Skip to main content

Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: a tale of two regions

Small Business Economics volume 46, pages 467–492 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Studies on the influence of entrepreneurial role models (peers) on the decision to start a firm argue that entrepreneurial role models in the local environment (1) provide opportunities to learn about entrepreneurial tasks and capabilities, and (2) signal that entrepreneurship is a favorable career option thereby reducing uncertainty that potential entrepreneurs face. However, these studies remain silent about the role of institutional context for these mechanisms. Applying an extended sender–receiver model, we hypothesize that observing entrepreneurs reduces fear of failure in others in environments where approval of entrepreneurship is high, while this effect is significantly weaker in low-approval environments. Taking advantage of the natural experiment from recent German history and using data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Project, we find considerable support for our hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. The decoding of information in terms of understanding the demonstrated entrepreneurial activity is an additional technical aspect.

  2. We assume that entrepreneurs send, on average, the same signals regardless of the underlying institutional approval. Relaxing this assumption should not be critical to our framework as long as differences in the kind of signals sent are due to differences in approval of entrepreneurship. In this respect, entrepreneurs in low-approval countries might share different signals or knowledge since they feel particularly conditioned and judged by their environment compared to high-approval countries. This mechanism would be in line with our reasoning.

  3. Socialism also imprinted regional development. Fritsch (2004) illustrates that East and West Germany are marked by distinct regional growth regimes. Hence, the conditions for regional growth and entrepreneurship should be different (see also, Fritsch et al. 2014). Transition-specific adjustment processes might explain why East German regions have significantly lower economic capabilities and relatively more unfavorable long-term prospects than West German regions (e.g., Kronthaler 2005; Uhlig 2008).

  4. Germany did not take part in the GEM 2007 cycle.

  5. This is indicated by the lower settlement structure-type number where (1) is a highly agglomerated area. For example, 18 % of all districts in West Germany are rural districts (type number = 4) in rural regions, while this is 38 % in East Germany.

  6. Because of the nested structure of our data (individuals in regions), multi-level models would be an alternative regression technique. However, likelihood ratio tests comparing multilevel models to standard logistic regressions reject the hypothesis of random effects, recommending the use of standard logistic regressions (Hox 2010). Moreover, in the case of our paper results from multi-level models do not differ substantially from those of logistic regression. We, thus, use standard logistic regressions throughout the paper. For an assessment of regional start-up activity by means of multi-level modeling, see Hundt (2012).

  7. Based on the estimates, the overall effect would turn to negative at an age of 76 years which is out of our sample range.

  8. The results hardly differ when interacting the dummy marking West Germans not knowing an entrepreneur and the one for East Germans not knowing an entrepreneur with the age variable.

  9. Interpreting interaction terms in nonlinear models is not straightforward. Using the more robust Ai et al. (2004) method confirms our initial interpretation. Results can be obtained upon request.

  10. Introducing an interaction term for the proxy for knowing an entrepreneur and the non-treated group of East Germans (those born in 1975 or later) does not change the significant effect for the treatment group. The interaction for younger East Germans itself is insignificant. This means that the effect of knowing an entrepreneur is not much different for younger East Germans as compared to West Germans that know an entrepreneur whereas there is a significant difference for older ones.

  11. The results are similar when including a dummy variable for younger East Germans born after 1975.

  12. Having entrepreneurial intentions is negatively correlated with fear of failure (r = −0.1829) and significantly negative related to being a latent entrepreneur in the regressions. Fear of failure might of course determine the probability to have entrepreneurial intentions, but it might be also the other way round. So, there is reverse causality and we do not want to interpret the models that “control” for fear of failure any further. The point that we want to drive home is that including fear of failure in the specifications of Table 4 would not change the coefficient estimates for the main variables of interest.

  13. The results are not published in the official GEM report for the 2014 wave but can be obtained upon request.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, gazelles and elephants. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ai, C., Wang, H., & Norton, E. C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. The STATA Journal, 4, 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Fuchs-Schuendeln, N. (2007). Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1507–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., & Koster, S. (2011). Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates—Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(1), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., & Thompson, P. (2011). Entrepreneurs, Jacks of all trades or Hobos? Research Policy, 40(5), 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., Gold, R., & Heblich, S. (2012). The shadows of the socialist past: Lack of self-reliance hinders entrepreneurship. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(4), 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (2005). Education for innovation: Entrepreneurial breakthroughs versus corporate incremental improvements. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 5, 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBSR. (2011). Laufende Raumbeobachtung—Raumabgrenzung [Continous Spatial Monitoring—Regional Boundaries], Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung. http://www.bbsr.bund.de/cln_032/nn_1067638/BBSR/DE/Raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/Kreistypen4/kreistypen.html.

