Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 1039–1053 | Cite as

Towards a Critical Re-Appraisal of Ecology Education: Scheduling an Educational Intervention to Revisit the ‘Balance of Nature’ Metaphor

  • Tasos Hovardas
  • Konstantinos Korfiatis
Article

Abstract

The ‘Balance of Nature’ metaphor is a pervasive idea in ecology. However, the scientific community acknowledged during the last decades that equilibrium conditions are rare, while disturbance events are not uncommon. We suggest that the exclusive teaching of the ‘Balance of Nature’ metaphor produces cultural, scientific and learning misconceptions about the structure and function of nature. We outline an exemplary educational intervention for high school students to exhibit that the use of computer simulations could serve important educational goals in ecology and environmental education, such as the liberation of the concept of ‘balance’ of its metaphysic burden, the comprehension of the dynamics and the systemic nature of ecological processes and the appreciation of the mutual relation between society and nature.

Keywords

Protected Area High School Student Environmental Education Target Domain Source Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allee, W. C. (1931). Animal aggregations. A study in General Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Assaraf, O. B.-Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, 11, 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonta, M. (2005). Becoming-forest, becoming-local: Transformations of a protected area in Honduras. Geoforum, 36, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrete, M., & Donázar, J. A. (2005). Application of central-place foraging theory shows the importance of Mediterranean dehesas for the conservation of the cinereous vulture, Aegypius monachus. Biological Conservation, 126, 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catsadorakis, G., Kati, V., Liarikos, C., Poirazidis, K., Skartsi, T., Vasilakis, D., et al. (2010). Conservation and management issues for the Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park. In C. Catsadorakis & H. Källander (Eds.), Τhe Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park, Greece: Biodiversity, management, and conservation (pp. 265–279). Athens: WWF-International.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, G. (2001). Must there be a balance of nature? Biology and Philosophy, 16, 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, G. (2003). The science of the struggle of existence: On the foundations of ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuddington, K. (2001). The balance of nature metaphor and equilibrium in population ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 16, 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demetriou, D., Korfiatis, K., & Constantinou, C. (2009). Comprehending trophic relations through food web construction. Journal of Biological Education, 43, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Des Jardins, J. R. (2005). Scientific ecology and ecological ethics: The challenges of drawing ethical conclusions from scientific facts. In E. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Environmental education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 31–49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, Ch., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth-graders and sixth-graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evanoff, R. J. (2005). Reconciling realism and constructivism in environmental ethics. Environmental Values, 14, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fall, J. (2002). Divide and rule: Constructing human boundaries in ‘boundless nature’. GeoJournal, 58, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferguson, T. (2008). ‘Nature’ and the ‘environment’ in Jamaica’s primary school curriculum guides. Environmental Education Research, 14, 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gough, A. (2002). Mutualism: A different agenda for environmental and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1201–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grotzer, T. A., & Basca, B. B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students’ understanding? Journal of Biological Education, 38, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grumbine, R. E. (1997). Reflections on ecosystem management. Conservation Biology, 11, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haila, Y., & Levins, R. (1992). Humanity and nature: Ecology, science and society. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hallmann, B. (1998). The black vultures of Greece. In: E. Tewes, J. J. Sánchez, B. Heredia, & V. L. M. Bijleveld (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium on the black vulture in south-eastern Europe and adjacent regions (pp. 27–32). Palma de Mallorca: BVCF/FZG.Google Scholar
  22. High Performance Systems, Inc. (1984). STELLA. New Hampshire, Lebanon: Isee Systems.Google Scholar
  23. Hovardas, T. (1999). The Dadia Forest Reserve: The protected area, the local community, and ecotourism development. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University, School of Biology, MSc Thesis in Greek with an English summary.Google Scholar
  24. Hovardas, T. (2005). Social representations on ecotourismScheduling interventions in protected areas. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University, School of Biology, PhD Thesis in Greek with an English summary.Google Scholar
  25. Hovardas, T. (2010). The contribution of social science research to the management of the Dadia Forest Reserve: Nature’s face in society’s mirror. In C. Catsadorakis & H. Källander (Eds.), Τhe Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park, Greece: Biodiversity, management, and conservation (pp. 253–263). Athens: WWF-International.Google Scholar
  26. Hovardas, T., & Korfiatis, K. (2008). Framing environmental policy by the local press: Case study from the Dadia Forest Reserve, Greece. Forest Policy and Economics, 10, 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hovardas, T., & Poirazidis, K. (2007). Environmental policy beliefs of stakeholders in protected area management. Environmental Management, 39, 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hovardas, T., & Stamou, G. P. (2006a). Structural and narrative reconstruction of rural residents’ representations of ‘nature’, ‘wildlife’, and ‘landscape’. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 1745–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hovardas, T., & Stamou, G. P. (2006b). Structural and narrative reconstruction of representations on ‘nature’, ‘environment’, and ‘ecotourism’. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hurford, A., Hebblewhite, M., & Lewis, M. A. (2006). A spatially explicit model for an Allee effect: why wolves recolonize so slowly in Greater Yellowstone. Theoretical Population Biology, 70, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ibarra, M. J., & Gil, Q. M. J. (2009). Use of ecological concepts by secondary school students: The prediction of changes in ecosystems. Ensenanza De Las Ciencias, 27, 19–31.Google Scholar
