Contextualisation research in entrepreneurship is on the rise. Scholars generally view it positively, as contextualisation allows for a better understanding of the bigger picture, whilst also concerns are voiced. However, contextualisation may lead to an overly fragmented field and its possible disintegration. This calls for ‘the emergence of sensible approaches to contextualisation that provide guidance in balancing its benefits and costs’ as reported by Welter et al. (Small Business Economics 52(2):319–330, 2019) which is the challenge we address in this Special Issue. More specifically, we argue that an investigation of the construction and enactment of contexts provides a path to better understand the identified tension. The aim of this Special Issue ties in with increasing calls in the entrepreneurship literature for going beyond agent centric views towards accounts that theorise the interconnections between agency and structure. Taken together, the articles in this special issue contribute to (1) a stronger grounding for entrepreneurship theories and concepts; (2) a more balanced conceptualisation of both agency and context; (3) a shift from the ‘standard model’ of entrepreneurship; and (4) context sensitive entrepreneurship methodologies and approaches. We end with identifying further research avenues.
Plain English Summary
Contextualisation research in entrepreneurship is on the rise. With contextualisation we aim to understand the external environmental factors impacting entrepreneurial activities. Many scholars believe it provides a better understanding of the bigger picture, whereby others highlight that contextualisation may lead to an overly fragmented field and its possible disintegration. In this Special Issue, we argue that by investigating ‘doing contexts’, which are the making, unmaking, and remaking of sites for entrepreneurial action, we help to tackle this challenge. Taken together, the articles of this Special Issue contribute to (1) a stronger grounding for entrepreneurship theories and concepts; (2) a more balanced conceptualisation of both agency and context; (3) a shift from the ‘standard model’ of entrepreneurship; and (4) context sensitive entrepreneurship methodologies and approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alshareef, S. (2022). Does location matter? Unpacking the dynamic relationship between the spatial context and embeddedness in women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34(3-4), 294–318.
Angulo-Guerrero, M. J., Bárcena-Martin, E., Medina-Claros, S., & Pérez-Moreno, S. (2023). Labor market regulation and gendered entrepreneurship: A cross-national perspective. Small Business Economics.
Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Cherkas, N. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: The role of institutions. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0247609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247609
Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2017). Come on out of the ghetto, please! – Building the future of entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2016-0065
Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2018). Contextual entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary perspective. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 14(4), 357–426. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000078
Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2020). Contextualizing entrepreneurship theory. Routledge.
Bamberger, P. (2008). From the editors beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.34789630
Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. (2016). Understanding entrepreneurial cognitions through the lenses of context. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda on entrepreneurship and context (pp. 16–27). Edward Elgar.
Bruton, G. D., Zahra, S. A., & Cai, L. (2018). Examining entrepreneurship through indigenous lenses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717741129
Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00013-8
Champenois, C., Lefebvre, V., & Ronteau, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship as practice: Systematic literature review of a nascent field. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(3-4), 281–312.
Chlosta, S. (2016). Methodological approaches towards context-sensitive entrepreneurship research. In A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 109–119). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014
Coviello, N. E., & Jones, M. V. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.06.001
Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25(4), 81–99.
Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001–1022.
Essers, C., Dey, P., Tedmanson, D., & Verduyn, K. (2017). Critical entrepreneurship studies: A manifesto. In Critical perspectives on entrepreneurship (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
Fletcher, D., & Selden, P. (2016). A relational conceptualization of context and the real-time emergence of entrepreneurship processes. In F. Welter & W. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Furnari, S. (2014). Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0045
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2014). Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43(7), 1177–1188.
Giele, J. Z., & Elder, G. H. (Eds.). (1998). Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.
Hadjielias, E., Christofi, M., & Tarba, S. (2022). Contextualizing small business resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from small business owner-managers. Small Business Economics, 59(4), 1351–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00588-0
Harima, A., Harima, J., & Freiling, J. (2021). The injection of resources by transnational entrepreneurs: Towards a model of the early evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 33(1-2), 80–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1734265
Henry, C., & Lewis, K. V. (2023). The art of dramatic construction: Enhancing the context dimension in women’s entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113440.
Ho, M., & Teo, S. T. T. (2022). Activating collective agency in disrupted contexts: The social-cognitive context of ad hoc organising in a small and medium-sized enterprise. International Small Business Journal, 40(2), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211049503
Howell, T. (2022). Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda. Research Policy, 51(2), 104447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104447
Hughes, K. D., & Jennings, J. E. (2020). A legacy of attention to embeddedness in gendered institutions: Reflections on a key contribution of women’s entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship.