  • Beck, G. (2004). Wandern gegen den Strom: West-Ost-Migration in Deutschland [Swim against the tide: West- East migration in Germany]. In F. Swiaczny & S. Haug (Eds.), Bevölkerungsgeographische Forschung zur Migration und Integration. Materialien zur Bevölkerungswissenschaft, Heft 112. Wiesbaden.

  • Bergmann, H., & Sternberg, R. (2007). The changing face of entrepreneurship in Germany. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Coduras, A., Litovsky, Y., & Seaman, J. (2012). GEM manual: A report on the design, data and quality control of the global entrepreneurship monitor. http://www.gemconsortium.org.

  • Bosma, N., Hessels, J., Schutjens, V., Van Praag, M., & Verheul, I. (2012b). Entrepreneurship and role models. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 410–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Stüber, H. (2012a). The selectiveness of the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Vorderwülbecke, A. (2012b). Global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM). Länderbericht Deutschland 2011 [Country Report Germany 2011]. Hannover: Institut für Wirtschafts- und Kulturgeographie, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Nürnberg: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (IAB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig-Koch, J., Helbach, C., Ockenfels, A., & Weimann, J. (2011). Still different after all these years: Solidarity behavior in East and West Germany. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11–12), 1373–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciotti, G., & Hayton, J. C. (2015). Fear and entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Stevens, C. E., & Potter, D. R. (2011). Misfortunes or mistakes? Cultural sensemaking of entrepreneurial failures. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, E. P. C., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2011). The relationship between prior and subsequent new venture creation in the United States: A county level analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chlosta, S., Patzelt, H., Klein, S. B., & Dormann, C. (2012). Parental role models and the decision to become self-employed: The moderating effect of personality. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, D. E., & Elliot, A. J. (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: Addressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(3), 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (1995). Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of human and social capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 388–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. D., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driga, O., Lafuente, E., & Vaillant, Y. (2009). Reasons for the relatively lower entrepreneurial activity levels of rural women in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 49(1), 70–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T., & Holtz-Eakin, D. (2000). Financial capital, human capital, and the transition to self-employment: Evidence from intergenerational links. Journal of Labor Economics, 18(2), 282–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, J. S., & Sakova, Z. (2000). Business start-ups or disguised unemployment? Evidence on the Character of Self-Employment From Transition Economies, Labour Economics, 7(5), 575–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1987). Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation: A macro-behavioral perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 8(2), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 861–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornahl, D. (2003). Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In Dirk Fornahl & Thomas Brenner (Eds.), Cooperation, networks, and institutions in regional innovation systems (pp. 38–57). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freytag, A., & Thurik, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship, entry and performance of new businesses compared in two growth regimes: East and West Germany. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Brixy, U. (2004). The establishment file of the German social insurance statistics. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, 124(1), 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., Bublitz, E., Rusakova, A., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). How much of a socialist legacy? The reemergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2007). The persistence of regional new business formation-activity over time—Assessing the potential of policy promotion programs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(3), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany 1925–2005. Regional Studies, 48(6), 955–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Crozier, L. M. (1985). Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., Cacciotti, G., Giazitzoglu, A., Mitchell, J. R., & Ainge, C. (2013). Fear of failure in entrepreneurship: A cognitive process framework. Working paper presented at the 2013 BCERC conference, Lyon.

  • Hessels, J., Grilo, I., Thurik, R., & van der Zwan, P. (2011). Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(3), 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundt, C. (2012). Zur Erklärung von Gründungsaktivitäten - Eine Mehrebenenanalyse aus individueller, regionaler und nationaler Perspektive [On the explanation of start-up activities—A multi-level analysis from an individual, a regional and a national perspective]. Münster: LIT-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Population Research. (2013). Binnenwanderungen in Deutschland. http://www.bib-demografie.de/DE/ZahlenundFakten/Wanderungen/Abbildungen/binnenwanderung.html. Accessed December 07, 2013.

  • Kacperczyk, A. (2013). Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organization Science, 24(3), 664–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibler, E., Kautonen, T., & Fink, M. (2014). Regional social legitimacy of entrepreneurship: Implications for entrepreneurial intention and start-up behavior. Regional Studies, 48(6), 995–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., & Schade, C. (2011). Gender differences in entrepreneurial propensity. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(2), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronthaler, F. (2005). Economic capability of East German regions: Results of a cluster analysis. Regional Studies, 39(6), 739–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Rialp, J. (2007). Regional differences in the influence of role models: Comparing the entrepreneurial process of rural catalonia. Regional Studies, 41(6), 779–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landier, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the stigma of failure. Unpublished working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=850446.

  • Lee, S.-H., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Bankruptcy laws and entrepreneurship development: A real options perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundström, A., & Stevenson, L. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J. (2009). Geographical environments for entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 7(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation, and the growth of firms. American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, G. (2006). Afterlife—Who takes heart for restart. ZEW discussion paper no. 06-038.

  • Minniti, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and network externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, P., Van Stel, A., & Storey, D. J. (2008). The effect of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, R., & Sørenson, J. (2010). Workplace peer effects and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 116–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., Silbereisen, R. K., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the united states, socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., & Stuetzer, M. (2011). Nascent entrepreneurship and the developing individual: Early entrepreneurial competence in adolescence and venture creation success during the career. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Stuetzer, M., Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Lamb, M. E., Potter, J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial regions: Do macro-psychological cultural characteristics of regions help solving the “knowledge paradox” of economics? PLoS ONE, 10, e0129332. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2007). Policymakers Beware! In David B Audretsch, Isabelo Grilo, & Roy A Thurik (Eds.), The handbook of entrepreneurship policy (pp. 54–63). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (1992). Radical transitions: The survival and revival of entrepreneurship in the GDR. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, H., & Siedler, R. (2009). Does democracy foster trust? Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(2), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., Medina-Garrido, J. A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2012). Determinants of hotels and restaurants entrepreneurship: A study using GEM data. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 579–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. (2007). New firm creation in the United States: A PSED I overview. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runst, P. (2013). Post-socialist culture and entrepreneurship. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 72(3), 593–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (1997). Influence of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18(2), 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semadeni, M., Cannella, A. A., Fraser, D. R., & Lee, D. S. (2005). Fight or flight: Managing stigma in executive careers. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 557–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., Wiklund, J., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Moving forward: Balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Corner, P., & Pavlovich, K. (2007). Coping with entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Management and Organization, 13(4), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics, 16, 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R. S. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicker, P. (1984). Stigma and social welfare. Croom Helm, London & New York: St. Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., Audretsch, D. B., Wyrwich, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Coombes, M., Shaw-Taylor, L., Satchell, M. (2015). Industry structure, entrepreneurship and culture: An empirical analysis using historical coalfields. European Economic Review. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.012.

  • Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Cantner, U. (2014). Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchmann, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. (1996). How to become an entrepreneur in East Germany: Conditions, steps and effects of the constitution of new entrepreneurs. In H. Brezinski & M. Fritsch (Eds.), The economic impact of new firms in post-Socialist countries—Bottom up transformation in Eastern Europe (pp. 227–232). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2009). The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Flores, M. (2010). The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 541–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlig, H. (2008). The slow decline of East Germany. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(4), 517–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, Y., & Lafuente, E. (2007). Do different institutional frameworks condition the influence of local fear of failure and entrepreneurial examples over entrepreneurial activity? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(4), 313–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken, H., Fry, F. L., & Stephens, P. (2006). The influence of role models on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoorn, A., & Maseland, R. (2010). Cultural differences between East and West Germany after 1991: Communist values versus economic performance? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76, 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Stel, A., & Suddle, K. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2007). What a difference a Y makes-female and male nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. Small Business Economics, 28(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., & Sternberg, R. (2004). Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data. Annals of Regional Science, 38(2), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westlund, H., & Bolton, R. (2003). Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 77–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory economics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyrwich, M. (2013). Can socioeconomic heritage produce a lost generation with regard to entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyrwich, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship and intergenerational value transmission. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich Schiller University Jena, School of Economics and Business Administration, Carl-Zeiss Str. 3, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Michael Wyrwich

  2. Baden Württemberg Cooperative State University, Coblitzallee 1-9, 68193, Mannheim, Germany

    Michael Stuetzer

  3. Faculty of Economic Sciences and Media, Institute of Economics, Ilmenau University of Technology, Ehrenbergstr. 29, 98684, Ilmenau, Germany

    Michael Stuetzer

  4. Institute of Economic and Cultural Geography, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Schneiderberg 50, 30167, Hanover, Germany

    Rolf Sternberg

Authors
  1. Michael Wyrwich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Stuetzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rolf Sternberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Wyrwich.

Additional information

We are indebted to Michael Fritsch, Thomas Grebel, and Elisabeth Bublitz for helpful comments.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 10 and 11.

Table 10 Age treatment approach for different age groups
Full size table
Table 11 Models including respondents of different age cohorts
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wyrwich, M., Stuetzer, M. & Sternberg, R. Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: a tale of two regions. Small Bus Econ 46, 467–492 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9695-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9695-4

Keywords

  • Fear of failure
  • Role models
  • Peer effect
  • Entrepreneurial intentions
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
  • Communist legacy
  • East Germany

JEL Classifications

  • D01
  • L26
  • M13
  • P20
  • R23
  • Z13