Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financing constraints and SME growth: the suppression effect of cost-saving management innovations

  • Research article
  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A constrained access to external financing has a negative effect on firm growth. This is even more problematic for SMEs, as smaller firms are more prone to having financing constraints. Drawing on the resource dependence theory, we argue that firms with constrained access to external financing seek to become less dependent on their access to external financing. Firms can introduce cost-saving management innovations, which are innovations in the form of new organizational processes, practices and structures with the goal of reducing the firm’s costs and increasing its efficiency. Relying on survey data of 2,973 observations of SMEs among 34 European countries, our results show that SMEs with constrained access to external financing are indeed more likely to introduce such cost-saving management innovations. We also find evidence that cost-saving management innovations positively affect firm growth. Hence, we find a positive indirect effect of constrained access to external financing on SME revenue growth through cost-saving management innovations. This positive indirect effect suppresses the negative direct effect of constrained access to financing on revenue growth, pointing to a potentially important role of cost-saving management innovations as a coping strategy for constrained access to external financing for SMEs.

Plain English Summary

Although constrained access to external financing is a well-known barrier to innovation and growth, we find that constrained access to external financing induces cost-saving management innovations that subsequently stimulate SME growth. SMEs seek to reduce their dependence on external capital when they hold no power over external capital providers. Among our sample of 2,973 observations of European SMEs, a quarter of SMEs introduced cost-saving management innovations, which increased to one-third if the firm perceived its access to external financing as its most important problem. These innovations consequently increased revenue growth and suppressed the negative effect of a constrained access to external financing on growth. This is an important insight for managers in SMEs who seek to stimulate firm growth even when dealing with financing constraints. Policymakers may note that not all SMEs are affected equally negative by financing constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The following industries are excluded (NaceRev 2 industry classification): agriculture, forestry and fishing (A), financial and insurance activities (K), public administration and defense, compulsory social security (O), education (P), human health and social work activities (Q), activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods- and services-producing activities of households for own use (T), activities of extra-territorial organizations and bodies (U), holding companies (NACE 64.20) and private non-profit institutions.

  2. Our data does not allow to make a distinction based on total assets.

  3. More detailed information about SAFE, and the possibility to request the data, is available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/ecb_surveys/safe/html/index.en.html#dd (Opened on March 23, 2023).

  4. There were no observations of firms in Bosnia & Herzegovina or Kosovo. The distribution of the sample among the different countries is displayed in Table 8 in the Appendix.

  5. We use the STATA khb command as developed by Karlson et al. (2012).

References

Download references

Funding

This research received funding as a project of Strategic Basic Research (SBO) of the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) (S002919N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tristan De Blick.

Ethics declarations

Declaration of interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 8, 9, 10 and 11

Table 8 Number of observations at time of CATEF surveyed per country and wave
Table 9 Correlation matrix
Table 10 Effects of different measure of CATEF
Table 11 KHB decomposition of total effect into direct and indirect effect using different measure of CATEF

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Blick, T., Paeleman, I. & Laveren, E. Financing constraints and SME growth: the suppression effect of cost-saving management innovations. Small Bus Econ 62, 961–986 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00797-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00797-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation