You can lead a firm to R&D but can you make it innovate? UK evidence from SMEs

Abstract

The UK Government introduced tax credits for SMEs to promote and support R&D in 2000. Since then the policy has become more generous in this respect, particularly since 2008. In this paper, we use the National Systems of Entrepreneurship as a conceptual framework in which to question whether SMEs take-up of tax credits has actually led to an increase in product, service, or process innovations. Our evidence suggests that (a) SME engagement with the policy is fairly randomly distributed across the sector, and (b) there is little additional product–service innovation to justify the expenditure in foregone taxes given the current distribution of credits, but (c) there is evidence of enhanced radical process innovations, particularly when combined with strong capability and planning at the firm level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Response rates are not available for the 2007/2008 survey.

References

  1. Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78, 678–690. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811167.

  2. Acs, Z., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1988). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  4. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351. doi:10.2307/2951599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, NBER Chapters, pp. 609–626. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. ISBN: 0-87014-304-2.

  6. Autio, E., & Acs, Z. (2010). Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(3), 234–251. doi:10.1002/sej.93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker, B. (2014). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 5, 917–942. doi:10.1111/joes.12074.

  8. Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of OECD countries, 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1–31. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00086-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bottasso, A., Castagnetti, C., & Conti, M. (2013). R&D, innovation and knowledge spill-overs: A reappraisal of Bottazzi and Peri (2007) in the presence of cross- sectional dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(2), 350–352. doi:10.1002/jae.2392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bravo-Ortega, C., & Marin, A. G. (2011). R&D and productivity: A two-way process? World Development, 39, 1090–1107.

  11. Cappelen, A., Raknerud, A., & Rybalka, M. (2012). The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy, 41, 334–345. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coad, A., Cowling, M., Nightingale, P., Pellegrino, G., Savona, M., & Siepel, J. (2014). UK innovation survey: Highly innovative firms and growth. Department for Business Innovation and Skills, London. URN BIS/14/643.

  13. Coad, A., Frankish, J., Roberts, R., & Storey, D. (2012). Growth paths and survival chances: An application of the Gambler’s Ruin theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 615–632. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cowling, M., Bates, P., Murray, G., & Jagger, N. (2008). Study on the effect of the enterprise investment scheme (EIS) and venture capital trusts (VCT) on company performance. In HMRC Research Report No. 44. London. http://aka.hmrc.gov.uk/research/report44.pdf.

  15. Czarnitzki, D. (2006). Research and development in small- and medium-sized enterprises: The role of financial constraints and public funding. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(3), 257–335. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9485.2006.00383x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Czarnitzki, D., Hanelc, P., & Rosad, J. (2011). Evaluating the impact of tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40, 217–229. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2011). R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium sized firms. Small Business Economics, 36(1), 65–83. doi:10.1007/S11187-009-9189-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2013). Small Business Survey 2012: SME Employers. HMSO, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/small-business-survey-2012-sme-employers.

  19. Ettlie, J., & Rubenstein, J. (1987). Firm size and product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(I), 89–108. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.420089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Freel, M. (2000). Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 60–80. doi:10.1177/02662426000182003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grilliches, Z. (1998). R&D and productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  22. Guceri, I. (2013). Tax incentives and R&D: An evaluation of the 2002 UK reform using micro data. Department of Economics, University of Oxford. http://home.ku.edu.tr/wwe/guceri.pdf.

  23. Hall, B., & van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? Research Policy, 29, 449–471. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, N., Sameen, H., & Cowling, M. (2015). Access to finance for innovative SME after the financial crisis. Research Policy, 44(2), 370–380. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burdens, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392–1419. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lokshin, B., & Mohnen, P. (2012). How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. Applied Economics, 44(12), 1527–1538. doi:10.1080/00036846.2010.543083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mancusi, M., & Vezzuli, A. (2014). R&D and credit rationing in SMEs. Economic Enquiry, 52(3), 1153–1172. doi:10.1111/ecin.12080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2–3), 179–208. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.1995.0203-02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Mahony, M., & Vecchi, M. (2009). R&D, knowledge spillovers and productivity performance. Research Policy, 38, 35–44.

  30. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). STI Scoreboard 2007. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/sti-scoreboard-2007-en.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Radosevic, S. (2007). National Systems of Innovation and entrepreneurship: In search of a missing link. In UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies. Working Paper No. 73. http://discovery.ucl.uk/17479.

  32. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. doi:10.1086/261725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Cowling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cowling, M. You can lead a firm to R&D but can you make it innovate? UK evidence from SMEs. Small Bus Econ 46, 565–577 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9704-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • Tax credits
  • SMEs
  • Government policy

JEL Classifications

  • L50
  • L26
  • O31