Imas, J. M., Wilson, N., & Weston, A. (2012). Barefoot entrepreneurs. Organization, 19(5), 563–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412459996
Kašperová, E., & Kitching, J. (2014). Embodying entrepreneurial identity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(5), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2013-0108
Kibler, E., Fink, M., Lang, R., & Muñoz, P. (2015). Place attachment and social legitimacy: Revisiting the sustainable entrepreneurship journey. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 3, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2015.04.001
Korsgaard, S., Wigren-Kristoferson, C., Brundin, E., Hellerstedt, K., Alsos, G. A., & Grande, J. (2022). Entrepreneurship and embeddedness: Process, context and theoretical foundations. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34(3-4), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2055152
Lang, R., Fink, M., & Kibler, E. (2014, Mar). Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: A comparative institutional analysis. International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship, 32(2), 204–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613488614
Lassalle, P., & McElwee, G. (2016). Polish entrepreneurs in Glasgow and entrepreneurial opportunity structure. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2016-0012
Lee, C. K., Wiklund, J., Amezcua, A., Bae, T. J., & Palubinskas, A. (2022). Business failure and institutions in entrepreneurship: A systematic review and research agenda. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 1997–2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00495-4
Lippmann, S., & Aldrich, H. E. (2016). The temporal dimension of context. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Martinez Dy, A., & Jayawarna, D. (2020). Bios, mythoi and women entrepreneurs: A Wynterian analysis of the intersectional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-employed women and women-owned businesses. International Small Business Journal, 38(5), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242620939935
Martinez Dy, A., Marlow, S., & Martin, L. (2017). A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. Human Relations, 70(3), 286–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716650730
McMullen, J. S., Ingram, K. M., & Adams, J. (2020). What makes an entrepreneurship study entrepreneurial? Toward a unified theory of entrepreneurial agency. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45, 1042258720922460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720922460
Morales, C., Holtschlag, C., Masuda, A. D., & Marquina, P. (2019). In which cultural contexts do individual values explain entrepreneurship? An integrative values framework using Schwartz’s theories. International Small Business Journal, 37(3), 241–267.
Müller, S., & Korsgaard, S. (2018). Resources and bridging: The role of spatial context in rural entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(1-2), 224–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1402092
Muñoz, P., Kimmitt, J., & Spigel, B. (2023). Trans-contextual work: Doing entrepreneurial contexts in the periphery. Small Business Economics.
Nakara, W. A., Messeghem, K., & Ramaroson, A. (2019). Innovation and entrepreneurship in a context of poverty: A multilevel approach. Small Business Economics, 56(4), 1601–1617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00281-3
Niemi, L., Stenholm, P., Hakala, H., & Kantola, J. (2022). Immanent sensemaking by entrepreneurs and the interpretation of consumer context. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 40(8), 966–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211061531
Ozasir Kacar, S. (2023). Making, unmaking and remaking of context in entrepreneurial identity construction and experiences: A comparative analysis between Turkiye and the Netherlands. Small Business Economics.
Pathak, S., & Muralidharan, E. (2023). Contextualizing emotional intelligence for commercial and social entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics.
Redhead, G., & Bika, Z. (2022). ‘Adopting place’: How an entrepreneurial sense of belonging can help revitalise communities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2049375
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196
Shaw, E., Wilson, J., & Pret, T. (2017). The process of embedding a small firm in its industrial context. International Small Business Journal, 35(3), 219–243.
Shirokova, G., Beliaeva, T., & Manolova, T. S. (2022). The role of context for theory development: Evidence from entrepreneurship research on Russia. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 10422587221138226.
Stam, E., & van de Ven, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
Stam, E., & Welter, F. (2020). Spaces, places and entrepreneurial agency. The psychology of entrepreneurship: New perspectives. Routledge.
Steyaert, C. (2016). ‘After’context. In A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 28–40). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5
Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., Özbilgin, M., Forson, C., & Slutskaya, N. (2014). A Bourdieuan relational perspective for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12122
Theodoraki, C., & Catanzaro, A. (2021). Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09852-7
Thompson, N. A., Verduijn, K., & Gartner, W. B. (2020). Entrepreneurship-as-practice: Grounding contemporary theories of practice into entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(3–4), 247–256
Thornton, P. H., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity:An overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391930
Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2014). Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: An international study. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 703–716.
Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53(1), 21–49.
Urbano, D., Turro, A., Wright, M., & Zahra, S. (2022). Corporate entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Small Business Economics, 59(4), 1541–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00590-6
van Erkelens, A. M., Thompson, N. A., & Chalmers, D. (2023). The dynamic construction of an incubation context: A practice theory perspective. Small Business Economics.
Verver, M., & Koning, J. (2023). An anthropological perspective on contextualizing entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics.
Wadhwani, R. D., Kirsch, D., Welter, F., Gartner, W. B., & Jones, G. G. (2020). Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(1), 3–19.
Webb, J. W., Khoury, T. A., & Hitt, M. A. (2020). The influence of formal and informal institutional voids on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719830310
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
Welter, F., & Baker, T. (2021). Moving contexts onto new roads: Clues from other disciplines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1154–1175.
Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—A call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12258
Welter, F., Baker, T., & Wirsching, K. (2019). Three waves and counting: The rising tide of contextualization in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0094-5
Welter, F., & Gartner, W. B. (2016). Advancing our research agenda for entrepreneurship and contexts. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 156–160). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x
Welter, F., & Xheneti, M. (2015). Value for whom? Exploring the value of informal entrepreneurial activities in post-socialist contexts. In Exploring criminal and illegal enterprise: new perspectives on research, policy & practice (Vol. 5, pp. 253–275). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-724620150000005016
Wigren-Kristoferson, C., Brundin, E., Hellerstedt, K., Stevenson, A., & Aggestam, M. (2022). Rethinking embeddedness: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34(1-2), 32–56.
Williams, N., & Vorley, T. (2017). Fostering productive entrepreneurship in post-conflict economies: The importance of institutional alignment. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(5-6), 444–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1297853
Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735
Zahra, S. A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.007
Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s Next Act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.0149
Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479–500.
David Urbano acknowledges the financial support from the projects ECO2017-87885-P (Spanish Ministry of Economy & Competitiveness) and 2017-SGR-1056 (Economy & Knowledge Department, Catalan Government), and ICREA under ICREA Academia programme.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ben-Hafaïedh, C., Xheneti, M., Stenholm, P. et al. The interplay of context and entrepreneurship: the new frontier for contextualisation research. Small Bus Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00770-6