Science & Education

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 1115–1134 | Cite as

Science and Theatre Education: A Cross-disciplinary Approach of Scientific Ideas Addressed to Student Teachers of Early Childhood Education

  • Vasilis TselfesEmail author
  • Antigoni Paroussi


There is, in Greece, an ongoing attempt to breach the boundaries established between the different teaching-learning subjects of compulsory education. In this context, we are interested in exploring to what degree the teaching and learning of ideas from the sciences’ “internal life” (Hacking, in: Pickering (ed) Science as practice and culture, 1992) benefits from creatively coming into contact with theatrical education as part of the corresponding curriculum subject. To this end, 57 students of the Early Childhood Education Department of the University of Athens were called to study extracts from Galileo’s Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican, to focus on a subject that the Dialogue’s “interlocutors” forcefully disagree about and to theatrically represent (using shadow theatre techniques) what they considered as being the central idea of this clash of opinions. The results indicate that this attempt leads to a satisfactory understanding of ideas relating to the content and methodology of the natural sciences. At the same time, theatrical education avails itself of the representation of scientific ideas and avoids the clichés and hackneyed techniques that the (often) simplistic choices available in the educational context of early childhood education tend towards. The basic reasons for both facets of this success are: (a) Genuine scientific texts force the students to approach them with seriousness, and all the more so if these recount the manner in which scientific ideas are produced and are embedded in the historical and social context of the age that created them; (b) The theatrical framework, which essentially guides the students’ activities, allows (if not obliges) them to approach scientific issues creatively; in other words, it allows them to create something related to science and recognize it as theirs; and, (c) Both the narrative texts describing processes of “science making” (Bruner, J Sci Educ Technol 1:5–12, 1992) and theatrical expression constitute fields that are characterized by what, for the students, is a common and understandable manner of expression: the narrative.


Science education Theatre education Teachers education Early childhood education Cross-disciplinarily 


  1. Barton D, Hamilton M (1998) Local literacies: reading and writing in our community. Rontledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell J (2000) Strings hands shadows: a modern puppet history. The Detroit Institute of Art, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenthal E (2005) Puppetry: a world history. Abrams, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner J (1992) Science education and teachers: a Karplus lecture. J Sci Educ Technol 1:5–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00700239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruner J (1996) The culture of education. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruner J (2002) Making stories: law, literature, life. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Develaki M (2007) Social and ethical dimension of the natural sciences, complex problems of the age, interdisciplinarity, and the contribution of education. Sci & Educ. Available via Accessed 26 May 2008
  8. Gould S (ed) (2001) Galileo Galilei, dialogue concerning the two chief world systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican. Translation: Drake S. Modern library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hacking I (1992) The self vindication of the laboratory sciences. In: Pickering A (ed) Science as practice and culture. The University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 29–64Google Scholar
  10. Hellenic Ministry of National Education-Pedagogical Institute (2004) A cross-thematic curriculum framework for compulsory education. Available via Accessed 26 May 2008
  11. Hudson L (1974) Contrary imaginations. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  12. Kallery M, Psillos D, Tselfes V (2007) Typical didactical activities in the Greek early-years science classroom: do they promote science learning? Int J Sci Educ. Available via Accessed 26 May 2008
  13. Klein P (2006) The challenges of scientific literacy: from the viewpoint of second-generation cognitive science. Int J Sci Educ 28:143–178. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McManus I, Furnham A (2006) Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts. Br J Psychol 97:555–587. doi: 10.1348/000712606X101088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Millar R, Osborne J (1998) Beyond 2000: science education for the future. King’s College London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Norris S, Guilbert S, Smith M, Hakimelahi L, Phillips L (2005) A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Sci Educ 89:535–563. doi: 10.1002/sce.20063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ochs E, Capps L (2001) Living narrative: creating lives in everyday storytelling. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Pantidos P, Stathi K, Vitoratos E (2001) The use of drama in science education: the case of “Blegdamsvej Faust”. Sci & Educ 10:107–117. doi: 10.1023/A:1008769401292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paroussi A, Tselfes V (2006) Crossing the borders between science and shadow theatre: the case of light (part I). In: Govas N, Choleva N (eds) Theatre/drama & education: creating new roles for 21st century. Proceedings of the 5th Athens international theater and drama education conference. Hellenic Theatre/Drama Education Network, Athens, pp 119–128Google Scholar
  20. Paroussi A, Tselfes V (2007) Crossing the borders between science and shadow theatre: the case of light (part II). Paper presented in the IDEA World Congress, Honk Kong 2007, planting human ideas: global vision in local knowledge (to be published in the proceedings)Google Scholar
  21. Paroussi A, Tselfes V (2008) Early childhood education student teachers cross the cultural borders between science and shadow theatre: a case study of pedagogical content knowledge’ development. Arch Int Hist Sci (Paris) (to be published)Google Scholar
  22. Peirce C (1964) Collected papers. In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P (eds) Belkan Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Simona S, Naylorb S, Keoghb B, Maloneya J, Downing B (2007) Puppets promoting engagement and talk in science. International Journal of Science Education. Available via 1–20, Accessed 26 May 2008
  24. Snow C (1964) The two cultures and a second look. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Souriau E (1950) Les deux cent mille situations dramatiques. Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Tillis S (1992) Toward an aesthetics of the puppet. Greenwood Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Willett J, Manheim R (1995) Brecht, collected plays: five, life of galileo, mother courage and her children. Translation: Willett J. Methuen Drama, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Yore L, Treagust D (2006) Current realities and future possibilities: language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction. Int J Sci Educ 28:291–314. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yore L, Bisanz G, Hand B (2003) Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. Int J Sci Educ 25:689–725. doi: 10.1080/09500690305018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yore L, Pimm D, Tuan H-L (2007) The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. Int J Sci Math Educ 5:559–589. doi: 10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Early Childhood EducationUniversity of AthensAthensEurope

Personalised recommendations