Abstract
This paper scrutinizes the contribution of Rómulo de Carvalho to the development of the Portuguese science curriculum, arguing that it was critically informed by his lifetime inclination to the humanities. It focuses on a particular historical event: the 1948 chemistry programme for the secondary school ‘Liceus’. The paper briefly reviews the educational situation during Salazarism, and how Carvalho and others worked against Salazar’s anti-liberal idealism. The concept of humanistic science education is also reviewed. The article provides a general overview of Carvalho’s activities in poetry, the history of science, and in education, and argues that the work of this multifaceted man was geared towards the need for context and meaningfulness in ordinary human life. In 1948, a shift in chemistry teaching is identified, from one that is less meaningful to students’ everyday lives to one that is more humanistic in nature. This shift, introduced by Carvalho, brought about radical measures such as the controversial suppression of chemical equations and concepts. The article also provides an account of Carvalho’s rationale for such changes and concludes with a discussion of the significance of the reform for Carvalho and for Portuguese science education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The reform happened in 1947, but the new programmes were only introduced in 1948.
Carvalho directed the Gazeta de Física, which aimed “to contribute actively to the development and elevation of physics studies in Portugal”, “to clarify the real position of the physics intervention in modern life to a vaster public”, and to “promote in everybody, including industrials, a greater interest for the ‘profession’ of physicist” (Gibert 1946, p.1). He also directed the journal Palestra, which aimed at being pedagogically useful to the whole community of liceal teachers, especially trainee teachers.
“Automatized” is meant as a teaching style where students blindly repeat concepts, names, sentences, etc., which they are unable to grasp the meaning of.
It can be claimed that regardless of the teaching style, some kind of meaning is always communicated. By “meaningless education”, it is meant the kind of education which is not particularly interested in peoples’ ordinary lives or everyday phenomena; therefore perhaps less relevant to the majority of secondary students.
Although technical, automatized, and meaningless education may overlap in terms of characteristics, I am not suggesting they are synonymous. Nevertheless they are still opposed to the ideal of a liberal education.
Carvalho has left a large archive with information about his personal and professional life, including a great amount of letters he received with comments about his works. His personal papers are now located at the Portuguese National Library in Lisbon.
This may be an exaggeration. Considering Carvalho’s knowledge about foreign educational publications, it is likely Carvalho wrote his chemistry programme with their virtual support. Nevertheless, this cannot be guaranteed since by 1948 Carvalho had not published any pedagogical work in regards to teaching chemistry (either content or methodology).
During a certain period of the Salazarist regime, it was compulsory for some teachers to write up a report with details of their professional activities. The content was diverse, but it still constitutes a rich historical consulting source. There are only three of Carvalho’s reports available. One refers to the 1934–1935 period and the others to the 1948–1949 and 1949–1950 academic years.
In the literature, “Lessons on Common Things” are described as oral lessons illustrated by apparatus, models, and experiments. Although scientific knowledge was communicated, their objective was not to foster future scientists. “Lessons on Common Things” were also seen as those which could provide useful knowledge, help pupils understand the surrounding world, help them in performing their professional activities (Layton 1973, pp. 24–27), and should constitute elementary science in so far as they helped pupils “to observe some of the facts of nature upon which natural science is founded” (Jenkins 1979, pp. 38–39).
Certainly cognition is an overloaded concept. Nonetheless, I used this term for I believe everyone agrees it is somehow generally linked with people’s learning process, which encompasses motivation, teaching settings, content, etc.
The text, found in the section “Notes and Correspondence”, is not an academic article but a personal opinion of the referred teacher on how chemical equations should be taught in the general science course which precedes the teaching of symbol equations.
He exemplified:
\( {\text{mercury}}\,{\text{oxide}}\mathop{\longrightarrow}\limits^{\text{heat}}{\text{mercury}} + {\text{oxygen}}\,{\text{and}}\,{\text{potassium}}\,{\text{chlorate}}\mathop{\longrightarrow}\limits^{\text{heat}}{\text{potassium}}\,{\text{chloride}} + {\text{oxygen}} \).
References
Alves, L. A. M. (2009). Ensino Técnico—uma necessidade ou uma falácia? Notas para a compreensão da filosofia do ensino técnico em Portugal. In L. A. M. Alves, P. R. d Sousa, T. T. Morais, & F. M. V. Araújo (Eds.), Ensino Técnico (1756–1973) (pp. 17–55). Lisboa: Editorial do Ministério da Educação.
Araújo, J. M. d. (2006). Rómulo de Carvalho na Universidade do Porto. Porto: Editora da Universidade do Porto.
Auretta, C., & Santos, A. M. Nd. (1993). Uma conversa com Rómulo de Carvalho/António Gedeão. Gazeta de Física, 16(1), 2–8.
Baiôa, M., Fernandes, P. J., & Meneses, F. R. d. (2003). The political history of twentieth-century portugal. e-Journal of Portuguese History, 1(2), 1–18.
Barroso, J. (1995). Os Liceus: Organização Pedagógica e Administração (1936–1960) (Vol. I). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Beato, C. (2003). A disciplina de Ciências Físico-Químicas da reforma liceal de 1947. Dissertação de mestrado: Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.
Boyd, W. (1952). The history of western education. London: Adam & Charles Black.
Brock, W. H. (1973). H.E. Armstrong and the teaching of science 1880–1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caraça, B. d. J. (1947). Prefácio. In B. d. J. Caraça (Ed.), Panorama de Ciência Contemporânea, Colecção Cosmos-Gigante (Vol. I). Lisboa: Cosmos.
Carvalho, R. d. (1947). A Ciência Hermética. Lisboa: Cosmos.
Carvalho, R. d. (1948). Embalsamamento Egípcio. Lisboa: Cosmos.
Carvalho, R. d. (1951a). Esclarecimento. Labor, 115, 55–57.
Carvalho, R. d. (1951b). O ensino das fórmulas e das equações químicas no 2° Ciclo do ensino liceal. Labor, 113, 198–205.
Carvalho, R. d. (1951c). Rascunho de carta de Carvalho para Teixeira no dia 22 de Outubro de 1951. Biblioteca Nacional de Lisboa, Espólio 40, Caixa 3, pasta “Labor”.
Carvalho, M. A. (1952). Relatório Oficial do ano 1951–1952. Ministério da Educação Nacional, Fundo DGEL “Relatório dos professores”, caixa 12, Arquivo Histórico No 621.
Carvalho, R. d. (1952). Compêndio de Química para o 2° ciclo (texto). Lisboa: Arquivo Histórico do Ministério da Educação, Fundo DGEL.
Carvalho, R. d. (1968). Física para o Povo (Vol. 1 e 2). Coimbra: Atlântida.
Carvalho, R. d. (1986). História do Ensino em Portugal—Desde a Fundação da Nacionalidade até o fim do Regime de Salazar-Caetano. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Carvalho, F. (2006). Rómulo de Carvalho: um perfil e um testemunho pessoal. As inclinações da juventude e a escolha da profissão. Paper presented at Conferência Nacional de Física, Aveiro. Publication: http://www.100anos-romulogedeao.info/agenda/files/SPFisica-Aveiro-06Set06-site.doc.
Carvalho, R. d. (2010). Memórias. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Carvalho, R. d. (1948b). Relatório Oficial do ano 1947–1948. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação Nacional, Fundo DGEL “Relatório dos professores”, caixa 02, Arquivo Histórico No 107.
Carvalho, R. d. (1949). Relatório Oficial do ano 1948–1949 Lisboa: Ministério da Educacao Nacional, Fundo DGEL “Relatório dos professores”, caixa 05, Arquivo Histórico No 292.
Costa, A. M. d. (1997). Rómulo de Carvalho. Gazeta de Física, XX(1).
Couto, J. (2006). Apresentação. In M. Rêgo & F. Lopes (Eds.), Antonio é o meu nome, Rómulo de Carvalho (pp. 9–11). Lisboa: Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal.
Crato, N. (2006). O professor é o método, o processo, a forma e o modo. In M. Rêgo & F. Lopes (Eds.), Antonio é o meu nome, Rômulo de Carvalho (pp. 23–28). Lisboa: Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal.
Decree 3 (1905). Portugal: Ministério da Instrução Pública, Diário do Governo de 3 de Novembro de 1905, I Série, No 250.
Decree 27084 (1936). Portugal: Ministério da Educação Nacional, Diário do Governo de 14 de Outubro, I Série, No 241.
Decree 36507 (1947). Portugal: Ministério da Educação Nacional, Diário do Governo de 17 de Setembro, I Série, No 216.
Decree 37112 (1948). Portugal: Ministério da Educação Nacional, Diário do Governo de 22 de Outubro, I Série, No 247.
Decree 39807 (1954). Portugal: Ministério da Educacao Nacional, Diário do Governo de 7 de Setembro, I Série, No 198.
Donnelly, J. (2004). Humanizing Science Education. Science Education, 88(5), 762–784.
Donnelly, J., & Ryder, J. (2011). The pursuit of humanity: Curriculum change in English school science. History of Education, 40(3), 291–313.
