The role of industry variety in the creation of innovative start-ups in Italy
This paper aims to ascertain whether related and unrelated industry variety affects the creation of innovative as opposed to other start-ups in Italian local labor market areas. The analysis combines elements from the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, the recombinant growth approach, and evolutionary economic geography. Using data on Italian innovative start-ups created between 2012 and 2015, and on firms newly registered with the Italian Chambers of Commerce, and applying appropriate count data models, our estimates show that innovative start-ups are more frequently created in areas where unrelated variety is higher. This is because innovative start-ups find more opportunities to recombine different pieces of knowledge or maximize their portfolio of demand opportunities, in such a setting, whereas a higher related variety stimulates the creation of other types of new start-up, for which it is easier to combine similar, complementary knowledge sources. We also find that half of the effect of related and unrelated variety comes from the localization of (innovative) start-ups in large urban areas.
KeywordsNew start-ups Innovative start-ups Related variety Unrelated variety
JEL classificationL26 M13 R11 O33
The authors thank the editors of the special issue and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments to previous versions of the manuscript. The authors also thank ISTAT for data provision, in particular, Sandro Cruciani, for his suggestions on the creation of the dataset, and participants to the XX Uddevalla Symposium and the XXXVIII AISRE annual conference for their comments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. J. (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79(4), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.2000.tb01766.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 96(3), 630–640.Google Scholar
- Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2014). The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9536-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Colombelli, A., & Quatraro, F. (2017). Green start-ups and local knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies, Small Business Economics, Online First, 1–20, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9934-y.
- Frenken, K., van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth, Regional Studies, 418(5), 685–697, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296.
- Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 1033–1082). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.Google Scholar
- Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2014). Agents of structural change. The role of firms and entrepreneurs on regional diversification. In Papers in evolutionary economic geography (Vol. 14/10). Utrecht University Section of Economic Geography.Google Scholar