Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Clement, J. (2008a). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. New York: Springer.
Book
Google Scholar
Clement, J. (2008b). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 417–452). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Ericsson, A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist,
49, 725–747.
Article
Google Scholar
Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and teaching. Science Education,
92, 404–423.
Article
Google Scholar
Hennessey, M., & Beeth, M. (1993). Students’ reflective thoughts about science content: A relationship to conceptual change learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (pp. 1–32).
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Limon, L. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction,
11, 357–380.
Article
Google Scholar
Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (1999). Concepts: Core readings. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Millman, A., & Smith, C. (1997). Darwin’s use of analogical reasoning in theory construction. Metaphor and Symbol,
12(3), 159–187.
Article
Google Scholar
Minstrell, J., & Kraus, P. (2005). Guided Inquiry in the Science Classroom. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: Science in the classroom (pp. 475–511). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Mosher, F. (2011) The Role of Learning Progressions in Standards based Education Reform, CPRE Policy Briefs, pp. 1–14.
National Research Council (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. R. Duschl, H. Schweingruber, and A. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nersessian, N. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education,
66, 211–227.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth grade students’ epistemologies of science: The impact of school science on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction,
18(3), 349–422.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives,
4(1 & 2), 1–98.
Article
Google Scholar
Wiser, M., Smith, C., & Doubler, S. Learning progressions as tool for curriculum development: Lessons from the inquiry project. In A. Alonzo & A. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in sciences. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing (in press).