Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Segmenting “digital investors”: evidence from the Italian equity crowdfunding market

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The financial market despite being hit by the digital revolution has only recently reached the segment of direct investments on the part of non-professional investors in new ventures. Through equity crowdfunding platforms, in particular, capital demand and supply for startups are easily linked, thus bringing thousands of new investors to the financial market. This study examines equity crowdfunding investor drivers when selecting investment proposals. Specifically, we segment the Italian equity crowdfunding investors’ market by means of a cluster analysis and explore differences between segments in terms of socio-demographic and behavioral variables. Based on previous studies, six drivers (pertaining to three macro dimensions) were chosen for the segmentation of equity crowdfunding investors: confidence in team, confidence in venture, financial pledge and project attractiveness, platform characteristics, community driver, societal driver. The cluster analysis yielded four clusters we labeled: (1) venture trustful; (2) crowdfunding technicians; (3) financial investors, talent scouters; (4) social dreamers. In order to further specify the profile of the four clusters, each one was cross-tabulated with external variables of crowdfunding investors’ socio-economic characteristics and behavioral variables. Understanding, by means of a fine-grain lens, the differences between these new digital investors offers practical insights for crowd-equity platform management or for would-be entrepreneurs seeking funds. Finally, implications on future research streams on crowdfunding are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data on EC market in Italy can be found on crowdfundingbuzz.it. We sincerely thank Dr. Fabio Allegreni for his kind cooperation. We also thank Tommaso d’Onofrio of Action Crowd for his valuable support.

  2. CONSOB: “Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa” is the entity entitled to observe and rule the exchange, similar to the Security Exchange Commission.

  3. The list with the operationalization of all variables used in the study is available upon request from the authors.

References

  • Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding (no. w16820). National bureau of economic research.

  • Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banhatti, R. D. (2016). Crowdfunding of a social enterprise: The GloW project as a case study. Crowdfunding in Europe (pp. 223–239). Springer International Publishing.

  • Baty, H. F. (1964). American education in international development. The Journal of Higher Education, 35(8), 474–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 411–436.

  • Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6), 613–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoni, F., Colombo, M., & Quas, A. (2015). The patterns of venture capital investment in Europe. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 543–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H., Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. (2018). New players in entrepreneurial finance and why are there. Small Business Economics, 50, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, A. V., & Tyebjee, T. T. (1985). The entrepreneur’s search for capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüntje, D., & Gajda, O. (2016). Crowdfunding in Europe. state of the art in theory and practice. Bern: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D., & Timmons, J. (1992). Venture capital at the crossroads. Boston: Harvard business school press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Alternative Finance. (2016). Sustaining momentum. The 2nd European Alternative Finance Industry Report. Judge Business School: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cholakova, M., & Clarysse, B. (2015). Does the possibility to make equity investments in crowdfunding projects crowd out reward-based investments? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 145–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The determinants of new venture performance: An extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosh, A., Cumming, D., & Hughes, A. (2009). Outside enterpreneurial capital. The Economic Journal, 119(October), 1494–1533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding models: Keep-it-all vs. all-or-nothing. In Finance meeting EUROFIDAI, Paris, December 2014, AFFI paper (Vol. 10).

  • Davies, R. (2014). Civic crowdfunding: Participatory communities, entrepreneurs and the political economy of place. Cambridge: MIT Masters Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Buysere, K., Gajda, O., Kleverlaan, R., Marom, D., & Klaes, M. (2012). A framework for European crowdfunding. European Crowdfunding Network.

  • Dhochak, M., & Sharma, A. K. (2016). Identification and prioritization of factors affecting venture capitalists’ investment decision-making process: An analytical hierarchal process (AHP) approach. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(4), 964–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method (Vol. 19). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dushnitsky, G., Guerini, M., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2016). Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of platform creation across countries. California Management Review, 58(2), Winter), 44–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., & Khavul, S. (2016). Equity crowdfunding: a new model for financing entrepreneurship? CentrePiece (pp. 6–9). London: CEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feola, R., Parente, R., D’Onofrio, T., Marinato, E., & Pellegrino, D. (2017). The evolution of crowdfunding towards an impact investing logic: The case of Paulownia social project. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 13(1), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, J. (2005). Is venture capital worth it? Effects on firm performance and founder returns. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23(3), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T., & Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 16(3), 247–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, G., Guerini, M., & Rossi Lamastra, C. (2013). Why crowdfunding projects can succeed: The role of proponents’ individual and territorial social capital. SSRN Working Paer N. 2255944.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (Sevent ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., & Hofer, C. W. (1993). Venture capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). On the fundamental role of venture capital. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 87(4), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D., & Jankowicz, A. D. (1990). Intuition in venture capital decisions: An exploratory study using a new technique. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoenen, S., Kolympiris, C., Schoenmakers, W., & Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2014). The diminishing signaling value of patents between early rounds of venture capital financing. Research Policy, 43(6), 956–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoening, D., & Henkel, J. (2015). Quality signals? The role of patents, alliances, and team experience in venture capital financing. Research Policy, 44(5), 1049–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A. O., & Broekhuizen, T. L. (2010). Understanding investors’ decisions to purchase innovative products: Drivers of adoption timing and range. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 342–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornuf, L., & Schwienbacher, A. (2018). Market mechanisms and funding dynamics in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 556–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., & Oparaocha, G. O. (2017). Crowdfunding: Motives, definitions, typology and ethical challenges. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14(6), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy, 36(5), 722–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-C., El Tarabishy, A., & Bae, Z.-T. (2018). Humane entrepreneurship: Focusing on people drive new era of wealth and quality job creation in a sustainable world. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(S1), 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirilova, P. K. (2016). Impact of debt crowdfunding for civic projects on the optimal portfolio of a socially responsible investor. In Crowdfunding in Europe (pp. 167–173). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleemann, F., Voß, G. G., & Rieder, K. (2008). Un (der) paid innovators: The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science Technology & Innovation Studies, 4(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knockaert, M., Clarysse, B., & Wright, M. (2010). The extent and nature of heterogeneity of venture capital selection behaviour in new technology-based firms. R&D Management, 40(4), 357–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2015). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2234765; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2234765.

  • Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network, Working Paper n. 1578175, 1–23.

  • Lattin, J. M., Carroll, J. D., & Green, P. E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. Pacific Grove: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubacher, R. (2012). Entrepreneurship and venture capital in the age of collective intelligence, MIT Center for Collective Intelligence Working Paper No. 2012-02.

  • Löher, J. (2017). The interaction of equity crowdfunding platforms and ventures: An analysis of the preselection process. Venture Capital, 19(1–2), 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87, 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I. C., Siegel, R., & Narasimha, P. S. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlett, D. (2015). Crowdfunding art, science and technology. A quick survey of the burgeoning new landscape. Leonardo, 48(1), 104–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M. G. (2017). Inspiring crowdsourcing communities to create novel solutions: Competition design and the mediating role of trust. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 296–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massolution (2012). Crowdfunding industry report market trends. Composition and Crowdfunding Platforms.

  • Massolution (2015). CF: The crowdfunding industry report.

  • Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. L., Westley, F. R., & Nicholls, A. (2012). The social finance and social innovation nexus. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, A., & Block, J. H. (2016). Crowdfunding: A literature review and research directions. In Crowdfunding in Europe (pp. 25–53). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation, innovations: Technology, governance, globalization. MIT Press.

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Murphy, P. E., & Gruber, V. (2014). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd-funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, V., Faris, J., & Srivastava, S. (2015). Crowdfunding 2.0: The next-generation philanthropy. EMBO Reports, 16(3), 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parente, R., Vesci, M., Botti, A., & El Tarabishy, A. (2018). The epistemology of humane entrepreneurship: Theory and proposal for future research agenda. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(S1), 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Davis, J. L., Moore, C. B., & Bell, R. G. (2009). The deal structuring stage of the venture capitalist decision-making process: Exploring confidence and control. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(2), 154–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., Moeslein, K., & Stotko, C. M. (2004). Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration. Production planning & control, 15(4), 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politecnico di Milano (2017). Osservatorio CrowdFunding, 2° Report Italiano Sul Crowdinvesting.

  • Puaschunder, J. M. (2017). Socio-psychological motives of socially responsible investors. Global Corporate Governance, 19, 209–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 846–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risterucci, F. (2016). The ten commandments of crowdfunding. In Crowdfunding in Europe (pp. 241–248). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J., Korsgaard, M. A., & Forbes, D. P. (2003). The self-determination motive and entrepreneurs’ choice of financing. In A. K. Jerome & D. A. Shepherd (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research (Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, Volume 6) (pp. 105–138). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2010). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signori, A., & Vismara, S. (2018). Does success bring success? The post offering lives of equity crowdfunding firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 575–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Mathers, A., & Crooks, V. A. (2016). Fund my treatment!: A call for ethics-focused social science research into the use of crowdfunding for medical care. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technavio (2016). Global crowdfunding market 2016–2020.

  • Timmons, J. A., & Sapienza, H. J. (1992). Venture capital: The decade ahead. In D. L. Sexton & J. D. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art of entrepreneurship (pp. 402–437). Boston: PWSKENT Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torkanovskiy, E. (2016). Non-equity crowdfunding as a National Phenomenon in a global industry: The case of Russia. In Crowdfunding in Europe (pp. 115–123). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanacker, T. R., & Manigart, S. (2010). Pecking order and debt capacity considerations for high growth companies seeking financing. Small Business Economics, 35(1), 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vismara, S. (2016a). Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 46, 579–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vismara, S. (2016b). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 467–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vulkan, N., Astebro, T. B., & Sierra, M. F. (2016). Equity crowdfunding: A new phenomena. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walthoff-Borm, X., Schwienbacher, A., & Vanacker, T. (2018). Equity crowdfunding: First resort or last resort? Journal of Business Venturing, 33, 513–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, W. E. (1983). Angels and informal risk capital. Sloan Management Review, 24(4), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, W. E., & Seymour, C. R. (1981). Informal risk capital in New England: Report and survey results. University of New Hampshire.

  • Wheat, R. E., Wang, Y., Byrnes, J. E., & Ranganathan, J. (2013). Raising money for scientific research through crowdfunding. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(2), 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Jun, M., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Measuring customer perceived online service quality: Scale development and managerial implications. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(11), 1149–1174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084, Fisciano, SA, Italy

    Rosangela Feola, Massimiliano Vesci, Ezio Marinato & Roberto Parente

Authors
  1. Rosangela Feola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimiliano Vesci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ezio Marinato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberto Parente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosangela Feola.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feola, R., Vesci, M., Marinato, E. et al. Segmenting “digital investors”: evidence from the Italian equity crowdfunding market. Small Bus Econ 56, 1235–1250 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00265-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00265-3

Keywords

JEL

Search

Navigation