Effects of federal socioeconomic contracting preferences
The 8(a) business development program supports small disadvantaged U.S. federal contractors through benefits such as set-aside and sole-source contracts, management and technical assistance, and mentor-protégé relationships with established firms. This study examines the effectiveness of the 8(a) program at producing positive firm-level outcomes by comparing 8(a) firms with those participating in other preferential contracting programs with different benefits. The average 8(a) program participant performs well relative to baseline firms that do not receive contracting preferences; however, these effects are driven directly by funding and not by broader stimulation of sound business practices as intended by program designers. Program participants perform similarly to service-disabled veteran-owned businesses, which benefit from comparable contract preferences but none of the mentorship, administrative support and management assistance offered to 8(a) firms. While growing at similar rates, 8(a) firms are substantially more likely to go out of business than firms in this comparison group.
KeywordsEntrepreneurship Firm sales Firm size National subsidies Policy Public economics Public expenditure
JEL classificationH32 H57 L25 L53
Funding was provided by the Center for Study of Public Choice at George Mason University and the Cosmos Club Foundation. Thanks to Alex Tabarrok, Thomas Stratmann and John Earle of George Mason University.
- Abadie A., & Imbens, G. (2012). Matching on the estimated propensity score. NBER Working Paper, 15301. doi: 10.3386/w15301.
- Anglund, S. M. (2000). Small business policy and the American creed. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Ashenfelter, O., & Heckman, J. (1976). Measuring the effect of an antidiscrimination program. In Ashenfeter & Blum (Eds.), Evaluating the labor-market effects of social programs (pp. 46–89). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bates, T. 2004. “Minority business development programs: Failure by design.” in Race, poverty, and domestic policy, by C.M. Henry. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Cox, A. G., & Moore, N. Y. (2013). Improving federal and Department of Defense use of service-disabled veteran-owned businesses. Washington, DC: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Enchautegui, M., Fix, M., Loprest, P., von der Lippe, S., & Wissoker, D. (1996). Do minority-owned businesses get a fair share of government contracts? Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Fairlie, R. W., & Robb, A. M. (2008). Race and entrepreneurial success: Black-, Asian-, and White-owned businesses in the United States. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Leiter, S., & Leiter, W. (2002). Affirmative action in antidiscrimination law and policy: an overview and synthesis. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- McVay, B. L. (2009). Getting started in Federal Contracting: a guide through the Federal Procurement Maze. Burke: Panoptic Enterprises.Google Scholar
- Myers Jr., S. L., & Chan, T. (1996). Who benefits from minority business set-asides? The case of New Jersey. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(2), 202–226. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199621)15:2<202::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Myers, S.L., & Yuan, G. (2013) The deterrent effects of reverse discrimination claims on federal rule compliance: The case of public procurement and contracting. APPAM International Conference, Fudan University, May 25–27, 2013. http://www.umdcipe.org/conferences/GovernmentCollaborationShanghai/ShanghaiAgenda.html
- Reeder, J.R., & Vergilio, J.A. (1984). Small business set-asides and corporate affiliation – A billion dollar business. Public Contract Law Journal, 15(2), 279–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25755477
- Sirmons, D.B. (2004). Federal contracting with women-owned businesses: An analysis of existing challenges and potential opportunities. Public Contract Law Journal, 33(4), 725–779. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25755295
- Strupler, M.L.,& Wolter, S.C. (2016). Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of social public procurement policy: The case of the swiss apprenticeship training system. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9646. http://legacy.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_id=9646