  32. Jelinski, D. E. (2005). There is no mother nature—There is no balance of nature: Culture, ecology and conservation. Human Ecology, 33, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jordan, R., & Duncan, R. G. (2009). Student teachers’ images of science in ecology and genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 43, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jungck, J., Gaff, H., & Weisstein, A. (2010). Mathematical manipulative models: In defense of ‘beanbag Biology’. CBE- Life Sciences Education, 9, 201–211.Google Scholar
  35. Kati, V., & Sekercioglu, C. H. (2006). Diversity, ecological structure, and conservation of the landbird community of Dadia reserve, Greece. Diversity and Distributions, 12, 620–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kingsland, S. (1995). Modeling nature (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kolasa, J., & Pickett, S. T. A. (2005). Changing academic perspectives of ecology: A view from within. In E. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Environmental education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 50–71). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Korfiatis, K. J. (2005). Environmental education and the science of ecology: Exploration of an uneasy relationship. Environmental Education Research, 11, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Korfiatis, K. J., Hovardas, T., Tsaliki, E., & Palmer, J. A. (2009). Rural children’s views on human activities and changes in a Greek wetland. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Korfiatis, K. J., Stamou, A. G., & Paraskevopoulos, S. (2004). Images of nature in Greek primary school textbooks. Science Education, 88, 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ladle, R. J., & Gilson, L. (2009). The (im)balance of nature: A public perception time-lag? Public Understanding of Science, 18, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mappin, M. J., & Johnson, E. A. (2005). Changing perspectives in ecology and education in environmental education. In E. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Environmental education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 1–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Matthews, M. R. (2009). Teaching the philosophical and worldview components of science. Science & Education, 18, 697–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McComas, W. F. (2002). The ideal environmental science curriculum: History, rationales, misconceptions & standards. American Biology Teacher, 64, 665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McComas, W. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McIntosh, R. P. (1985). The background of ecology, concepts and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Miri, B., David, B.-C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nicolson, M. (1990). Henry Allan gleason and the individualistic hypothesis: The structure of a botanist’s career. Botanical Review, 56, 91–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. NRC (National Research Council). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  52. Odum, E. P. (1959). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  53. Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 54–70). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  54. Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. P. (2009). A methodology for integrating computer-based learning tools in science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Penteriani, V., Otalora, F., & Ferrer, M. (2008). Floater mortality within settlement areas can explain the Allee effect in breeding populations. Ecological Modelling, 213, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pickett, S. T., Kolasa, J., & Jones, C. G. (1994). Ecological understanding: The nature of theory and the theory of nature. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Poirazidis, K., Goutner, V., Skartsi, T., & Stamou, G. P. (2004). Nesting habitat modelling as a conservation tool for the Eurasian black vulture Aegypius monachus in Dadia Nature Reserve, northeastern Greece. Biological Conservation, 118, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raia, F. (2008). Causality in complex dynamic systems: A challenge in earth systems science education. Journal of Geocience Education, 56, 81–94.Google Scholar
  59. Robbins, P. (2004). Political ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  60. Ross, H. (2007). Environment in the curriculum: Representation and development in the Scottish physical and social sciences. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 659–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sander, E., Jelemenská, P., & Kattmann, U. (2006). Towards a better understanding of ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 40, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sarkar, S. (2005). Biodiversity and environmental philosophy—An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Skartsi, T. (2002). Annual technical report: Population estimation and breeding success of the black vulture in 2002. Monitoring Plan of Dadia Forest, 2002. Athens: WWF-Greece (in Greek).Google Scholar
  64. Slingsby, D., & Barker, S. (2003). Making connections: Biology, environmental education and education for sustainable development. Journal of Biological Education, 38, 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephens, P. A., Sutherland, W. J., & Frekleton, R. P. (1999). What is Allee effect? Oikos, 87, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Storey, C., & Oliveira, H. (2004). Social representations and environmental education with a women’s group in Manaus, Amazonas-Brazil. Environmental Conservation, 31, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Weelie, D., & Wals, A. (2002). Making biodiversity meaningful through environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1143–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wagner, W., Elejabarrieta, F., & Lahnsteiner, I. (1995). How the sperm dominates the ovum—Objectification by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walter, G. H. (2008). Individuals, populations and the balance of nature: The question of persistence in ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 23, 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modelling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 171–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wood, B. (2000). Room for nature? Conservation management of the Isle of Rum, UK and prospects for large protected areas in Europe. Biological Conservation, 94, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Worster, D. (1994). Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Wu, J., & Loucks, O. (1995). From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 70, 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yliskylä-Peuralahti, J. (2003). Biodiversity—A new spatial challenge for Finnish agri-environmental policies? Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zimmerman, C., & Cuddington, K. (2007). Ambiguous, circular and polysemous: Students’ definitions of the ‘balance of nature’ metaphor. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Primary EducationUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations