models, simulations and their objects. Science in Context,
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education,
Snir, J., Smith, C. L., & Raz, G. (2003). Linking phenomena with competing underlying models: A software tool for introducing students to the particulate model. Science Education,
Steed, M. (1992). STELLA, a simulation construction kit: Cognitive process and educational implications. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,
Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students’ dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing, reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology,
Suárez, M. (1999). The role of models in application of scientific theories: Epistemological implications. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sundberg, M. (2010a). Organizing simulation code collectives. Science Studies,
Sundberg, M. (2010b). Cultures of simulations vs. cultures of calculations? The development of simulation practices in meteorology and astrophysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,
Tao, P., & Gunstone, R. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Teodoro, V. D. (2002). Modellus: Learning physics with mathematical modeling. PhD Thesis.
Thornton, R. K. (1987). Tools for scientific thinking-microcomputer-based laboratories for physics teaching. Physics Education,
Triona, L., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students’ ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction,
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Touchstone.
Turkle, S. (2009). Simulation and its discontents. Cambridge: MIT Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Waight, N., Liu, X., Gregorius, R., Smith, E. & Park, M. (2013). Teacher conceptions and approaches associated with an immersive instructional implementation of computer-based models and assessment in a secondary chemistry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, On line First. doi:09500693.2013.787506
Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
White, B. Y. (1984). Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton’s laws of motion. Cognition and Instruction,
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction,
Windschitl, M. (2001). Using simulations in the middle school: Does assertiveness of dyad partners influence conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 23(1), 17–32.
Winsberg, E. (1999). Sanctioning models: The epistemology of simulation. Science in Context,
Winsberg, E. (2003). Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science, 70, 105–125.
Winsberg, E. (2010). Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education,
Zacharia, Z. C. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Zacharia, Z. C., & Anderson, O. R. (2003). The effects of an interactive computer-based simulations prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiments on students’ conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics,
Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,