Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of working time preferences and fair wage perceptions on entrepreneurial intentions among employees

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, little is known about how working time preferences and fair wage perceptions affect employees’ entrepreneurial intentions. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study, we provide first evidence that the difference between the actual and desired amount of working hours in paid employment is positively related to the propensity to switch to self-employment. Furthermore, our analysis supports the hypothesis that employees who perceive their current wage level as very unfair are more likely to have higher entrepreneurial intentions. However, the closer actual wages get to the wage levels perceived as fair, the more employees are likely to remain in their current employment situation. We also tested the interaction effect of working time preferences and fair wage perceptions. In line with our theoretical considerations, we find that employees who perceive their wages as unfair and, simultaneously, prefer different work hours have the strongest entrepreneurial intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeler, J., Falk, A., Götte, L., & Huffman, D. (2011). Reference points and effort provision. American Economic Review, 101(2), 470–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, P. (2008). Happiness and health: Well-being among the self-employed. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, P., & Wadensjö, E. (2013). The best and the brightest or the least successful? Self-employment entry among male wage-earners in Sweden. Small Business Economics, 40(1), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backes-Gellner, U., & Werner, A. (2007). Entrepreneurial signaling via education: A success factor in innovative start-ups. Small Business Economics, 29(1–2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, M., & Frey, B. (2004). Being independent raises happiness at work. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11, 95–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, H., & Sternberg, R. (2007). The changing face of entrepreneurship in Germany. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, T. (1999). Why wages don’t fall during a recession?. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. W. (1971). Towards a theoretical model for the study of occupational choice. Sociology, 5(3), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. (2000). Self-employment in OECD Countries. Labour Economics, 7(5), 471–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., Oswald, A., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Latent entrepreneurship across nations. European Economic Review, 45(4), 680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, R. (1999). Flexible working hours, family responsibilities and female self-employment: gender differences in self-employment selection. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(1), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böheim, R., & Taylor, M. P. (2004). Actual and preferred working hours. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(1), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M. D., Sørensen, J. B., & Beckman, C. (2002). Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 19, 229–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. (1997). Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 407–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. A., Ganco, M., Franco, A. M., & Agarwal, R. (2012). Who leaves, where to, an why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesinger, B., Fink, M., Madsen, T. K., & Kraus, S. (2012). Rapidly internationalizing ventures: How definitions can bridge the gap across contexts. Management Decision, 50(10), 1816–1842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromie, S., & Hayes, J. (1991). Business ownership as a means of overcoming job dissatisfaction. Personnel Review, 20(1), 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2006). Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship Research, 2(1), 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Gordon, S. (2012). Panel studies of new venture creation: A methods-focused review and suggestions for future research. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 853–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C., Henley, A., & Latreille, P. (2009). Why do individuals choose self-employment? Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Discussion Paper No. 3974.

  • de Wit, G., & van Winden, F. (1989). An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 1(4), 367–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., & Davidsson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E., & Shepherd, D. (2000). Entrepreneurship as a utility-maximizing response. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T., & Holtz-Eakin, D. (2000). Financial capital, human capital and the transition to self-employment: Evidence from intergenerational links. Journal of Labor Economics, 18(2), 282–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of self-employment. American Economic Review, 79(3), 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, C., Anxo, D., & Boulin, J. (2006). Working time options over the life course: New work patterns and company strategies. Gothenburg, Sweden: Centre for European Labor Market Studies HB (CELMS HB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R., & Krashinsky, H. (2012). Liquidity constraints, household wealth and entrepreneurship revisited. Review of Income and Wealth, 58(2), 279–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R., & Robb, A. (2007). Families, human capital, and small business: Evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(2), 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Götte, L. (2007). Do workers work more when wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Economic Review, 97(1), 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fladung, E., & Iseke, A. (2010). Satisfaction and discrepancies between actual and desired job characteristics: A comparison between part-time and full-time employees based on the German socio-economic panel. Working Paper.

  • Gächter, S., & Thöni, C. (2010). Social Comparison and Performance: Experimental. Evidence on the Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Discussion Paper No. 4687.

  • Golden, L. (2001). Flexible work schedules: What are we trading off to get them? Monthly Labor Review, 124, 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial spawning: Public cooperations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 577–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilo, I., & Irigoyen, J. (2006). Entrepreneurship in the EU: To wish and not to be. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilo, I., & Thurik, A. (2005). Entrepreneurial engagement levels in the European Union. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 3(2), 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. (2000). Does entrepreneurship Pay? An empirical analysis of returns to self-employement. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 605–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heineck, G., & Möller, J. (2012). Geschlechtsspezifisches Arbeitsmarktverhalten, Verdienste und Wohlbefinden im Familienkontext. In H. Bertram and M. Bujard (Eds). Zeit, Geld, InfrastrukturZur Zukunft der Familienpolitik, Soziale Welt. Sonderband 19, Nomos, Baden–Baden.