Doutoramento “Honoris Causa” do Dr. Rómulo de Carvalho (1995). Évora: Universidade de Évora.
Fitas, A. (2005). The Portuguese academic community and the theory of relativity. e-Journal of Portuguese History, 3(2), 1–15.
Fitas, A., & Videira, A. (2007). Guido Beck, Alexandre Proca, and the Oporto Theoretical Physics Seminar. Physics in Perspective, 9(1), 4–25.
Gibert, A. (1946). Em nome da Direcção. Gazeta de Física, I(1), 1–3.
Goinhas, C. d. L. F. (1952). Relatório Oficial do ano 1951–1952. Ministério da Educação Nacional, Fundo DGEL “Relatório dos professores”, caixa 14.
Grácio, S. (1986). Política Educativa como Tecnologia Social: As reformas do ensino técnico de 1948 e 1983. Lisboa: Livros Horizontes.
Guimarães, F. (1996). A Poesia como ‘Máquina de Fogo’. Jornal das Letras/Educação, 19.
Jenkins, E. W. (1979). From Armstrong to Nuffield. London: John Murray.
Layton, D. (1973). Science for the people. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Manso, A. (2009). Bento de Jesus Caraça: A Demanda pela Educação Integral do Indivíduo. Paper presented at the X Congresso da SPCE (CdRom):10_Cmcs_AT6_Pluralidade do Conhecimento e Educação Mesa no 42—Comunicação no 56, Bragança, 30 de Abril a 2 de Maio de 2009.
Marques, F. M. (2003). Os Liceus de Portugal: Arquitetura, Currículo e Poder. Lisboa: Educa.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. London: Routledge.
Mónica, M. F. (1978). Educação e Sociedade no Portugal de Salazar. Lisboa: Editorial Presença/Gabinete de Investigações Sociais.
Mota, C. A. (2000). António Sérgio: Pedagogo e Político. Porto: Cadernos do Caos.
Nóvoa, A., Barroso, J., & Ó, J. M. N. R. d. (2003). O Todo Poderoso Império do Meio. In A. Nóvoa & A. T. Santa-Clara (Eds.), Liceus de Portugal: Histórias, Arquivos, Memórias (pp. 17–73). Porto: ASA Editores.
Ó, J. M. N. R. d. (2002). O Governo de si mesmo. Lisboa: Tese de doutoramento, Universidade de Lisboa.
Pintassilgo, J. (2006a). Imprensa de Educação e Ensino: Universidades populares e renovação pedagógica. Cadernos de História da Educação, 5, 83–94.
Pintassilgo, J. (2006b). O Debate Sobre as Universidades Populares na Imprensa Portuguesa de Educação e Ensino: O Exemplo de “A Vida Portuguesa” (1912–1915). HISTEDBR On-line, 24, 93–101.
Rosa, R. N. (2002). O Pensamento e a obra de Rómulo de Carvalho no contexto de sua época. Vértice, 104, 81–95.
Rosas, F. (1986). O Estado Novo nos Anos Trinta: Elementos para o Estudo da Natureza Económica e Social do Salazarismo (1928–1938). Lisboa: Editorial Estampa.
Santos, A. M. N. d. (1997). Meu caro Dr. Rómulo de Carvalho. Gazeta de Física, XX(1).
Schwab, J. (1978). Eros and Education: A discussion of One Aspect of Discussion. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Snow, C. P. (2002). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer, H. (1861). Education: intellectual, moral and physical. London: Watts & Co.
Teixeira, J. A. (1951a). Comentando um esclarecimento. Labor, 116, 223–230.
Teixeira, J. A. (1951b). De novo os programas. Labor, 114, 273–284.
Teixeira, J. A. (1951c). Programas e Pontos de Exame. Algumas Notas. Labor, 112, 115–120.
Tilston, J. (1949). The teaching of symbols, formulae and equations in chemistry. School Science Review, 30(112), 429–432.
Valente, V. P. (1973). O Estado Liberal e o Ensino: Os Liceus Portugueses (1834–1930). Lisboa: Gabinete de Investigações Sociais do Instituto Superior de Economia.
Vasconcelos, J. C. d. (1989). 14/03) (pp. 8–11). António Gedeão: Ele sabe—e sonha. Jornal das Letras.
Westbury, I., & Wilkof, N. (1978). Introduction. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and science education. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galamba, A. Rómulo de Carvalho’s Humanistic Chemistry Syllabus in the 1948 Portuguese Liceal Reform. Sci & Educ 22, 1519–1536 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9488-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9488-y