Skip to main content
Log in

Transnational activities of immigrant-owned firms and their performances in the USA

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using microdata from the U.S. Survey of Business Owners 2007, this study examines transnational activities of immigrant-owned businesses in three aspects: Whether they export, outsource jobs, and have overseas establishments. Results show that immigrant-owned firms have significantly higher tendency to be involved in transnational economic activities when compared to non-immigrant-owned firms. Immigrant firms without transnational activities have significantly fewer employees, smaller annual total sales, and smaller total payrolls than non-immigrant firms. However, immigrant-owned firms with transnational activities fare significantly better than non-immigrant-owned firms without transnational activities. These findings speak directly to the long-debated issues concerning different motivations and performance outcomes of immigrant business ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We understand that the owner’s function in a firm has multiple dimensions in addition to financial control. For example, the style and strategies of daily management significantly affect business operation and performance. Labor force recruitment, market information analyses, and forefront interaction with customers, which are especially important when dealing with transnational transactions, may not be executed by the owners who have the financial control but by the owners who manage day-to-day operations, who directly provide services or produce goods, or who perform other functions. Therefore, we test our results by defining a firm as an immigrant-owned firm once there is one foreign-born owner. Results from regression do not significantly differ from our current observation qualitatively.

  2. For the 2007 SBO, the primary method of disclosure avoidance is noise infusion in which values are perturbed prior to tabulation by applying a random noise multiplier to the magnitude data, such as these performance indicators (employment size, sales and payroll). Disclosure protection is accomplished in a manner that causes the vast majority of cell values to be perturbed by at most a few percentage points. In addition, the SBO 2007 public use microdata sample provides the performance indicators at the establishment level for each record.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Morck, R. K., & Yeung, B. (2001). Entrepreneurship, globalisation, and public policy. Journal of International Management, 7, 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. doi:10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Waldinger, R. (1990). Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 111–135. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000551.

  • Appold, S. J., & Kasard, J. D. (2004). Building community through entrepreneurship: Lessons from Vietnam and the United States. In J. Butler, & G. Kozmetsky (Eds.), Immigrant and minority entrepreneurship: Building American communities (pp. 61–84). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

  • Barrett, G. A., Jones, T. P., & McEvoy, David. (1996). Ethnic minority business: Theoretical discourse in Britain and North America. Urban Studies, 33(4/5), 783–809. doi:10.1080/00420989650011825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., & Robb, A. (2008). Analysis of young neighborhood firms serving urban minority clients. Journal of Economics and Business, 60(1), 139–148. doi:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2007.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T. (1984). Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 195–208. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(84)90006-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, K-S., Yoon, I-J., & Smith, D. (1996). Immigrant small business and international economic linkage: A case of the Korean wig business in Los Angeles, 1968–1977. International Migration Review, 485–510. doi:10.2307/2547391.

  • Coviello, N. E., & McAuley, A. (1999). Internationalisation and the smaller firm: a review of contemporary empirical research. Management International Review (MIR), 39(3), 223–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakins, D., Smallbone, D., Ishaq, M., Whittam, G., & Wyper, J. (2009). Minority ethnic enterprise in Scotland. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 35(2), 309–330. doi:10.1080/13691830802586468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.

  • Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001–1022. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00332.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, S., & Nguyen, T.-N. (2011). The making and transnationalization of an ethnic niche: Vietnamese manicurists. International Migration Review, 45(3), 639–674. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00861.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad, H. (2004). Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: A grounded theoretical framework and an overview. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 21(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2004.tb00319.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, W. (2012). Immigrants may hold the key to urban renewal in Baltimore. http://immigrationimpact.com/2012/11/30/immigrants-may-hold-the-key-to-urban-renewal-in-baltimore/.

  • Faist, T. (2008). Migrants as transnational development agents: an inquiry into the newest round of the migration-development nexus. Population, Space and Place, 14(1), 21–42. doi:10.1002/psp.471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. T., & Gardner, R. W. (1994). Asian immigrant entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs: A comparative study of recent Korean and Filipino immigrants. Population and Environment, 15(3), 211–238. doi:10.1007/BF02208201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Reuber, B. (2008). Survival of the fittest: Which SMEs internationalize most extensively and effectively? (pp. 31): The Conference Board of Canada.

  • Gjellerup, P. (2000). SME support services in the face of globalisation. Concerted action seminar, Opening address, Conference Proceedings, Danish Agency for Trade and Industry, Copenhagen, pp. 16–28.

  • Green, N. L. (1996). Women and immigrants in the sweatshop: Categories of labor segmentation revisited. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38(03), 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D. M., & Acs, Z. J. (2011). High-tech immigrant entrepreneurship in the United States. Economic Development Quarterly, 25(2):16–129.