  • Hellmann, T. (2007). When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science, 53(6), 919–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundley, G. (2001). Why and when are the self-employed more satisfied with their work? Industrial Relations, 40(2), 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchens, R. (1989). Seniority, wages and produtivity: A turbulent decade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyytinen, A., & Maliranta, M. (2006). When do employees leave their job for entrepreneurship: Evidence from linked employer-employee data. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Discussion Paper No.1023.

  • Jacobs, G. (2008). An occupational choice model for developing countries. Journal of Economic Development, 33(2), 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, D., & Page, M. E. (1996). Degrees matter: New evidence on sheepskin effects in the returns to education. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 733–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E. (2000). Self-employment and the predicted earnings differential—Evidence from Finland. Finnish Economic Review, 13(1), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, S. M. (1979). Impatience, information and risk taking in a general equilibrium Model of occupational choice. Review of Economic Studies, 46(145), 707–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi, D. (2002). Compensating Wage Differentials among Self-employed Workers: Evidence from Job Satisfaction Scores. Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University Discussion Paper No. 568.

  • Mayraz, G., Wagner, G., & Schupp, J. (2009). Life satisfaction and relative income-perceptions and evidence. SOEP Papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research at DIW Berlin No. 214.

  • Merz, J. (2002). Time and economic well-being: A panel analysis of desired versus actual working hours. Review of Income and Wealth, 48(3), 317–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohnen, A., & Pokorny, K. (2005). Reference dependent preferences in employer-employee-relationships: a real effort experiment on the incentive impact of the fixed wage. Working Paper.

  • Mueller, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship in the region: Breeding ground for nascent entrepreneurs? Small Business Economics, 27(1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ockenfels, A., Sliwka, D., & Werner, P. (2010). Bonus Payments and Reference Point Violations. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Discussion Paper 4795.

  • Parker, S. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2007). Which firms do the entrepreneurs come from? Economics Bulletin, 10(10), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2009). Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(3), 484–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S., & van Praag, C. M. (2006). Schooling, capital constraints, and entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 24(4), 416–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, C., & Schneck, S. (2012). Relative wage positions and quit behavior: Evidence from linked employer-employee data. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 65(1), 126–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, C. (1999). The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 7–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H., & Shah, A. (1986). An empirical analysis of self-employed in the UK. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1(1), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. (2003). You can’t always get the hours you want: Mismatches between actual and preferred work hours in the US. Social Forces, 81(4), 1171–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneck, S. (2011). The effect of relative standing on considerations about self-employment. SOEP Papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research at DIW Berlin No. 426.

  • Sternberg, R., Vonderwuelbecke, A., & Brixy, U. (2013). Global entrepreneurship monitor—Länderbericht Deutschland 2012. Hannover/Nürnberg: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, H., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (2003). Time to work: A comparative analysis of preferences for working hours. Work and Occupations, 30(3), 302–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2009). Estimation of an occupational choice model when occupations are misclassified. Journal of Human Resources, 44(2), 495–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, H. (2010). Characteristics of the underemployed and the overemployed in the UK. Economics and Labour Market Review, 4(7), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1996). Earnings, independence or unemployment: Why become self-employed? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(2), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, D., Busenitz, L., & Arthurs, J. (2010). To start or not to start: Outcome and ability expectations in the decision to start a new venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo, R. (2001). Homo entreprenaurus? Applied Economics, 33(13), 1631–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions and culture. In D. B. Audretsch, A. R. Thurik, I. Verheul, & A. R. M. Wennekers (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European-US comparison (pp. 11–81). Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2004). Are young and small firms hothouses for nascent entrepreneurs? Applied Economics Quarterly, 50(4), 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., & Sternberg, R. (2005). Personal and regional determinants of entrepreneurial activities: Empirical evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM). Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, 25(1), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G., Frick, J., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)—Evolution, scope and enhancements. SOEP paper No.1.

  • Waldman, M. (1984). Job assignments, signaling and efficiency. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(2), 431–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, A., & Moog, P. (2007). Arbeitsbedingungen in KMU und ihr Einfluss auf die Neigung zur Selbständigkeit: Eine empirische und theoretische Untersuchung auf Basis des Humankapitalansatzes. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue, 6, 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooden, M., Warren, D., & Drago, R. (2009). Working time mismatch and subjective well-being. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), 147–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arndt Werner.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Pair-wise correlations among key variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werner, A., Gast, J. & Kraus, S. The effect of working time preferences and fair wage perceptions on entrepreneurial intentions among employees. Small Bus Econ 43, 137–160 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9528-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9528-2

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation