Abstract
It is an unfortunate fact of academic life that there is a sharp divide between science and philosophy, with scientists often being openly dismissive of philosophy, and philosophers being equally contemptuous of the naiveté of scientists when it comes to the philosophical underpinnings of their own discipline. In this paper I explore the possibility of reducing the distance between the two sides by introducing science students to some interesting philosophical aspects of research in evolutionary biology, using biological theories of the origin of religion as an example. I show that philosophy is both a discipline in its own right as well as one that has interesting implications for the understanding and practice of science. While the goal is certainly not to turn science students into philosophers, the idea is that both disciplines cannot but benefit from a mutual dialogue that starts as soon as possible, in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aoki, K. (1986). A stochastic model of gene-culture coevolution suggested by the “culture historical hypothesis” for the evolution of adult lactose absorption in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 83, 2929–2933.
Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr’s ‘ultimate/proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 553–565.
Aristotle. (1998). The metaphysics. Translated by Hugh Lawson-Tancred. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987). Testing a point null hypothesis: The irreconcilability of p values and evidence. Journal of American Statistical Association, 82, 112–122.
Blackmore, S. J. (2000). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blanke, O., Ortigue, S., Landis, T., & Seeck, M. (2002). Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419, 269–270.
Boyer, P. (2008). Religion: Bound to believe? Nature, 455, 1038–1039.
Brigandt, I., & Love, A. (2008). Reductionism in biology. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/reduction-biology/.
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Berlin: Springer.
Chamberlin, T. C. (1890). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, 15, 92–96.
Cleland, C. E. (2001). Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific method. Geology, 29, 987–990.
Cleland, C. E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science, 69, 474–496.
Cleland, C. E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, advanced online publication, 25 February 2011.
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
Corfield, D., & Williamson, J. (2001). Foundations of Bayesianism. Berlin: Springer.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection: Or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
De Pierris, G., & Friedman, M. (2008). Kant and Hume on causality. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/kant-hume-causality/.
Dennett, D. (1996). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon and Schuster, p. 21.
Depew, D. (2008). Consequence etiology and biological teleology in Aristotle and darwin. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C, 39, 379–390.
Feldman, M. W., & Laland, K. N. (1996). Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 453–457.
Flack, J. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2000). Any animal whatever: Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, 1–29.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). The split brain revisited. Scientific American, 287, 26–31.
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B205, 581–598.
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.
Hone, W. D. E., Keesey, T. M., Pisani, D., & Purvis, A. (2005). Macroevolutionary trends in the Dinosauria: Cope’s rule. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 587–595.
Hume, D. (1748/1952). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Forgotten Books.
Huxley, J. S. (1942/2010). Evolution: The modern synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kant, I. (1783/2004). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, J. H. (2002). Historical evidence and human adaptation. Philosophy of Science, 69, S294–S304.
Kaplan, J. M., & Pigliucci, M. (2001). Genes ‘for’ phenotypes: A modern history view. Biology and Philosophy, 16, 189–213.
Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers (Vol 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manson, J. H., Perry, S., & Parish, A. R. (1997). Nonconceptive sexual behavior in bonobos and Capuchins. International Journal of Primatology, 18, 767–786.
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.
Newberg, A., D’Aquili, E., & Rause, V. (2002). Why God won’t go away: Brain science and the biology of belief. New York: Random House.
Nix, T. W. & Barnette, J. J. (1998). The data analysis dilemma: Ban or abandon. A review of null hypothesis significance testing. Research in the Schools, 5, 3–14.
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.
O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2009). Emergent properties. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/properties-emergent/.
Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pigliucci, M. (2002). Denying evolution: Creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Pigliucci, M. (2003). From molecules to phenotypes?-The promise and limits of integrative biology. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 297–306.
Pigliucci, M., & Kaplan, J. (2000). The fall and rise of Dr. Pangloss: Adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 55–70.
Pigliucci, M., & Kaplan, J. (2006). Making sense of evolution: The conceptual foundations of evolutionary biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Price, G. R. (1970). Selection and covariance. Nature, 227, 520–521.
Pyysiainen, I., & Hauser, M. (2009). The origins of religion: Evolved adaptation or by-product? Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 104–109.
Richerson, P. J., & Newson, L. (2009). Is religion adaptive? Yes, no, neutral, but mostly we don’t know. In M. J. Murray & J. Schloss (Eds.), The believing primate: Scientific, philosophical and theological perspectives on the evolution of religion (pp. 100–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzolatti, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Brain Structure & Function, 210, 419–421.
Schloss, J. (2009). Evolutionary theories of religion. Science unfettered or naturalism run wild? In M. J. Murray & J. Schloss (Eds.), The believing primate: Scientific, philosophical and theological perspectives on the evolution of religion (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1999). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weinberg, S. (1994). Against philosophy (pp. 166–190). In dreams of a final theory. New York: Vintage.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Williams, G. C. (1992). Natural selection: Domains, levels, and challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.
Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Wilson, D. S. (2007). Evolutionary religious studies (ERS): A Beginner’s guide. http://evolution.binghamton.edu/religion/resources/guide/.
Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pigliucci, M. When Science Studies Religion: Six Philosophy Lessons for Science Classes. Sci & Educ 22, 49–67 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9355-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9355-2