  • Hudson, K. (2007). The new labor market segmentation: Labor market dualism in the new economy. Social Science Research, 36(1), 286–312. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hum, T. (2003). Mapping global production in New York City’s garment industry: The role of sunset park, Brooklyn’s immigrant economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 17(3), 294–309. doi:10.1177/0891242403255088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 2(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallick, D. D. (2012). Immigrant small business owners: A significant and growing part of the economy immigration research initiative. New York: Fiscal Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. H., & House-Soremekun, B. (2009). Entrepreneurship and neighbourhood among African Americans in Cleveland, Ohio. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 3(3), 256–270. doi:10.1504/IJBG.2009.023498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariv, D., Menzies, T. V., Brenner, G. A., & Filion, L. J. (2009). Transnational networking and business performance: Ethnic entrepreneurs in Canada. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(3), 239–264. doi:10.1080/08985620802261641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, J., Smallbone, D., & Athayde, R. (2009). Ethnic diasporas and business competitiveness: Minority-owned enterprises in London. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 35(4), 689–705. doi:10.1080/13691830902765368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov, Y. N. (2006). Diaspora networks and the international migration of skills: How countries can draw on their talent abroad. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Lehtinen, U., & Penttinen, H. (1999). Definition of the internationalization of the firm. In U. Lehtinen & H. Seristoe (Eds.), Perspectives on internationalization (pp. 3–19). Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, I., & Rosenstein, C. (1995). Race, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship in urban America. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. Y., Painter, G., & Wang, Q. (2014). Lessions for metro areas characteristics and clustering of high-tech immigrant entrepreneurs. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation White Paper.

  • Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miera, F. (2008). Transnational strategies of polish migrant entrepreneurs in trade and small business in Berlin. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 34(5), 753–770. doi:10.1080/13691830802106010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miesenbock, K. J. (1988). Small business and exporting: A literature review. International Small Business Journal, 6(2), 42–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakhaie, R., Lin, X., & Guan, J. (2009). Social capital and the myth of minority self-employment: Evidence from Canada. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 35(4), 625–644. doi:10.1080/13691830902765244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, F., Orser, B., Riding, A., & Jung, O. (2014). Do young firms owned by recent immigrants outperform other young firms? Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (2003). Conclusion: Theoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37(3), 874–892. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00161.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Haller, W. J. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 278–298. doi:10.2307/3088896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Jensen, L. (1989). The enclave and the entrants: Patterns of ethnic enterprise in Miami before and after Mariel. American Sociological Review, 54(6), 929–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., & Chacko, E. (2009). The mixed embeddedness of ethnic entrepreneurs in a new immigrant gateway. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 7(3), 328–346. doi:10.1080/15562940903150105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raijman, R., & Tienda, M. (2000). Immigrants’ pathways to business ownership: A comparative ethnic perspective. International Migration Review, 682–706. doi:10.2307/2675942.

  • Reid, S. D. (1981). The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. (1997). New and small firms in expanding markets. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 79–84. doi:10.1023/A:1007916217140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzzier, M., Hisrich, R. D., & Antoncic, B. (2006). SME internationalization research: past, present, and future. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(4), 476–497. doi:10.1108/14626000610705705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. M., & Nee, V. (1987). Limits of ethnic solidarity in the enclave economy. American Sociological Review, 52, 745–773.

  • Saxenian, A. (2002). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant high-growth entrepreneurs. Economic Development Quarterly, 16(1):20–31.

  • Saxenian, A. (2007). The new Argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R., & Siegel, D. S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 893–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S., & Senor, D. (2011). Start-up nation: The story of Israel’s economic miracle. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.

  • Stafford, B. (2012). Seattle’s Korean community: How immigration makes us all stronger. Crosscut.com. http://crosscut.com/2012/11/21/culture-ethnicity/111416/bill-stafford-korean-community-business/.

  • Sullivan, D. G. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 325–342. doi:10.2307/155392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, V., Saxenian, A., Rissing, B., & Gereffi, G. (2007). America’s new immigrant entrepreneurs, Part 1. Duke University, Pratt School of Engineering Manuscript, January.

  • Waldinger, R., Aldrich, H., & Ward, R. (1990). Ethnic entrepreneurs: immigrant business in industrial societies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R., & Lapp, M. (1993). Back to the sweatshop or ahead to the informal sector? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17(1), 6–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1993.tb00209.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2012). Ethnic entrepreneurship studies in geography: A review. Geography Compass, 6(4), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. L., & Portes, A. (1980). Immigrant enclaves: An analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami. The American Journal of Sociology, 86(2), 295–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. (1992). Chinatown: The socioeconomic potential of an urban enclave. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., & Cho, M. (2010). Noneconomic effects of ethnic entrepreneurship: Evidence from Chinatown and Koreatown in Los Angeles, USA. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(2), 83–96.

  • Zhou, Y., & Hsu, J.-Y. (2011). Divergent engagements: Roles and strategies of Taiwanese and mainland Chinese returnee entrepreneurs in the IT industry. Global Networks, 11(3), 398–419. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00302.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingfang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Liu, C.Y. Transnational activities of immigrant-owned firms and their performances in the USA. Small Bus Econ 44, 345–359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9595-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9595-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation