Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the dynamics of entrepreneurship through framework approaches

Small Business Economics volume 45, pages 1–13 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Although entrepreneurship is not a new phenomenon, attempts to study it in a systematic manner are fairly recent. The field of entrepreneurship has evolved in a rather disjointed or seemingly random manner, and entrepreneurship has developed as a business discipline by borrowing, building upon, and adapting theoretical and conceptual work from such fields as sociology, psychology, anthropology, marketing, management, finance, organizational behavior, and engineering. And yet, it would appear that the volume of work attempting to describe, explain, and predict aspects of entrepreneurship has grown to a point where we can begin to develop a more complete and integrated picture. The purpose of this paper was to examine the various theoretical perspectives and frameworks of entrepreneurship and to offer an integrative perspective through a proposed “framework of frameworks” which ties together other existing frameworks, each of which explores a particular aspect of the overall phenomenon of entrepreneurship. The value of using a framework to explain and therefore better understand entrepreneurship is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Adizes, I. (1988). Corporate lifecycles: How and why corporations grow and die. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvord, S. H., Brown, D. L., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurial research. Journal of Management Studies, 30(5), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, M. (2004). Education matters—but does entrepreneurship education? An interview with David Birch. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., George, G., & Alexy, O. (2011). International entrepreneurship and capability development—Qualitative evidence and future research direction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, 58(2), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. London: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, I., & Willard, G. E. (1993). Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(3), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., Fiet, J. O., & Moesel, D. D. (2004). Reconsidering the venture capitalists’ value added proposition: An interorganizational learning perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6), 787–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. (2011). Resilience of family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1107–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 6(3), 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E., McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (2011). The emergence, advance and future of international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 625–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2006). Towards building cumulative knowledge on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, D. R., & Chandler, G. N. (2007). The role of gender in opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, D., Shepherd, D. A., & DeCastro, J. O. (2008). The fallacy of “only the strong survive”: The effects of human capital and extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions of under-performing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 526–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Domenico, M. L., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimov, D. (2011a). Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimov, D. (2011b). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1123–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimov, D., Shepherd, D. A., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L., & Yli-Renko, H. (2010). The impact of environment and entrepreneurial perceptions on venture creation efforts: Bridging the discovery and creation views of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 833–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, T. (2002). Entrepreneurial capital: The emerging venture’s most important asset and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1989). Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., Mitchell, T. R., & Vesper, K. H. (1989). A taxonomy of new business ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gielnik, M. M., Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2012). Focus on opportunities as a mediator of the relationship between business owner’s age and venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. A. (2008). Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition. Organization Science, 21, 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, D. A., Corbett, A. C., & McMullen, J. S. (2011). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1443–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D. A., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2012). Cognitive adaptability and an entrepreneurial task: The role of metacognitive ability and feedback. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1988). The entrepreneur: Mainstream views and radical critiques. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (2009). A history of entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H., & Gimeno, J. (2010). Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. V., & Shepherd, D. A. (2013). Deciding to persist: Adversity, values, and entrepreneurs’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Shepherd, D. A., & Bott, J. P. (2009). Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions: Examining perception and position. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25.

  • Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 632–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck, G. M., & Beamish, P. W. (2010). The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 735–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2014). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, practice (9th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage/Southwestern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2014). Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I. C., & Katz, J. A. (1992). Idiosyncratic milieus of entrepreneurship research: The need for comprehensive theories. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. (1987). Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 21(2), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S. (2011). Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market-based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Encouraging consensus-challenging research in universities. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1643–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (2014). Online dictionary and thesaurus (http://www.merriam-webster.com/). Accessed 12 November 2014.

  • Miner, J. B. (2000). Testing a psychological typology of entrepreneurship using business founders. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, J. B. (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroz, P. W., & Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonizing multiple perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 781–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Allen, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., & Brannon, D. (2010). Experiencing family business creation: Differences between founders, nonfamily managers, and founders of nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1057–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage/South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Schindehutte, M. (2001a). Understanding entrepreneurship through frameworks. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2(1), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Schindehutte, M. (2001b). Classification as a factor in the scientific evolution of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 11(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Lewis, P., & Sexton, D. L. (1994). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurship: An input–output perspective. Advanced Management Journal, 59(1), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okhuysen, G., & Bonardi, J. P. (2011). The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B. D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P. H. (2004). Entrepreneurship theory: Possibilities and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 617–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnatunga, J., & Romano, C. (1997). A citation classics analysis of articles in contemporary small enterprise research. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, A. M., & Watson, J. (2012). Gender differences in firm performance: Evidence from new ventures in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 544–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronstadt, R. C. (1984). Entrepreneurship. Dover, MA: Lord Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, L. M. (2010). Fighting an uphill battle: Expansion barriers, intra-industry social stratification, and minority firm growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Multilevel entrepreneurship research: Opportunities for studying entrepreneurial decision making. Journal of Management, 37(2), 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., & Miner, J. B. (1983). Type of entrepreneur, type of firm and managerial motivation: Implications for organizational life cycle theory. Strategic Management Journal, 4(4), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H., Roberts, M., & Grousbeck, H. I. (1992). New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Chicago: Irwin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, C. Y., Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1991). The development and interpretation of entrepreneurial typologies. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(2), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, J. G., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The entrepreneur–environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, E., van den Bos, K., & Pieters, R. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA

    Donald F. Kuratko

  2. Warrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Michael H. Morris

  3. Whitman School of Management, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244-2130, USA

    Minet Schindehutte

Authors
  1. Donald F. Kuratko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael H. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Minet Schindehutte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald F. Kuratko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuratko, D.F., Morris, M.H. & Schindehutte, M. Understanding the dynamics of entrepreneurship through framework approaches. Small Bus Econ 45, 1–13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9627-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9627-3

Keywords

JEL Classifications

search

Navigation