Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship ecosystems and women entrepreneurs: a social capital and network approach

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of venture typology, race, ethnicity, and past venture experience on the social capital distribution of women entrepreneurs in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Social network data from two municipal ecosystems in Florida, USA (Gainesville and Jacksonville), suggest that network connectivity and the distribution of social capital are significantly different for men and women entrepreneurs. This difference is contingent on the venture type. Male entrepreneurs show higher comparative scores of bridging social capital in aggressive- and managed-growth venture networks, while women entrepreneurs surpass their male counterparts’ bridging capital scores in lifestyle and survival venture networks. Lastly, experienced women entrepreneurs that self-identified as white showed a higher degree of network connectivity and bridging social capital in the entrepreneurial ecosystem than less experienced non-white female entrepreneurs. Implications for entrepreneurship practice and new research paths are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

  7. Anderson, A. R., & Jack, S. L. (2002). The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: a glue or a lubricant? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(3), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (2000). Beyond social capital: how social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, M. C. (2001). The role of routines in organizations: an empirical and taxonomic investigation. University of Cambridge.

  11. Bell, S. J., Tracey, P., & Heide, J. B. (2009). The organization of regional clusters. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 623–642.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berg, S. (1988). Snowball sampling. In S. Kotz & N. I. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bliemel, M. J., McCarthy, I. P., & Maine, E. M. A. (2015). Levels of multiplexity in entrepreneur’s networks: implications for dynamism and value creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 0(0).

  14. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & De Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23(3), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.

  18. Brooks, A. W., Huang, L., Kearney, S. W., & Murray, F. E. (2014). Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12), 4427–4431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brush, C. G., & Chaganti, R. (1999). Businesses without glamour? An analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brush, C. G., De Bruin, A., & Welter, F. (2009). A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brush, C. G., Carter, N. M., Gatewood, E., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2004). Clearing the hurdles: women building high-growth businesses. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Calas, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the boundaries: reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carter, N., Brush, C., Greene, P., Gatewood, E., & Hart, M. (2003). Women entrepreneurs who break through to equity financing: the influence of human, social and financial capital. Venture Capital: an International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 5(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Colombo, M. G., Franzoni, C., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cope, J., Jack, S., & Rose, M. B. (2007). Social capital and entrepreneurship: an introduction. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Carolis, D. M., Litzky, B. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: the influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: a theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5), 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Edelman, L. F., Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Greene, P. G. (2010). Start-up motivations and growth intentions of minority nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fabowale, L., Orser, B., & Riding, A. (1995). Gender, structural factors, and credit terms between Canadian small businesses and financial institutions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 19(4), 41–66.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken: Wiley.

  35. Florin, J., Lubatkin, M., & Schulze, W. (2003). A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 374–384.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Foster, G., Shimizu, C., Ciesinski, S., Davila, A., Hassan, S., Jia, N., & Morris, R. (2013). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics. In World Economic Forum (Vol. 11).

  37. Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), 1717–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Greene, P. G., Brush, C. G., Hart, M. M., & Saparito, P. (2001). Patterns of venture capital funding: is gender a factor? Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 3(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Grossman, E. B., Yli-Renko, H., & Janakiraman, R. (2012). Resource search, interpersonal similarity, and network tie valuation in nascent entrepreneurs’ emerging networks. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1760–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Heckathorn, D. D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jack, S. L. (2005). The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: a qualitative analysis*. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1233–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2008). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, 216, 239.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kuratko, D. F. (2016). Different entrepreneurial ventures for greater societal value: a portfolio approach to assist public policy. The Antitrust Bulletin, 61(4), 546–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology, 4(1), 455–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lechner, C., Frankenberger, K., & Floyd, S. W. (2010). Task contingencies in the curvilinear relationships between intergroup networks and initiative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 865–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Light, I. (2010). The religious ethic of the Protestant ethnics. In L.-P. Dana (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and religion (pp. 168–183). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Light, I., & Dana, L.-P. (2013). Boundaries of social capital in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Locke, E. A., Noorderhaven, N. G., Cannon, J. P., Doney, P. M., & Mullen, M. R. (1999). Some reservations about social capital. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Malecki, E. J. (1997). Entrepreneurs, networks, and economic development: a review of recent research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3, 57–118.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Manolova, T. S. (2006). Builders and leaders: six case studies of men and women small proprietors in the Bulgarian construction industry. In Growth-oriented women entrepreneurs and their businesses: a global research perspective (p. 232).

  58. Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2013). Gender and entrepreneurship: advancing debate and challenging myths; exploring the mystery of the under-performing female entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 19(1), 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. McGowan, P., & Hampton, A. (2007). An exploration of networking practices of female entrepreneurs. In Female entrepreneurship: implications for education, training and policy (pp. 110–134). New York: Routledge.

  62. McKeown, T. J. (2001). Plans and routines, bureaucratic bargaining, and the Cuban missile crisis. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1163–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1993). Mechanisms of change in urban dialects: the role of class, social network and gender. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Min, P. G., Waldinger, R., Aldrich, H., & Ward, R. (1993). Ethnic entrepreneurs: immigrant business in industrial societies. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Moliterno, T. P., & Mahony, D. M. (2011). Network theory of organization: a multilevel approach. Journal of Management, 37(2), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., Schindehutte, M., & Spivack, A. J. (2012). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Morris, M. H., Neumeyer, X., Jang, Y., & Kuratko, D. F. (2016). Distinguishing types of entrepreneurial ventures: an identity-based perspective. Journal of Small Business Management.

  69. Morris, M. H., Neumeyer, X., & Kuratko, D. F. (2015). A portfolio perspective on entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 713–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Neergaard, H., Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2005). The impact of gender, social capital and networks on business ownership: a research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 11(5), 338–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Nikolova, M. (1993). Nyakoi demografski spekti na jenskoto predpriemachestvo (Some demographic aspects of women’s entrepreneurship). Problemi na truda, 9, 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics (pp. 223–234). Springer.

  74. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. Accessed 14 July 2017.

  75. Robinson, J., Blockson, L., & Robinson, S. (2007). Exploring stratification and entrepreneurship: African American women entrepreneurs redefine success in growth ventures. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 613(1), 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ruef, M. (2002). Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 193–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Shane, S. A. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 49–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 152–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2010). Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: a cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1347–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Welter, F., Smallbone, D., Isakova, N., Aculai, E., & Schakirova, N. (2004). Women’s entrepreneurship in Ukraine, Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan: results of a comparative study. In Access to financing and ITC for women entrepreneurs in the UNECE region: challenges and good practices (pp. 39–52). Geneva: United Nations.

  88. Westlund, H., & Bolton, R. (2003). Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 77–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Whittington, K. B., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 90–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Yang, F., Duan, P., Shah, S. L., & Chen, T. (2014). Capturing connectivity and causality in complex industrial processes. Springer Science & Business Media.

  91. Yetim, N. (2008). Social capital in female entrepreneurship. International Sociology, 23(6), 864–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jamie Kraft and Dr. Michael Morris at the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Center at the University of Florida for helpful feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript and access to stakeholders in the municipal entrepreneurship ecosystems that we selected for our study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xaver Neumeyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neumeyer, X., Santos, S.C., Caetano, A. et al. Entrepreneurship ecosystems and women entrepreneurs: a social capital and network approach. Small Bus Econ 53, 475–489 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9996-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Women entrepreneurs
  • Entrepreneurial ecosystems
  • Social capital
  • Boundary conditions of social capital
  • Network analysis

JEL classification

  • L26
  • L25