Identifying the effect of college education on business and employment survival
- 1.2k Downloads
We use a multipronged identification strategy to estimate the effect of college education on business and employment survival. We account for the endogeneity of both education and business ownership with a competing risks duration model augmented with a college selection equation. We estimate the model jointly on the self-employed and salaried employees in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979. Unlike most previous studies, we find that college does not increase business survival. By contrast, a college degree significantly increases employment survival. Cognitive skills have a positive impact on survival for both the self-employed and employees. These findings suggest that college benefits the self-employed less than salaried, perhaps by generating skills more useful in employment than self-employment, or because of differences in the value of signaling.
KeywordsBusiness survival Employment survival College education Cognitive skills Locus of control
JEL ClassificationsC41 J24 L26
We thank Luigi Zingales, Erik G. Hurst, Robert J. LaLonde, Susanne M. Schennach, Steven N. Kaplan, Adair Morse, Luigi Guiso, Margarita Tsoutsoura, James J. Heckman, the participants to many seminars at the University of Chicago and the participants to the Brownbag Seminar at Boston Fed for useful comments. Jacob Bergmann Larsen provided excellent research assistance. All remaining errors are ours. This research was conducted with restricted access to Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the BLS. Financial support from the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
- Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
- Begley, T., & Boyd, D. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 79–93. doi: 10.1177/0021886300361003.
- Berlew, D. (1975). The nature of entrepreneurs. Proceedings of project ISEED (international symposium on entrepreneurship and enterprise development) (pp. 42–44). Ohio: Columbus.Google Scholar
- Blanchflower, D. G., & Meyer, B. D. (1994). A longitudinal analysis of the young self-employed in Australia and the United States. Small Business Economics, 6(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1007/BF01066108.
- Block, J. H., Hoogerheide, L., & Thurik, R. (2012). Are education and entrepreneurial income endogenous? A Bayesian analysis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2(3). doi: 10.1515/2157-5665.1051.
- Card, D. (1995). Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. In L. N. Christodes, E. K. Grant, & R. Swidinsky (Eds.), Aspects of labour market behaviour: Essays in honour of John Vanderkamp. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, Vol. 3A, Ch. 30. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Card, D. (2001). Estimating the return to schooling: Progress on some persistent econometric problems. Econometrica, 9(5), 1127–1160. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00237.
- Chiappori, P.-A., Iyigun, M., & Weiss, Y. (2009). Investment in schooling and the marriage market. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1689–1713. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.5.1689.
- Davidsson, P., & Gordon, S. R. (2012). Panel studies of new venture creation: A methods-focused review and suggestions for future research. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 853–876. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9325-8.
- Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6.
- De Giorgi, G., Pellizzari, M., & Redaelli, S. (2010). Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 241–275. doi: 10.1257/app.2.2.241.
- De Wit, G., & van Winden, F. A. A. M. (1989). An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 1(4), 263–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00393805.
- Eberwein, C., Ham, J. C., & LaLonde, R. J. (1997). The impact of being offered and receiving classroom training on the employment histories of disadvantaged women: Evidence from experimental data. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 655–682. doi: 10.2307/2971734.
- Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79(3), 519–535.Google Scholar
- Ham, J. C., & LaLonde, R. J. (1996). The effect of sample selection and initial conditions in duration models: Evidence from experimental data on training. Econometrica, 64(1), 175–205. doi: 10.2307/2171928.
- Harmon, C., Oosterbeek, H., & Walker, I. (2003). The returns to education: Microeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), 115–156. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00191.
- Hartog, J., Van Praag, M., & Van Der Sluis, J. (2010). If you are so smart, why aren’t you an entrepreneur? Returns to cognitive and social ability: Entrepreneurs versus employees. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19(4), 947–989. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00274.x.
- Heckman, J. J., Lochner, L. J., & Todd, P. E. (2006). Earnings functions, rates of return and treatment effects: The Mincer equation and beyond. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 1, Ch. 7). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Hurst, E., & Pugsley, B. (2010). The non pecuniary benefits of small business ownership. University of Chicago, working paper.Google Scholar
- Keane, M. P., & Wolpin, K. I. (1997). The career decisions of young men. Journal of Political Economy, 105(3), 473–522. doi: 10.1086/262080.
- Kenkel, D. S. (1991). Health behavior, health knowledge, and schooling. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), 287–305. doi: 10.1086/261751.
- Marvel, M. R., Davis, J. L., & Sproul, C. R. (2014). Human capital and entrepreneurship research: A critical review and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. doi: 10.1111/etap.12136.
- Mayer-Haug, K., Read, S., Brinckmann, J., Dew, N., & Grichnik, D. (2013). Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs. Research Policy, 42(6), 1251–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.001.
- Oreopoulos, P., & Salvanes, K. G. (2011). Priceless: The nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), 159–184. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.1.159.
- Puri, M., & Robinson, D. T. (2013). The economic psychology of entrepreneurship and family business. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 22(2), 423–444. doi: 10.1111/jems.12013.
- Sanandaji, T. (2010). Self-employment does not measure entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago mimeo.Google Scholar
- Simpson, W., & Sproule, R. (1998) Econometric analysis of canadian self-employment using SLID. Income and labour dynamics working paper series 98(16).Google Scholar
- Van Praag, C. M. (2007). Venture performance and venture inputs: The role of human and financial capital. In S. Parker (Ed.), The life cycle of entrepreneurial ventures. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, Vol. 3, pp. 507–533. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-32313-8_17.
- Van Praag, M., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Van der Sluis, J. (2009). Returns for entrepreneurs versus employees: The effect of education and personal control on the relative performance of entrepreneurs vis-a-vis wage employees. IZA DP 4628, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- Webbink, D. (2005). Causal Effects in Education. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 535–560. doi: 10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00258.x.